light rule (New Mexico) · Go Syfert
← New Mexico issues

light rule in New Mexico

12 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1941–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Estrellagreen
calctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018On the basis of similar facts, the court in People v. Estrella , 31 Cal.App.4th 716 , 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 383 , 386-87 (1995), concluded that an "unmarked" vehicle was "distinctively marked" within the meaning of California's aggravating fleeing statute, Cal. Vehicle Code § 2800.1 (a)(3) (2006): "We find it incredible to believe or even seriously argue that a reasonable person, upon seeing a vehicle in pursuit with flashing red and blue lights, wigwag headlights and hearing a siren, would have any doubt that said pursuit vehicle was a police vehicle." Estrella , 37 Cal.Rptr.2d at 386, 388 (distingu

2018On the basis of similar facts, the court in People v. Estrella , 31 Cal.App.4th 716 , 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 383 , 386-87 (1995), concluded that an "unmarked" vehicle was "distinctively marked" within the meaning of California's aggravating fleeing statute, Cal. Vehicle Code § 2800.1 (a)(3) (2006): "We find it incredible to believe or even seriously argue that a reasonable person, upon seeing a vehicle in pursuit with flashing red and blue lights, wigwag headlights and hearing a siren, would have any doubt that said pursuit vehicle was a police vehicle." Estrella , 37 Cal.Rptr.2d at 386, 388 (distingu

11
Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.green
nmctapp · 1977 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc.

2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc.

11
Time, Inc. v. Hillgreen
scotus · 1967 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc.

11
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.green
scotus · 1974 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc.

11
State v. Greenegreen
nm · 1978 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000Such abuse of discretion will not be presumed; it must be affirmatively established.” State v. Greene, 92 N.M. 347, 349 , 588 P.2d 548, 550 (1978) (citations omitted.) We examine the facts of this ease in the light of this standard of review.

2000Such abuse of discretion will not be presumed; it must be affirmatively established.” State v. Greene, 92 N.M. 347, 349 , 588 P.2d 548, 550 (1978) (citations omitted.) We examine the facts of this ease in the light of this standard of review.

11
North Carolina v. Pearcered
scotus · 1969 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

11
United States v. Jacksongreen
scotus · 1968 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

11
Bordenkircher v. Hayesgreen
scotus · 1978 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

11
Thurston v. Stategreen
moctapp · 1990 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

11
United States v. Goodwingreen
scotus · 1982 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (20)

CaseCitedYears
Andrews v. Stallings green
nmctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc.

2017Notably for purposes of this 18 appeal, plaintiffs deemed public officials “must hurdle the same constitutionally- 19 based limitations on false light recovery as apply to defamation claims.” Andrews v. 20 Stallings, 1995-NMCA-015 , ¶ 59, 119 N.M. 478 , 892 P.2d 611 ; see also Restatement 7 1 (Second) of Torts § 652E (1977) (providing that a false light claim is actionable only 2 if “the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the 3 publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed”); see also 4 id. cmt. d (explaining that in Time, Inc.

12017–2017
Alabama v. Smith green
scotus · 1989
2 sentences

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

2000DISCUSSION {7} “A practice which discourages the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty, which deters the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial and which chills the assertion of these constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them is patently unconstitutional.” Thurston v. State, 791 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Mo.App.1990) (citing United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (“If the provision had no other purpose or effect than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it would

12000–2000
Callaway v. Olguin neutral
nmctapp · 1972
2 sentences

1972Callaway v. Olguin, 83 N.M. 767 , 497 P.2d 978 (Ct.App.1972).

1972Callaway v. Olguin, 83 N.M. 767 , 497 P.2d 978 (Ct.App.1972).

11972–1972
Hickman v. Mylander green
nm · 1961
2 sentences

1971Since the case of Hickman v. Mylander, 68 N.M. 340 , 362 P.2d 500 (1961), this court, with an exception or two, has consistently held the trial court, in ruling on a motion and making findings under Rule 41(b), supra, may properly weigh all of the evidence and give to it such weight as the court believes it deserves.

1971Since the case of Hickman v. Mylander, 68 N.M. 340 , 362 P.2d 500 (1961), this court, with an exception or two, has consistently held the trial court, in ruling on a motion and making findings under Rule 41(b), supra, may properly weigh all of the evidence and give to it such weight as the court believes it deserves.

