8 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ansongreen2 sentences2013An example of this principle is set forth in Anson , which stated that a circuit court may not state "its opinion [that] the witness was being intimidated by the presence of several well-known gang members in the courtroom, if the presence and behavior of these individuals was not documented in the record." Anson, 282 Wis. 2d 629, ¶ 34 (emphasis in original). 2013Although a circuit court may make credibility determinations when making its factual findings, the case law indicates a circuit court may not rely on its personal knowledge of events not appearing in the record.37 A circuit court that relies on its own personal observations of events not in the record as the basis for a 37 An example of this principle is set forth in Anson, which stated that a circuit court may not state "its opinion [that] the witness was being intimidated by the presence of several well-known gang members in the courtroom, if the presence and behavior of these individuals wa | 2 | 2 |
Trinkle v. Schumacher Co.green2 sentences2011For an example of a clause that modified remedies for the breach of a warranty, see Trinkle v. Schumacher Co., 100 Wis. 2d 13, 14, 17-20 , 301 N.W.2d 255 , 256, 258-259 (Ct. App. 1980), which held, under the circumstances in that case, that the limitation was "unconscionable" — see Wis. Stat. § 402.719 (3). 2011For an example of a clause that modified remedies for the breach of a warranty, see Trinkle v. Schumacher Co., 100 Wis. 2d 13, 14, 17-20 , 301 N.W.2d 255 , 256, 258-259 (Ct. App. 1980), which held, under the circumstances in that case, that the limitation was "unconscionable" — see Wis. Stat. § 402.719 (3). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence2022A classic example of this defense tactic was addressed by the Indiana Supreme Court in Williams v. State, 681 N.E.2d 195 (Ind. 1997). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In Matter of Mental Condition of GOT
green
2 sentences2022An example of this principle in practice is provided by Rock County v. G.O.T., 151 Wis. 2d 629 , 631, 445 N.W.2d 697 (Ct. App. 1989). 2022An example of this principle in practice is provided by Rock County v. G.O.T., 151 Wis. 2d 629 , 631, 445 N.W.2d 697 (Ct. App. 1989). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences2018State v. Sullivan , 216 Wis. 2d 768 , 789-90, 576 N.W.2d 30 (citations omitted). ¶ 63 The submission of Exhibit 79 to the jury is an example of an error with such a substantial prejudicial impact that confidence in the result of the entire trial is undermined. ¶ 64 The circuit court aptly recounted the prejudicial nature of Exhibit 79. 2018State v. Sullivan , 216 Wis. 2d 768 , 789-90, 576 N.W.2d 30 (citations omitted). ¶ 63 The submission of Exhibit 79 to the jury is an example of an error with such a substantial prejudicial impact that confidence in the result of the entire trial is undermined. ¶ 64 The circuit court aptly recounted the prejudicial nature of Exhibit 79. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Wyatt Industries, Inc. v. Publicker Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence2011As a matter of historical interest, the author of Wyatt Industries, Inc. v. Publicker Industries, Inc., 420 F.2d 454 (5th Cir. 1969), was G. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Castro v. New York Life Insurance
green
1 sentence1996Co., 588 N.Y.S.2d 695 (N.Y. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake
green
2 sentences1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord 1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Town of Sutton v. Water Supply
neutral
2 sentences1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord 1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Terry v. Kolski
green
2 sentences1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord 1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Townsend v. Wisconsin Desert Horse Ass'n
green
2 sentences1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord 1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Hecker v. Gunderson
neutral
2 sentences1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord 1979Cf. 40 CFR, sec. 35.905-14. 4 Kegonsa’s claim for injunctive relief is moot, construction of the Stoughton disposal plant having already been completed. 5 Also see Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). 6 Town of Sutton v. Water Supply & Pollution Control Com’n, 116 N.H. 154, 156 , 355 A.2d 867 (1976). 7 Stoughton’s citation of this court’s holding in Hecker v. Gunderson, 245 Wis. 655, 663 , 15 N.W.2d 788 (1944), is not apropos. 8 Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake, 60 Wis.2d 640, 646 , 211 N.W. 2d 471 (1973), which involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of a zoning ord | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.