Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Virginia opinions name it 5 courts 1996–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bennett v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2009See, e.g., Bennett v. Commonwealth, 29 Va.App. 261, 280 , 511 S.E.2d 439, 448 (1999); see also Manetta v. Commonwealth, 231 Va. 123 , 127 n. 2, 340 S.E.2d 828 , 830 n. 2 (1986) (recognizing the well-settled principle that, where a defendant successfully objects to the admission of evidence and requests that it be stricken or obtains a ruling that evidence is admissible for only a limited purpose, a court has no duty to give a cautionary or limiting instruction unless the defendant specifically requests one). 2009See, e.g., Bennett v. Commonwealth, 29 Va.App. 261, 280 , 511 S.E.2d 439, 448 (1999); see also Manetta v. Commonwealth, 231 Va. 123 , 127 n. 2, 340 S.E.2d 828 , 830 n. 2 (1986) (recognizing the well-settled principle that, where a defendant successfully objects to the admission of evidence and requests that it be stricken or obtains a ruling that evidence is admissible for only a limited purpose, a court has no duty to give a cautionary or limiting instruction unless the defendant specifically requests one). | 3 | 3 |
Manetta v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2009See, e.g., Bennett v. Commonwealth, 29 Va.App. 261, 280 , 511 S.E.2d 439, 448 (1999); see also Manetta v. Commonwealth, 231 Va. 123 , 127 n. 2, 340 S.E.2d 828 , 830 n. 2 (1986) (recognizing the well-settled principle that, where a defendant successfully objects to the admission of evidence and requests that it be stricken or obtains a ruling that evidence is admissible for only a limited purpose, a court has no duty to give a cautionary or limiting instruction unless the defendant specifically requests one). 2009See, e.g., Bennett v. Commonwealth, 29 Va.App. 261, 280 , 511 S.E.2d 439, 448 (1999); see also Manetta v. Commonwealth, 231 Va. 123 , 127 n. 2, 340 S.E.2d 828 , 830 n. 2 (1986) (recognizing the well-settled principle that, where a defendant successfully objects to the admission of evidence and requests that it be stricken or obtains a ruling that evidence is admissible for only a limited purpose, a court has no duty to give a cautionary or limiting instruction unless the defendant specifically requests one). | 3 | 3 |
Allstate Insurance v. Wadegreen2 sentences2010Co. v. Wade, 265 Va. 383, 391-92 , 579 S.E.2d 180, 184 (2003). 2010Co. v. Wade, 265 Va. 383, 391-92 , 579 S.E.2d 180, 184 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Banks v. City of Richmond
green
1 sentence2025It was held that the maintenance man’s conduct was so “highly extraordinary” that it was a superseding cause, relieving the city of liability for failing to turn off the gas at the meter. 232 Va. at 136 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Leary v. United States
green
2 sentences2006For an example of a presumption lacking a rational connection between the fact proved and the ultimate fact presumed, see Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S. Ct. 1532 , 23 L. 2006For an example of a presumption lacking a rational connection between the fact proved and the ultimate fact presumed, see Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S. Ct. 1532 , 23 L. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
William E. Raftery, Sr. v. Katheryn Girvin Scott
green
1 sentence2000The Court stated that the two torts have different characteristics and require different proof, citing as an example the requirement for intentional infliction of emotional distress that the infliction be intentional and something more than a simple aggravation. 756 F.2d at 340 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Mullaney v. Wilbur
green
1 sentence2000In Mullaney , the Court specifically cited this instruction from Barnes as an example of an instruction that satisfies due process requirements because “the ultimate burden of persuasion by proof beyond a reasonable doubt remain[s] on the prosecution.” Mullaney, 421 U.S. at 702 n.31. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
In Re Steinhardt Partners
green
1 sentence1996An example where waiver was found is In re Steinhardt Partners, L.P., 9 F.3d 230 (2d Cir. 1993), where Steinhardt disclosed documents to the SEC while he was under direct investigation for wrongdoing, although formal charges had not been filed. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.