7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hamill v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See, e.g., Hamill v. State , 948 P.2d 1356 , 1358-59 (Wyo. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Teague v. Lanegreen2 sentences1991See for example, in federal law, Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , reh'g denied 490 U.S. 1031 , 109 S.Ct. 1771 , 104 L.Ed.2d 206 (1989) and Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2878 , 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). 1991See for example, in federal law, Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , reh'g denied 490 U.S. 1031 , 109 S.Ct. 1771 , 104 L.Ed.2d 206 (1989) and Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2878 , 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Hardygreen2 sentences1991See for example, in federal law, Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , reh'g denied 490 U.S. 1031 , 109 S.Ct. 1771 , 104 L.Ed.2d 206 (1989) and Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2878 , 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). 1991See for example, in federal law, Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , reh'g denied 490 U.S. 1031 , 109 S.Ct. 1771 , 104 L.Ed.2d 206 (1989) and Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2878 , 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
McNeil v. Springfield Park Districtgreen2 sentences1991See for example, in federal law, Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , reh’g denied 490 U.S. 1031 , 109 S.Ct. 1771 , 104 L.Ed.2d 206 (1989) and Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2878 , 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). 1991See for example, in federal law, Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , reh'g denied 490 U.S. 1031 , 109 S.Ct. 1771 , 104 L.Ed.2d 206 (1989) and Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2878 , 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Goodman v. Stategreen1 sentence1979The same rule has been recently discussed in Goodman v. State, Wyo., 573 P.2d 400, 402, 407 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Lackey
green
1 sentence2021Id. at 1227 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
United States v. William David Lively
green
1 sentence1995Lively, 803 F.2d at 1128 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Schroeder v. Board of Review
neutral
1 sentence1993In considering the requirement for an adjudicatory hearing in a New Jersey delinquency action where the alleged delinquent’s speedy trial rights were implicated, the court determined that a requirement to schedule a hearing within thirty days was a “calendaring device to constantly remind juvenile court judges that detention cases must move expeditiously and with priority.” State In Interest of C.B., 173 N.J.Su *1150 per. 424, 414 A.2d 572 , 574, cert denied, 84 N.J. 482 , 420 A.2d 1303 (1980). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State, in Interest of Cb
green
1 sentence1993In considering the requirement for an adjudicatory hearing in a New Jersey delinquency action where the alleged delinquent’s speedy trial rights were implicated, the court determined that a requirement to schedule a hearing within thirty days was a “calendaring device to constantly remind juvenile court judges that detention cases must move expeditiously and with priority.” State In Interest of C.B., 173 N.J.Su *1150 per. 424, 414 A.2d 572 , 574, cert denied, 84 N.J. 482 , 420 A.2d 1303 (1980). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State, in Interest of Cb
neutral
1 sentence1993In considering the requirement for an adjudicatory hearing in a New Jersey delinquency action where the alleged delinquent’s speedy trial rights were implicated, the court determined that a requirement to schedule a hearing within thirty days was a “calendaring device to constantly remind juvenile court judges that detention cases must move expeditiously and with priority.” State In Interest of C.B., 173 N.J.Su *1150 per. 424, 414 A.2d 572 , 574, cert denied, 84 N.J. 482 , 420 A.2d 1303 (1980). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Schmid v. Miller
neutral
2 sentences1982The case of Schmid v. Miller, Alaska, 619 P.2d 1 (1980) is also instructive. 1982The case of Schmid v. Miller, Alaska, 619 P.2d 1 (1980) is also instructive. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Gustavenson v. State
green
2 sentences1979In Gustavenson v. State, 1902, 10 Wyo. 300 , 68 P. 1006 , this court determined that such instruction was only proper in a case involving specific intent. 1979In Gustavenson v. State, 1902, 10 Wyo. 300 , 68 P. 1006 , this court determined that such instruction was only proper in a case involving specific intent. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.