12 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.green2 sentences2007Id. at 762. 2007Id. at 762. | 2 | 2 |
Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance Companygreen1 sentence2024R.S. 9:5605(E)." Id. at 629 (emphasis supplied.) The Court began its analysis of the plaintiff's allegations by noting that, under La. | 1 | 1 |
Bostock v. Clayton Countygreen1 sentence2023Id. at 1739. 22-CA-424 6 From the ordinary meanings of the words at the time of the law’s adoption, the Court determined that a straightforward rule emerges: An employer violates Title VII when it intentionally fires an individual employee based in part on sex. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Prado Navarette v. California
green
2 sentences2014Id., 134 S.Ct. at p. 1688 . 2014Id., 134 S.Ct. at p. 1688 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Walls v. American Optical Corp.
green
1 sentence2001R.S. 1:2 is not necessary in this case, however, because we are not addressing the temporal effect of an amendment to a section of the Revised Statutes, but are instead addressing such effect of an amendment to a Civil Code article. [7] In Walls v. American Optical Corp., 98-0455 (La.9/8/99), 740 So.2d 1262 , this court began its analysis with a formula set out by Planiol for identifying the only two situations in which a law operates retroactively. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Schiller Park Colonial Inn, Inc. v. Berz
green
2 sentences1999The court began its analysis by noting that "the nature of the liquor industry [was] a prime consideration in judging the validity of [the statute at issue]." Schiller Park, 349 N.E.2d at 65 . 1999Further, "the business of selling intoxicating liquor is `attended with danger to the community' and is `closely related to certain evils in society.'" Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Costello v. United States
green
2 sentences1998In Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 , 76 S.Ct. 406 , 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956), the Court denied a challenge to an indictment allegedly based on hearsay evidence. 1998In Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 , 76 S.Ct. 406 , 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956), the Court denied a challenge to an indictment allegedly based on hearsay evidence. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Tarkanian
green
2 sentences1997Tarkanian, 488 U.S. at 192 , 109 S.Ct. at 462 . 1997Tarkanian, 488 U.S. at 192 , 109 S.Ct. at 462 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence1993Finally, in Guillory v. Ventre, 610 So.2d 1056 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 992 (La.1993), the third circuit again affirmed the lower court's judgment finding no abuse of discretion; however, in this case the lower court's ruling excluded the child's tuition at a private school from the father's monthly child support obligation. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Guillory v. Ventre
green
1 sentence1993Finally, in Guillory v. Ventre, 610 So.2d 1056 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 992 (La.1993), the third circuit again affirmed the lower court's judgment finding no abuse of discretion; however, in this case the lower court's ruling excluded the child's tuition at a private school from the father's monthly child support obligation. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Dempsey v. Stevens
green
2 sentences1993In Dempsey v. Stevens, 611 So.2d 815 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992), the court began its analysis by noting that "the trial court has the discretionary authority to consider private school expenses when computing the total child support obligation." The court then reviewed the evidence presented and concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the father to pay a pro rata share of private school tuition since the evidence proved that the child's "successful continuation of her education in a proven academic environment is in her best interest." 611 So.2d at 818 . 1993In Dempsey v. Stevens, 611 So.2d 815 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992), the court began its analysis by noting that "the trial court has the discretionary authority to consider private school expenses when computing the total child support obligation." The court then reviewed the evidence presented and concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the father to pay a pro rata share of private school tuition since the evidence proved that the child's "successful continuation of her education in a proven academic environment is in her best interest." 611 So.2d at 818 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Rose v. Clark
green
2 sentences1990The Court began its analysis by stating that "while there are some errors to which Chapman does not apply, they are the exception rather than the rule." 478 U.S. at 578 , 106 S.Ct. at 3106 . 1990The Court began its analysis by stating that "while there are some errors to which Chapman does not apply, they are the exception rather than the rule." 478 U.S. at 578 , 106 S.Ct. at 3106 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Fontenot v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
green
2 sentences1989The trial court began its analysis by stating that this case is reminiscent of Fontenot v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 227 La. 866 , 80 So.2d 845 (1955). 1989The trial court began its analysis by stating that this case is reminiscent of Fontenot v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 227 La. 866 , 80 So.2d 845 (1955). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.