11971–1971
First National Bank v. Stover green
nm · 1915
1 sentence

1967Cf. Gebby v. Carrillo, 25 N.M. 120 , 177 P. 894 ; First Nat’l Bank v. Stover, 21 N.M. 453 , 155 P. 905 , L.R.A.1916D, 1280.

11967–1967
Gebby v. Carrillo neutral
nm · 1918
2 sentences

1967Cf. Gebby v. Carrillo, 25 N.M. 120 , 177 P. 894 ; First Nat’l Bank v. Stover, 21 N.M. 453 , 155 P. 905 , L.R.A.1916D, 1280.

1967Cf. Gebby v. Carrillo, 25 N.M. 120 , 177 P. 894 ; First Nat’l Bank v. Stover, 21 N.M. 453 , 155 P. 905 , L.R.A.1916D, 1280.

11967–1967
Winter v. Hutchins neutral
idaho · 1911
2 sentences

1967In the light of the principle that the question of good faith is one for the trier of the facts, Winter v. Hutchins, 20 Idaho 749 , 119 P. 883 ; Seaside Nat’l Bank v. Allen, 35 Ariz. 302 , 277 P. 68 , we cannot agree that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in its conclusion.

1967In the light of the principle that the question of good faith is one for the trier of the facts, Winter v. Hutchins, 20 Idaho 749 , 119 P. 883 ; Seaside Nat’l Bank v. Allen, 35 Ariz. 302 , 277 P. 68 , we cannot agree that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in its conclusion.

11967–1967
Seaside National Bank v. Allen neutral
ariz · 1929
2 sentences

1967In the light of the principle that the question of good faith is one for the trier of the facts, Winter v. Hutchins, 20 Idaho 749 , 119 P. 883 ; Seaside Nat’l Bank v. Allen, 35 Ariz. 302 , 277 P. 68 , we cannot agree that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in its conclusion.

1967In the light of the principle that the question of good faith is one for the trier of the facts, Winter v. Hutchins, 20 Idaho 749 , 119 P. 883 ; Seaside Nat’l Bank v. Allen, 35 Ariz. 302 , 277 P. 68 , we cannot agree that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in its conclusion.

11967–1967
Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company green
nm · 1961
2 sentences

1965Among other things, the letter said: “The formula price therein contained is $52.36 x 2,010.52 acres, divided by 2, for an undivided half interest, which sum is $52,635.42.” There was also attached to the complaint a letter from defendants to the escrow agent, reading: “The purpose of this letter is to instruct you not to deliver the deed in your possession to Mr. Rubenstein or Mr. Rosenthal since I have informed them that it is impossible to complete this matter.” A complaint which is challenged for failure to state a cause of action is to be examined in the light of the rule that all facts w

1965Among other things, the letter said: “The formula price therein contained is $52.36 x 2,010.52 acres, divided by 2, for an undivided half interest, which sum is $52,635.42.” There was also attached to the complaint a letter from defendants to the escrow agent, reading: “The purpose of this letter is to instruct you not to deliver the deed in your possession to Mr. Rubenstein or Mr. Rosenthal since I have informed them that it is impossible to complete this matter.” A complaint which is challenged for failure to state a cause of action is to be examined in the light of the rule that all facts w

11965–1965
Fullerton v. Kaune green
nm · 1963
2 sentences

1965Among other things, the letter said: “The formula price therein contained is $52.36 x 2,010.52 acres, divided by 2, for an undivided half interest, which sum is $52,635.42.” There was also attached to the complaint a letter from defendants to the escrow agent, reading: “The purpose of this letter is to instruct you not to deliver the deed in your possession to Mr. Rubenstein or Mr. Rosenthal since I have informed them that it is impossible to complete this matter.” A complaint which is challenged for failure to state a cause of action is to be examined in the light of the rule that all facts w

1965Among other things, the letter said: “The formula price therein contained is $52.36 x 2,010.52 acres, divided by 2, for an undivided half interest, which sum is $52,635.42.” There was also attached to the complaint a letter from defendants to the escrow agent, reading: “The purpose of this letter is to instruct you not to deliver the deed in your possession to Mr. Rubenstein or Mr. Rosenthal since I have informed them that it is impossible to complete this matter.” A complaint which is challenged for failure to state a cause of action is to be examined in the light of the rule that all facts w

11965–1965
Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace green
nm · 1933
2 sentences

1963Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt, 70 N.M. 182 , 372 P.2d 378 ; Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3 , 27 P.2d 984 .

