accident bar in Maryland

2015“Rather . . . we drew distinctions both between the requirements of notice and cooperation and between non-cooperation based on false statements made by the insured and non-cooperation based on the insured’s failure to attend depositions, hearings, or trial, or to assist in giving or obtaining evidence regarding the accident or claim.” Id.

2015“Rather ... we drew distinctions both between the requirements of notice and cooperation and between non-cooperation based on false statements made by the insured and noncooperation based on the insured’s failure to attend depositions, hearings, or trial, or to assist in giving or obtaining evidence regarding the accident or claim.” Id.

1992Morris v. Prince George’s County, 319 Md. 597, 604 , 573 A.2d 1346 (1990) (quoting Wilde v. Swanson, 314 Md. 80, 92 , 548 A.2d 837 (1988)).

1992Morris v. Prince George’s County, 319 Md. 597, 604 , 573 A.2d 1346 (1990) (quoting Wilde v. Swanson, 314 Md. 80, 92 , 548 A.2d 837 (1988)).

1992Morris v. Prince George’s County, 319 Md. 597, 604 , 573 A.2d 1346 (1990) (quoting Wilde v. Swanson, 314 Md. 80, 92 , 548 A.2d 837 (1988)).

1992Morris v. Prince George’s County, 319 Md. 597, 604 , 573 A.2d 1346 (1990) (quoting Wilde v. Swanson, 314 Md. 80, 92 , 548 A.2d 837 (1988)).

1988See, Schaub v. Community Cab, Inc., 198 Md. 216, 225 , 81 A.2d 597 (1950); Peterson v. Underwood, 258 Md. 9, 19 , 264 A.2d 851 (1970). 8 .

1988See, Schaub v. Community Cab, Inc., 198 Md. 216, 225 , 81 A.2d 597 (1950); Peterson v. Underwood, 258 Md. 9, 19 , 264 A.2d 851 (1970). 8 .

1983The case is quite analogous to Adams v. Board of Trustees, 215 Md. 188 , 137 A. 2d 151 , a pension case in which the rules applicable in *619 compensation cases were applied.

1983The case is quite analogous to Adams v. Board of Trustees, 215 Md. 188 , 137 A. 2d 151 , a pension case in which the rules applicable in *619 compensation cases were applied.

1975(Emphasis in original.) In Beasman v. Butler, 133 Md. 382 , 105 A. 409 (1918), there was evidence adduced tending to prove that the accident on which the claim was based was the result of an unsuccessful effort made by the claimant to climb on the side of a motor truck as it passed him on a roadway.

1975(Emphasis in original.) In Beasman v. Butler, 133 Md. 382 , 105 A. 409 (1918), there was evidence adduced tending to prove that the accident on which the claim was based was the result of an unsuccessful effort made by the claimant to climb on the side of a motor truck as it passed him on a roadway.

1973Whatever merit there may be in this argument, and we think, at best, it is minimal, it is emasculated by what we said in Leidenfrost v. Atlantic Masonry, Inc., 235 Md. 244, 250 , 201 A. 2d 336 (1964).

1973Whatever merit there may be in this argument, and we think, at best, it is minimal, it is emasculated by what we said in Leidenfrost v. Atlantic Masonry, Inc., 235 Md. 244, 250 , 201 A. 2d 336 (1964).

1963McCann argues that the cause of the accident was a violation of the boulevard law, when the Crum truck invaded the paved highway from a private driveway since, on these facts, under the provisions of Code (1957), Art. 66½, Sec. 234, and the case of Shriner v. Mullhausen, 210 Md. 104 , McCann was the favored driver, entitled to the right of way.

1948As *658 stated in Doherty v. Booth, 200 Mass. 522 , 86 N. E. 945 , where a rope which, if in proper condition, would be of ample tensile strength to sustain the strain for which it was intended, broke when it was subjected to ordinary •strain, the jury from their common experience could find that it would not have broken unless it had become unsound.

1948As *658 stated in Doherty v. Booth, 200 Mass. 522 , 86 N. E. 945 , where a rope which, if in proper condition, would be of ample tensile strength to sustain the strain for which it was intended, broke when it was subjected to ordinary •strain, the jury from their common experience could find that it would not have broken unless it had become unsound.

1939Since the adoption of section 209, the relative rights of operators of motor vehicles upon boulevards, as well as of those entering boulevards, have been considered by this court in three cases, viz; Binder v. Monaghan, 171 Md. 77 , 188 A. 31 ; Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 , and Greenfeld v. Hook, 177 Md. 166 , 8 A. 2nd 888.

1939Since the adoption of section 209, the relative rights of operators of motor vehicles upon boulevards, as well as of those entering boulevards, have been considered by this court in three cases, viz; Binder v. Monaghan, 171 Md. 77 , 188 A. 31 ; Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 , and Greenfeld v. Hook, 177 Md. 166 , 8 A. 2nd 888.

1939Since the adoption of section 209, the relative rights of operators of motor vehicles upon boulevards, as well as of those entering boulevards, have been considered by this court in three cases, viz; Binder v. Monaghan, 171 Md. 77 , 188 A. 31 ; Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 , and Greenfeld v. Hook, 177 Md. 166 , 8 A. 2nd 888.

1939Since the adoption of section 209, the relative rights of operators of motor vehicles upon boulevards, as well as of those entering boulevards, have been considered by this court in three cases, viz; Binder v. Monaghan, 171 Md. 77 , 188 A. 31 ; Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 , and Greenfeld v. Hook, 177 Md. 166 , 8 A. 2nd 888.