Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1941–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Estrellagreen2 sentences2018On the basis of similar facts, the court in People v. Estrella , 31 Cal.App.4th 716 , 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 383 , 386-87 (1995), concluded that an "unmarked" vehicle was "distinctively marked" within the meaning of California's aggravating fleeing statute, Cal. Vehicle Code § 2800.1 (a)(3) (2006): "We find it incredible to believe or even seriously argue that a reasonable person, upon seeing a vehicle in pursuit with flashing red and blue lights, wigwag headlights and hearing a siren, would have any doubt that said pursuit vehicle was a police vehicle." Estrella , 37 Cal.Rptr.2d at 386, 388 (distingu 2018On the basis of similar facts, the court in People v. Estrella , 31 Cal.App.4th 716 , 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 383 , 386-87 (1995), concluded that an "unmarked" vehicle was "distinctively marked" within the meaning of California's aggravating fleeing statute, Cal. Vehicle Code § 2800.1 (a)(3) (2006): "We find it incredible to believe or even seriously argue that a reasonable person, upon seeing a vehicle in pursuit with flashing red and blue lights, wigwag headlights and hearing a siren, would have any doubt that said pursuit vehicle was a police vehicle." Estrella , 37 Cal.Rptr.2d at 386, 388 (distingu | 1 | 1 |
Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.green2 sentences2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc. 2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
Time, Inc. v. Hillgreen1 sentence2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.green1 sentence2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Greenegreen2 sentences2000Such abuse of discretion will not be presumed; it must be affirmatively established.” State v. Greene, 92 N.M. 347, 349 , 588 P.2d 548, 550 (1978) (citations omitted.) We examine the facts of this ease in the light of this standard of review. 2000Such abuse of discretion will not be presumed; it must be affirmatively established.” State v. Greene, 92 N.M. 347, 349 , 588 P.2d 548, 550 (1978) (citations omitted.) We examine the facts of this ease in the light of this standard of review. | 1 | 1 |
North Carolina v. Pearcered2 sentences2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would 2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Jacksongreen2 sentences2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would 2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would | 1 | 1 |
Bordenkircher v. Hayesgreen2 sentences2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would 2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would | 1 | 1 |
Thurston v. Stategreen1 sentence2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Goodwingreen2 sentences2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would 2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Andrews v. Stallings
green
2 sentences2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc. 2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Alabama v. Smith
green
2 sentences2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would 2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Callaway v. Olguin
neutral
2 sentences1972Callaway v. Olguin, 83 N.M. 767 , 497 P.2d 978 (Ct.App.1972). 1972Callaway v. Olguin, 83 N.M. 767 , 497 P.2d 978 (Ct.App.1972). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Hickman v. Mylander
green
2 sentences1971Since the case of Hickman v. Mylander, 68 N.M. 340 , 362 P.2d 500 (1961), this court, with an exception or two, has consistently held the trial court, in ruling on a motion and making findings under Rule 41(b), supra, may properly weigh all of the evidence and give to it such weight as the court believes it deserves. 1971Since the case of Hickman v. Mylander, 68 N.M. 340 , 362 P.2d 500 (1961), this court, with an exception or two, has consistently held the trial court, in ruling on a motion and making findings under Rule 41(b), supra, may properly weigh all of the evidence and give to it such weight as the court believes it deserves. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
First National Bank v. Stover
green
1 sentence1967Cf. Gebby v. Carrillo, 25 N.M. 120 , 177 P. 894 ; First Nat’l Bank v. Stover, 21 N.M. 453 , 155 P. 905 , L.R.A.1916D, 1280. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Gebby v. Carrillo
neutral
2 sentences1967Cf. Gebby v. Carrillo, 25 N.M. 120 , 177 P. 894 ; First Nat’l Bank v. Stover, 21 N.M. 453 , 155 P. 905 , L.R.A.1916D, 1280. 1967Cf. Gebby v. Carrillo, 25 N.M. 120 , 177 P. 894 ; First Nat’l Bank v. Stover, 21 N.M. 453 , 155 P. 905 , L.R.A.1916D, 1280. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Winter v. Hutchins
neutral
