accident defense (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

accident defense in Idaho

5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1957–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Nastoffgreen
idahoctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015In her view the accident defense amounts to an argument that Hopkins “acted without forming the mental state necessary to commit the crime.” She concedes that the court defined “maliciously,” but argues that “there was no instruction given with regards to the required intent.” As to the sufficiency of the evidence, Hopkins cites State v. Nastoff, 124 Idaho 667, 668 , 862 P.2d 1089, 1090 (Ct.App.1993), for the proposition that the State was required to prove that she intended to injure the property and contends that there is insufficient evidence of that intent.

2015In her view the accident defense amounts to an argument that Hopkins “acted without forming the mental state necessary to commit the crime.” She concedes that the court defined “maliciously,” but argues that “there was no instruction given with regards to the required intent.” As to the sufficiency of the evidence, Hopkins cites State v. Nastoff, 124 Idaho 667, 668 , 862 P.2d 1089, 1090 (Ct.App.1993), for the proposition that the State was required to prove that she intended to injure the property and contends that there is insufficient evidence of that intent.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Gonzales green
calctapp · 1999
2 sentences

2006People v. Gonzales, 74 Cal.App.4th 382, 390 , 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 111 (Cal.App.1999) (citations omitted).

2006People v. Gonzales, 74 Cal.App.4th 382, 390 , 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 111 (Cal.App.1999) (citations omitted).

12006–2006
Reyes v. Kit Manufacturing Co. green
idaho · 1998
2 sentences

2002Id.

2002Id.

12002–2002
Smith v. City of Preston green
idaho · 1978
2 sentences

1989Here the city had notice of both the accident and the claim. 99 Idaho at 621-622 , 586 P.2d at 1065-1066 .

1989Here the city had notice of both the accident and the claim. 99 Idaho at 621-622 , 586 P.2d at 1065-1066 .

11989–1989
Behrens v. State green
neb · 1941
2 sentences

1957Olson v. State, 36 Ariz. 294 , 285 P. 282 ; Behrens v. State, 140 Neb. 671 , 1 N.W.2d 289 ; Scott v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 100 , 233 S.W. 1097 , 16 A.L.R. 1420 .

1957Olson v. State, 36 Ariz. 294 , 285 P. 282 ; Behrens v. State, 140 Neb. 671 , 1 N.W.2d 289 ; Scott v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 100 , 233 S.W. 1097 , 16 A.L.R. 1420 .

11957–1957
Olson v. State green
ariz · 1930
2 sentences

1957Olson v. State, 36 Ariz. 294 , 285 P. 282 ; Behrens v. State, 140 Neb. 671 , 1 N.W.2d 289 ; Scott v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 100 , 233 S.W. 1097 , 16 A.L.R. 1420 .

1957Olson v. State, 36 Ariz. 294 , 285 P. 282 ; Behrens v. State, 140 Neb. 671 , 1 N.W.2d 289 ; Scott v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 100 , 233 S.W. 1097 , 16 A.L.R. 1420 .

11957–1957
Scott v. State green
texcrimapp · 1921
2 sentences

1957Olson v. State, 36 Ariz. 294 , 285 P. 282 ; Behrens v. State, 140 Neb. 671 , 1 N.W.2d 289 ; Scott v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 100 , 233 S.W. 1097 , 16 A.L.R. 1420 .

1957Olson v. State, 36 Ariz. 294 , 285 P. 282 ; Behrens v. State, 140 Neb. 671 , 1 N.W.2d 289 ; Scott v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 100 , 233 S.W. 1097 , 16 A.L.R. 1420 .

11957–1957

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 18-201 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 92 (1919–2026) NY 76 (1901–2026) GA 71 (1962–2026) LA 59 (1907–2026) OH 52 (1929–2026) PA 45 (1932–2023) MI 43 (1903–2026) MA 32 (1927–2026) MO 27 (1883–2019) IL 24 (1927–2026) MS 24 (1932–2026) IN 15 (1950–2023) VA 14 (1929–2025) MN 14 (1971–2024) MD 13 (1939–2015) FL 13 (1932–2021) NJ 13 (1912–2006) TX 12 (1972–2019) NC 12 (1936–2021) SC 11 (1971–2025) AZ 10 (1967–2024) WI 9 (1923–2025) CT 7 (1973–2012) KY 7 (1952–1977) WY 6 (1970–2017) NH 6 (1973–1999) ME 6 (1977–2013) UT 5 (1938–1994) NE 5 (1945–1982) KS 5 (1926–2018) NM 5 (1944–2025) ID 5 (1957–2015) AL 5 (1985–2017) RI 5 (1983–2016) WV 4 (1961–2022) DC 4 (1962–1990) SD 4 (1938–2026) OR 4 (1972–2021) WA 4 (2000–2026) MT 3 (1978–2003) IA 3 (1924–1947) CO 3 (1909–2005) AK 3 (1971–1988) TN 2 (1975–2004) DE 2 (1989–2008) ND 2 (1995–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check