Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax Commissiongreen1 sentence1997The court began its analysis by stating, “Whether petitioner was injured in the scope and course of her employment presents a question of law which, absent a grant of discretion, this court reviews for correctness.” Drake, 904 P.2d at 205 (citing Morton Int’l, Inc. v. Auditing Div. of State Tax Comm’n, 814 P.2d 581, 588 (Utah 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Stokes v. Board of Review of Industrial Commissiongreen1 sentence1997The court then relied specifically upon Stokes v. Industrial Commission, 832 P.2d 56, 58 (Utah.Ct.App.1992), which found that the Commission did not have any discretion to interpret or apply the Workers’ Compensation Act. 5 The court then concluded from the facts of the case that Drake’s accident did occur while she was still on a special errand. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Calandra
green
2 sentences1999The Court stated that "the application of the rule has been restricted to those areas where its remedial objectives are thought most efficaciously served." Id. at 348 , 94 S.Ct. 613 . 1999The Court stated that "the application of the rule has been restricted to those areas where its remedial objectives are thought most efficaciously served." Id. at 348 , 94 S.Ct. 613 . | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Bountiful City v. Swenson
green
1 sentence2024And it asserted that interpreting “the no-contact provision in a way that does not include physical contact but only addresses verbal contact would be an interpretation contrary to common understanding . . . .” In response, Swenson countered that the City had a burden “to prove that [he] clearly violated the explicit terms of the protective order,” and he pointed out that no provision “in the protective order . . . says [he] must stay [away] from [Brooke] personally.” 20230430-CA 5 2024 UT App 133 Bountiful City v. Swenson ¶12 At the conclusion of the hearing, the court again interpreted the p | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Bagnes
green
2 sentences2020In State v. Bagnes, 2014 UT 4 , 322 P.3d 719 , the court began its analysis by noting that “[t]he term ‘lewdness’ is not defined by statute,” and concluded that the term should be given its ordinary meaning. 2020In State v. Bagnes, 2014 UT 4 , 322 P.3d 719 , the court began its analysis by noting that “[t]he term ‘lewdness’ is not defined by statute,” and concluded that the term should be given its ordinary meaning. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
California v. Carney
green
2 sentences2016Id. (first citing California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386, 890-91 , 105 S.Ct. 2066 , 85 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985); then citing Carroll, 267 U.S. 182 , 45 S.Ct. 280 ). 2016Id. (first citing California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386, 890-91 , 105 S.Ct. 2066 , 85 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985); then citing Carroll, 267 U.S. 182 , 45 S.Ct. 280 ). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Carroll v. United States
green
1 sentence2016Id. (first citing California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386, 890-91 , 105 S.Ct. 2066 , 85 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985); then citing Carroll, 267 U.S. 182 , 45 S.Ct. 280 ). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Pennsylvania v. Labron
green
1 sentence2016Id. (first citing California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386, 890-91 , 105 S.Ct. 2066 , 85 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985); then citing Carroll, 267 U.S. 182 , 45 S.Ct. 280 ). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Drake v. Industrial Com'n of Utah
neutral
1 sentence1997The court began its analysis by stating, “Whether petitioner was injured in the scope and course of her employment presents a question of law which, absent a grant of discretion, this court reviews for correctness.” Drake, 904 P.2d at 205 (citing Morton Int’l, Inc. v. Auditing Div. of State Tax Comm’n, 814 P.2d 581, 588 (Utah 1991)). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Gardiner
green
2 sentences1997Id. at 572 . 1997Id. at 572 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.