2 sentences1967In the light of the principle that the question of good faith is one for the trier of the facts, Winter v. Hutchins, 20 Idaho 749 , 119 P. 883 ; Seaside Nat’l Bank v. Allen, 35 Ariz. 302 , 277 P. 68 , we cannot agree that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in its conclusion. 1967In the light of the principle that the question of good faith is one for the trier of the facts, Winter v. Hutchins, 20 Idaho 749 , 119 P. 883 ; Seaside Nat’l Bank v. Allen, 35 Ariz. 302 , 277 P. 68 , we cannot agree that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in its conclusion. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Seaside National Bank v. Allen
neutral
2 sentences1967In the light of the principle that the question of good faith is one for the trier of the facts, Winter v. Hutchins, 20 Idaho 749 , 119 P. 883 ; Seaside Nat’l Bank v. Allen, 35 Ariz. 302 , 277 P. 68 , we cannot agree that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in its conclusion. 1967In the light of the principle that the question of good faith is one for the trier of the facts, Winter v. Hutchins, 20 Idaho 749 , 119 P. 883 ; Seaside Nat’l Bank v. Allen, 35 Ariz. 302 , 277 P. 68 , we cannot agree that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in its conclusion. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
green
2 sentences1965Among other things, the letter said: “The formula price therein contained is $52.36 x 2,010.52 acres, divided by 2, for an undivided half interest, which sum is $52,635.42.” There was also attached to the complaint a letter from defendants to the escrow agent, reading: “The purpose of this letter is to instruct you not to deliver the deed in your possession to Mr. Rubenstein or Mr. Rosenthal since I have informed them that it is impossible to complete this matter.” A complaint which is challenged for failure to state a cause of action is to be examined in the light of the rule that all facts w 1965Among other things, the letter said: “The formula price therein contained is $52.36 x 2,010.52 acres, divided by 2, for an undivided half interest, which sum is $52,635.42.” There was also attached to the complaint a letter from defendants to the escrow agent, reading: “The purpose of this letter is to instruct you not to deliver the deed in your possession to Mr. Rubenstein or Mr. Rosenthal since I have informed them that it is impossible to complete this matter.” A complaint which is challenged for failure to state a cause of action is to be examined in the light of the rule that all facts w | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Fullerton v. Kaune
green
2 sentences1965Among other things, the letter said: “The formula price therein contained is $52.36 x 2,010.52 acres, divided by 2, for an undivided half interest, which sum is $52,635.42.” There was also attached to the complaint a letter from defendants to the escrow agent, reading: “The purpose of this letter is to instruct you not to deliver the deed in your possession to Mr. Rubenstein or Mr. Rosenthal since I have informed them that it is impossible to complete this matter.” A complaint which is challenged for failure to state a cause of action is to be examined in the light of the rule that all facts w 1965Among other things, the letter said: “The formula price therein contained is $52.36 x 2,010.52 acres, divided by 2, for an undivided half interest, which sum is $52,635.42.” There was also attached to the complaint a letter from defendants to the escrow agent, reading: “The purpose of this letter is to instruct you not to deliver the deed in your possession to Mr. Rubenstein or Mr. Rosenthal since I have informed them that it is impossible to complete this matter.” A complaint which is challenged for failure to state a cause of action is to be examined in the light of the rule that all facts w | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace
green
2 sentences1963Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt, 70 N.M. 182 , 372 P.2d 378 ; Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3 , 27 P.2d 984 . 1963Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt, 70 N.M. 182 , 372 P.2d 378 ; Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3 , 27 P.2d 984 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt
green
2 sentences1963Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt, 70 N.M. 182 , 372 P.2d 378 ; Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3 , 27 P.2d 984 . 1963Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt, 70 N.M. 182 , 372 P.2d 378 ; Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3 , 27 P.2d 984 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Adams v. Cox
green
2 sentences1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 . 1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co.
