59 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1907–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.green2 sentences2026R.S. 23:1208 applies to any false statement made specifically for the purpose of obtaining benefits and “therefore generally becomes applicable at the time of an employee’s accident or claim.” Id. (quoting Resweber, 94-2708 at 1, 660 So.2d at 9 (emphasis added)). 2004R.S. 23:1208 "applies to any false statement or misrepresentation, including one concerning a prior injury, made specifically for the purpose of obtaining workers' compensation benefits and therefore generally becomes applicable at the time of an employee's accident or claim." Resweber, 660 So.2d at 9 (emphasis added). | 2 | 14 |
Parks v. Insurance Co. of North Americagreen2 sentences2003See Williams, 546 So.2d at 156 ; Parks v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 340 So.2d 276, 281 (La. 1976); Ferguson v. HDE, Inc., 270 So.2d 867, 870 (La.1972). 2002See Williams, 546 So.2d at 156 ; Parks v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 340 So.2d 276, 281 (La.1976); Ferguson v. HDE, Inc., 270 So.2d 867, 870 (La.1972). | 2 | 2 |
Sparks v. Tulane Med. Ctr. Hosp. & Clinicgreen2 sentences2003See Williams, 546 So.2d at 156 ; Parks v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 340 So.2d 276, 281 (La. 1976); Ferguson v. HDE, Inc., 270 So.2d 867, 870 (La.1972). 2002See Williams, 546 So.2d at 156 ; Parks v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 340 So.2d 276, 281 (La.1976); Ferguson v. HDE, Inc., 270 So.2d 867, 870 (La.1972). | 2 | 2 |
Ferguson v. HDE, Inc.green2 sentences2003See Williams, 546 So.2d at 156 ; Parks v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 340 So.2d 276, 281 (La. 1976); Ferguson v. HDE, Inc., 270 So.2d 867, 870 (La.1972). 2002See Williams, 546 So.2d at 156 ; Parks v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 340 So.2d 276, 281 (La.1976); Ferguson v. HDE, Inc., 270 So.2d 867, 870 (La.1972). | 2 | 2 |
Miller v. Marcantelgreen2 sentences2011Miller v. Marcantel, 221 So.2d 557, 559 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1969). 1990LSA-R.S. 22:655; Chennault v. Dupree, 398 So.2d 169 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1981); Miller v. Marcantel, supra. However, in a case almost identical in its facts to the instant case, a panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeal held that a showing of prejudice by the insured was not required in a failure to forward suit papers where a default judgment is taken against the insured before the insurer receives notice. | 1 | 3 |
Partin v. Merchants & Farmers Bankgreen2 sentences2011This of course differs from the determination of whether an “event” was unexpected or unforeseen under the accident requirement of subsection 1021(1), which is made by viewing the event from the employee’s perspective. 4 Id. 2003In fact, in Partin, 810 So.2d at 1126 , the supreme court expressly rejected such an analysis, explaining that, while the court in Sparks had limited the compensability of mental/mental claims through the "accident" requirement, "[u]nder the new law [the current version of La.R.S. 23:1021(7)(b) ], it is not necessary to limit mental/mental claims through the accident requirement [of La.R.S. 23:1021(1)]." Instead, "[t]he new law provided in subsection 1021(7)(b) supplies its own limitation by disallowing compensation for mental injuries unless they result from stress that, by its nature, is sud | 1 | 2 |
Housley v. Cerisegreen1 sentence2025See Housley v. Cerise, 579 So. 2d 973, 980 (La. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Lord v. Broussardgreen | 1 | 1 |
| McCormack v. Robingreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Voelkel v. State
green
2 sentences2003Middleton v. International Maintenance, 95-0238, pp. 6-7 (La.App. 1 Cir. 10/6/95), 671 So.2d 420, 424 , writ denied, 95-2682 (La.1/12/96), 667 So.2d 523 . 2003Middleton v. International Maintenance, 95-0238, pp. 6-7 (La.App. 1 Cir. 10/6/95), 671 So.2d 420, 424 , writ denied, 95-2682 (La.1/12/96), 667 So.2d 523 . | 6 | 2001–2003 |
Middleton v. International Maintenance
green
2 sentences2003Middleton v. International Maintenance, 95-0238, pp. 6-7 (La.App. 1 Cir. 10/6/95), 671 So.2d 420, 424 , writ denied, 95-2682 (La.1/12/96), 667 So.2d 523 . 2003Middleton v. International Maintenance, 95-0238, pp. 6-7 (La.App. 1 Cir. 10/6/95), 671 So.2d 420, 424 , writ denied, 95-2682 (La.1/12/96), 667 So.2d 523 . | 6 | 2001–2003 |
LeBlanc v. Grand Isle Shipyard, Inc.
