12 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McHenrygreen1 sentence1999See also, State v. McHenry, 573 So.2d 590 (La.App. 2d Cir.1991) (failure to advise defendant of the right to a jury trial precludes a finding that the guilty plea was knowingly and intelligently entered). | 1 | 1 |
Dunn v. Land and Marine Properties, Inc.green1 sentence1996Accordingly, the court held that the "contracts" were null and void ab initio. [7] In Dunn v. Land and Marine Properties, Inc., 609 So.2d 284, 290 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992), the contract of representation at issue specifically called for Land and Marine Properties, Inc. "to perform all necessary administrative and legal work, including pursuit of litigation if necessary." The court held that the contract was null on its face because there was no question as to whether the services to be performed constituted the practice of law. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Breaux
green
1 sentence2018Similarly, in State v. Breaux , 08-1061 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/1/09) , 6 So.3d 982 , the trial court failed to properly sequester the jury, but a panel of this court determined the error was harmless. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Franklin
green
2 sentences2013In State v. Franklin, 11-216 (La.App. 5 Cir. 12/28/11) , 87 So.3d 860 , writ denied, 12-337 (La.9/12/12), 98 So.3d 811 , wherein the punishment for the offense required hard labor, the court determined that the error was harmless arid required no correction. 2013In State v. Franklin, 11-216 (La.App. 5 Cir. 12/28/11) , 87 So.3d 860 , writ denied, 12-337 (La.9/12/12), 98 So.3d 811 , wherein the punishment for the offense required hard labor, the court determined that the error was harmless arid required no correction. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State ex rel. Wetzel v. State
green
1 sentence2013In State v. Franklin, 11-216 (La.App. 5 Cir. 12/28/11) , 87 So.3d 860 , writ denied, 12-337 (La.9/12/12), 98 So.3d 811 , wherein the punishment for the offense required hard labor, the court determined that the error was harmless arid required no correction. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Ennis
neutral
2 sentences2011The decision rests on the sound discretion of the trial court and cannot be overturned absent an abuse of that discretion under State v. Ennis, 03-1491 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/7/04) , 877 So.2d 300 . 2011The decision rests on the sound discretion of the trial court and cannot be overturned absent an abuse of that discretion under State v. Ennis, 03-1491 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/7/04) , 877 So.2d 300 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Keaty v. Raspanti
green
1 sentence2008Mr. Horrell cites Keaty v. Raspanti, 00-0221 (La.App. 4 Cir.2/7/01), 781 So.2d 607 , wherein, this Court determined whether a claim for sanctions was time-barred. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Ervin
green
1 sentence2001App. 5 Cir. 9/28/99), 746 So.2d 95, 103 , writ denied in State v. Patterson, 99-3217 (La.4/20/00), 760 So.2d 342 , this Court determined that defense counsels' objections of, "Please note my objection to the excessiveness of the sentences ...." and "Note my objection to the sentencing, Your Honor," were insufficient to satisfy the requirements of Article 881.1. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Hester
green
1 sentence2001App. 5 Cir. 9/28/99), 746 So.2d 95, 103 , writ denied in State v. Patterson, 99-3217 (La.4/20/00), 760 So.2d 342 , this Court determined that defense counsels' objections of, "Please note my objection to the excessiveness of the sentences ...." and "Note my objection to the sentencing, Your Honor," were insufficient to satisfy the requirements of Article 881.1. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Barnes v. Thames
green
1 sentence1998The trial judge had instructed the jury to disregard and not consider any reference to a settlement by counsel, and the court determined that the instruction "was a sufficient remedy to overcome any prejudicial effect on the jury." Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1996Co., 469 So.2d 967 (La.1985), the court determined the factors that should be considered when ascertaining comparative fault. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Segura v. Frank
green
1 sentence1994The court expressly noted that "[e]ven though a lower court has adjudicated a claim and rendered judgment, the claim continues to be pending until appeal of that judgment has been exhausted." Segura v. Frank, 630 So.2d at 727 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Brown v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1980In Brown v. Louisiana, 447 U.S. 323 , 100 S.Ct. 2214 , 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980), the Court determined that the rule of Burch was fundamental to the integrity of the fact-finding process, and thus required retroactive application, at least to cases still pending on direct review. 1980In Brown v. Louisiana, 447 U.S. 323 , 100 S.Ct. 2214 , 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980), the Court determined that the rule of Burch was fundamental to the integrity of the fact-finding process, and thus required retroactive application, at least to cases still pending on direct review. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Fontenot v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
neutral
1 sentence1977The legal proposition espoused in Favalora, supra, was re-affirmed although distinguished in Fontenot v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 166 So.2d 299 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1964) and in Slack v. Fleet, 242 So.2d 650 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1970). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Slack v. Fleet
green
1 sentence1977The legal proposition espoused in Favalora, supra, was re-affirmed although distinguished in Fontenot v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 166 So.2d 299 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1964) and in Slack v. Fleet, 242 So.2d 650 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1970). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.