green
2 sentences1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 . 1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Chavez v. Sedillo
green
2 sentences1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 . 1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant
green
2 sentences1960As was said in Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant, 48 N.M. 340 , 151 P.2d 48, 53 , “conclusions of law must be predicated upon, and supported by, findings of fact.” The case is very similar to Jontz v. Alderete, 64 N.M. 163 , 326 P.2d 95 , except in that case the trial court concluded that neither plaintiff nor defendant were negligent and that the accident was unavoidable. 1960As was said in Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant, 48 N.M. 340 , 151 P.2d 48, 53 , “conclusions of law must be predicated upon, and supported by, findings of fact.” The case is very similar to Jontz v. Alderete, 64 N.M. 163 , 326 P.2d 95 , except in that case the trial court concluded that neither plaintiff nor defendant were negligent and that the accident was unavoidable. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
State v. Patten
green
2 sentences1960In State v. Patten, 41 N.M. 395 , 69 P.2d 931, 933 , and followed by a long line of decisions, this court has held that every presumption not inconsistent with the record, is to be indulged in favor of the jurisdiction of courts of general jurisdiction whose judgments are collaterally attacked; and their judgments, though void for want of jurisdiction and would be so held on direct attack, cannot be questioned on that ground when attacked collaterally, unless the lack of jurisdiction appears affirmatively in the judgment roll. 1960In State v. Patten, 41 N.M. 395 , 69 P.2d 931, 933 , and followed by a long line of decisions, this court has held that every presumption not inconsistent with the record, is to be indulged in favor of the jurisdiction of courts of general jurisdiction whose judgments are collaterally attacked; and their judgments, though void for want of jurisdiction and would be so held on direct attack, cannot be questioned on that ground when attacked collaterally, unless the lack of jurisdiction appears affirmatively in the judgment roll. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Jontz v. Alderete
green
2 sentences1960As was said in Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant, 48 N.M. 340 , 151 P.2d 48, 53 , “conclusions of law must be predicated upon, and supported by, findings of fact.” The case is very similar to Jontz v. Alderete, 64 N.M. 163 , 326 P.2d 95 , except in that case the trial court concluded that neither plaintiff nor defendant were negligent and that the accident was unavoidable. 1960As was said in Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant, 48 N.M. 340 , 151 P.2d 48, 53 , “conclusions of law must be predicated upon, and supported by, findings of fact.” The case is very similar to Jontz v. Alderete, 64 N.M. 163 , 326 P.2d 95 , except in that case the trial court concluded that neither plaintiff nor defendant were negligent and that the accident was unavoidable. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Smith & Ricker v. Hill Bros.
green
2 sentences1941The possibility of it or of the existence of other facts resulting in the nullity of one of the deeds abstracted is to be weighed, as pointed out in Cahill v. Seitz, supra, in the light of the rule that "the presumption is in favor of legal conduct, and not in favor of violations of obligations." See also Smith Ricker v. Hill Bros., 17 N.M. 415 , 134 P. 243 , and Shaw v. Board of Education, 38 N.M. 298 , 31 P.2d 993 , 93 A.L.R. 432 . 1941The possibility of it or of the existence of other facts resulting in the nullity of one of the deeds abstracted is to be weighed, as pointed out in Cahill v. Seitz, supra, in the light of the rule that "the presumption is in favor of legal conduct, and not in favor of violations of obligations." See also Smith Ricker v. Hill Bros., 17 N.M. 415 , 134 P. 243 , and Shaw v. Board of Education, 38 N.M. 298 , 31 P.2d 993 , 93 A.L.R. 432 . | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Shaw v. Board of Education
green
2 sentences1941The possibility of it or of the existence of other facts resulting in the nullity of one of the deeds abstracted is to be weighed, as pointed out in Cahill v. Seitz, supra, in the light of the rule that "the presumption is in favor of legal conduct, and not in favor of violations of obligations." See also Smith Ricker v. Hill Bros., 17 N.M. 415 , 134 P. 243 , and Shaw v. Board of Education, 38 N.M. 298 , 31 P.2d 993 , 93 A.L.R. 432 . 1941The possibility of it or of the existence of other facts resulting in the nullity of one of the deeds abstracted is to be weighed, as pointed out in Cahill v. Seitz, supra, in the light of the rule that "the presumption is in favor of legal conduct, and not in favor of violations of obligations." See also Smith Ricker v. Hill Bros., 17 N.M. 415 , 134 P. 243 , and Shaw v. Board of Education, 38 N.M. 298 , 31 P.2d 993 , 93 A.L.R. 432 . | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.