green
2 sentences2000Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), 660 So.2d 7 ; Bass v. Allen Cannery Co., Inc., 30,635 (La.App.2d Cir.06/26/98), 715 So.2d 142 , writ denied, 98-2069 (La.11/06/98), 728 So.2d 395 ; Le-Blanc v. Grand Isle Shipyard, 95-2452 (La.App. 1st Cir.06/28/96), 676 So.2d 1157 . 1998Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 660 So.2d 7 (La. 1995); LeBlanc v. Grand Isle Shipyard, 95 2452 (La.App. 1st Cir. 6/28/96), 676 So.2d 1157 . | 2 | 1998–2000 |
Labarre v. Booth
neutral
2 sentences1959Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd., 232 La. 229 , 94 So.2d 241 ; Fox v. Haynes, La.App. 2 Cir., 86 So.2d 583 ; LaBarre v. Booth, La.App. 1 Cir., 84 So.2d 626 ; Saba v. Brown, La.App. 1958Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd., 232 La. 229 , 94 So.2d 241 ; Fox v. Haynes, La.App. 2 Cir., 86 So.2d 583 ; LaBarre v. Booth, La.App. 1 Cir., 84 So.2d 626 ; Saba v. Brown, La.App. | 2 | 1958–1959 |
Fox v. Haynes
neutral
2 sentences1959Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd., 232 La. 229 , 94 So.2d 241 ; Fox v. Haynes, La.App. 2 Cir., 86 So.2d 583 ; LaBarre v. Booth, La.App. 1 Cir., 84 So.2d 626 ; Saba v. Brown, La.App. 1958Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd., 232 La. 229 , 94 So.2d 241 ; Fox v. Haynes, La.App. 2 Cir., 86 So.2d 583 ; LaBarre v. Booth, La.App. 1 Cir., 84 So.2d 626 ; Saba v. Brown, La.App. | 2 | 1958–1959 |
Cassar v. Mansfield Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1959Co., La.App. 1 Cir., 67 So.2d 143 ; Graves v. Riser, La.App. 2 Cir., 62 So.2d 163 ; Day v. Roberts, La.App. 2 Cir., 55 So.2d 316 , or holding that the left-turning driver had the clear chance to avoid the accident, Cassar v. Mansfield Lumber Co., 215 La. 533 , 41 So.2d 209 . “(2) Cases holding that the negligence of the left-turning driver in doing so without signalling and/or yielding the right of way and/or observing the rear vehicle; and of the overtaking driver in not making sufficient observation and/or failing to slow and/or continuing to approach the turning vehicle at a high speed; bot 1959Co., La.App. 1 Cir., 67 So.2d 143 ; Graves v. Riser, La.App. 2 Cir., 62 So.2d 163 ; Day v. Roberts, La.App. 2 Cir., 55 So.2d 316 , or holding that the left-turning driver had the clear chance to avoid the accident, Cassar v. Mansfield Lumber Co., 215 La. 533 , 41 So.2d 209 . “(2) Cases holding that the negligence of the left-turning driver in doing so without signalling and/or yielding the right of way and/or observing the rear vehicle; and of the overtaking driver in not making sufficient observation and/or failing to slow and/or continuing to approach the turning vehicle at a high speed; bot | 2 | 1958–1959 |
Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Limited
green
2 sentences1959Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd., 232 La. 229 , 94 So.2d 241 ; Fox v. Haynes, La.App. 2 Cir., 86 So.2d 583 ; LaBarre v. Booth, La.App. 1 Cir., 84 So.2d 626 ; Saba v. Brown, La.App. 1959Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd., 232 La. 229 , 94 So.2d 241 ; Fox v. Haynes, La.App. 2 Cir., 86 So.2d 583 ; LaBarre v. Booth, La.App. 1 Cir., 84 So.2d 626 ; Saba v. Brown, La.App. | 2 | 1958–1959 |
Leonard v. James Indus. Constructors
green
1 sentence2026R.S. 23:1208 applies to any false statement made specifically for the purpose of obtaining benefits and “therefore generally becomes applicable at the time of an employee’s accident or claim.” Id. (quoting Resweber, 94-2708 at 1, 660 So.2d at 9 (emphasis added)). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Calhoun v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
green
1 sentence2010Id. (citing Sumrall v. Sumrall, 612 So.2d 1010 (La.App. 2 Cir.1993)). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Detraz v. Lee
green
1 sentence2010A plaintiff may be aided in meeting his burden of proof that a claimed injury or medical condition is caused by an accident by a presumption that the injury or condition was caused the accident if he establishes three things: (1) he must prove that he was in good health prior to the accident; (2) he must show that after the 115accident, the symptoms of the claimed injury appeared and continuously manifested themselves; and (3) the medical evidence shows there to be a reasonable possibility of causation between the accident and the claimed injury. 6 See Detraz v. Lee, 05-1263, pp. 4-5 (La.1/17/ | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Sumrall v. Sumrall
green
1 sentence2010Id. (citing Sumrall v. Sumrall, 612 So.2d 1010 (La.App. 2 Cir.1993)). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Harris v. Bancroft Bag, Inc.
green
1 sentence2008Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 7 ; Harris v. Bancroft Bag, Inc., 30,431 (La.App. 2d Cir.4/9/98), 714 So.2d 44 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Bias v. Vincent
green
1 sentence2008In Bias v. Vincent, 2002-642 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/02) , 832 So.2d 1153 , the Third Circuit Court held that plaintiff's attorney failed to establish that she took a step in the prosecution of plaintiff's accident claim where there was no evidence that plaintiff's answers to defendant's interrogatories and plaintiff's interrogatories were actually mailed to defendant's attorney. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Newman v. Richard Price Const.
green
1 sentence2007Newman v. Richard Price Const., 02-0995 (La.App. 1st Cir.8/8/03), 859 So.2d 136, 140 , citing Resweber v. Haroil Constr. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc.
green
1 sentence2006The supreme court further expounded on the exception to the "law in effect at the time of the accident principle" in Frith, 892 So.2d at 15 , explaining that the exception, which applies in situations involving a "triggering mechanism" that occurs after the accident, cannot be applied to divest injured employees of their right to indemnity benefits under the law in effect at the time of the work-related accident, absent some affirmative act on the employee's part that results in forfeiture of benefits. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Fisher v. Westbank Roofing
neutral
1 sentence2005Such an interpretation of the law is illogical and we reject it.” Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc.
green
1 sentence2005Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc., 2003-C-3024, p. 5 (La.7/2/04), 877 So.2d 89, 94 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Bass v. Allen Cannery Co., Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2000Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), 660 So.2d 7 ; Bass v. Allen Cannery Co., Inc., 30,635 (La.App.2d Cir.06/26/98), 715 So.2d 142 , writ denied, 98-2069 (La.11/06/98), 728 So.2d 395 ; Le-Blanc v. Grand Isle Shipyard, 95-2452 (La.App. 1st Cir.06/28/96), 676 So.2d 1157 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Bass v. Allen Cannery Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence2000Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), 660 So.2d 7 ; Bass v. Allen Cannery Co., Inc., 30,635 (La.App.2d Cir.06/26/98), 715 So.2d 142 , writ denied, 98-2069 (La.11/06/98), 728 So.2d 395 ; Le-Blanc v. Grand Isle Shipyard, 95-2452 (La.App. 1st Cir.06/28/96), 676 So.2d 1157 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
JE Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Butler
neutral
2 sentences1998Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Butler, 97-361 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/30/97) , 700 So.2d 1111 , this court stated as follows: LSA-R.S. 23:1208 applies to any false statement or misrepresentation, including one concerning a prior injury, made specifically for the purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits and therefore generally becomes applicable at the time of an employee’s accident or claim. 1998Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Butler, 97-361 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/30/97) , 700 So.2d 1111 , this court stated as follows: LSA-R.S. 23:1208 applies to any false statement or misrepresentation, including one concerning a prior injury, made specifically for the purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits and therefore generally becomes applicable at the time of an employee’s accident or claim. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1996Howard v. Allstate Insurance Co., 520 So.2d 715 (La.1988) and Kleinpeter v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections, 509 So.2d 56 (La.App. 1st Cir.1987). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Kleinpeter v. State ex rel. Department of Corrections
neutral
1 sentence1996Howard v. Allstate Insurance Co., 520 So.2d 715 (La.1988) and Kleinpeter v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections, 509 So.2d 56 (La.App. 1st Cir.1987). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Freyou v. Marquette Casualty Company
green
1 sentence1994As to the refusal to cooperate, we agree with Freyou v. Marquette Casualty Co., La., 149 So.2d 697 , each case rests on its own facts and circumstances, moreover, The purpose of the cooperation clause is to require the insured to disclose all of the facts within his knowledge, and otherwise aid the company to determine its liability under the policy. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Kinchen v. Dixie Auto Ins. Co. green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Wallace v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Jackson v. Virginia red | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Chennault v. Dupree neutral | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Tooley v. Pennison neutral | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Terrio v. Terrio neutral | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Thibodeaux v. Parks Equipment Company green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Whipple v. Smith green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Whipple v. Smith green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Lindsey v. HA Lott, Inc. green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Adams v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc. neutral | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Womack v. Pickett green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| Theunissen v. Guidry green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Sizeler v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. neutral | 1 | 1967–1967 |
| Parks v. Hall green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Casano v. Cook neutral | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Nyman v. Monteleone-Iberville Garage, Inc. green | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.