1963Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt, 70 N.M. 182 , 372 P.2d 378 ; Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3 , 27 P.2d 984 .

11963–1963
Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt green
nm · 1962
2 sentences

1963Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt, 70 N.M. 182 , 372 P.2d 378 ; Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3 , 27 P.2d 984 .

1963Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. Pruitt, 70 N.M. 182 , 372 P.2d 378 ; Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace, 38 N.M. 3 , 27 P.2d 984 .

11963–1963
Adams v. Cox green
nm · 1948
2 sentences

1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 .

1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 .

11961–1961
Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co. green
nm · 1943
2 sentences

1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 .

1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 .

11961–1961
Chavez v. Sedillo green
nm · 1955
2 sentences

1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 .

1961Chavez v. Sedillo, 59 N.M. 357 , 284 P.2d 1026 ; Adams v. Cox, 52 N.M. 56 , 191 P.2d 352 ; Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co., 47 N.M. 329 , 142 P.2d 919 , 153 A.L.R. 273 .

11961–1961
Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant green
nm · 1944
2 sentences

1960As was said in Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant, 48 N.M. 340 , 151 P.2d 48, 53 , “conclusions of law must be predicated upon, and supported by, findings of fact.” The case is very similar to Jontz v. Alderete, 64 N.M. 163 , 326 P.2d 95 , except in that case the trial court concluded that neither plaintiff nor defendant were negligent and that the accident was unavoidable.

1960As was said in Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant, 48 N.M. 340 , 151 P.2d 48, 53 , “conclusions of law must be predicated upon, and supported by, findings of fact.” The case is very similar to Jontz v. Alderete, 64 N.M. 163 , 326 P.2d 95 , except in that case the trial court concluded that neither plaintiff nor defendant were negligent and that the accident was unavoidable.

11960–1960
State v. Patten green
nm · 1937
2 sentences

1960In State v. Patten, 41 N.M. 395 , 69 P.2d 931, 933 , and followed by a long line of decisions, this court has held that every presumption not inconsistent with the record, is to be indulged in favor of the jurisdiction of courts of general jurisdiction whose judgments are collaterally attacked; and their judgments, though void for want of jurisdiction and would be so held on direct attack, cannot be questioned on that ground when attacked collaterally, unless the lack of jurisdiction appears affirmatively in the judgment roll.

1960In State v. Patten, 41 N.M. 395 , 69 P.2d 931, 933 , and followed by a long line of decisions, this court has held that every presumption not inconsistent with the record, is to be indulged in favor of the jurisdiction of courts of general jurisdiction whose judgments are collaterally attacked; and their judgments, though void for want of jurisdiction and would be so held on direct attack, cannot be questioned on that ground when attacked collaterally, unless the lack of jurisdiction appears affirmatively in the judgment roll.

11960–1960
Jontz v. Alderete green
nm · 1958
2 sentences

1960As was said in Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant, 48 N.M. 340 , 151 P.2d 48, 53 , “conclusions of law must be predicated upon, and supported by, findings of fact.” The case is very similar to Jontz v. Alderete, 64 N.M. 163 , 326 P.2d 95 , except in that case the trial court concluded that neither plaintiff nor defendant were negligent and that the accident was unavoidable.

1960As was said in Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. Grant, 48 N.M. 340 , 151 P.2d 48, 53 , “conclusions of law must be predicated upon, and supported by, findings of fact.” The case is very similar to Jontz v. Alderete, 64 N.M. 163 , 326 P.2d 95 , except in that case the trial court concluded that neither plaintiff nor defendant were negligent and that the accident was unavoidable.

11960–1960
Smith & Ricker v. Hill Bros. green
· 1913
2 sentences

1941The possibility of it or of the existence of other facts resulting in the nullity of one of the deeds abstracted is to be weighed, as pointed out in Cahill v. Seitz, supra, in the light of the rule that "the presumption is in favor of legal conduct, and not in favor of violations of obligations." See also Smith Ricker v. Hill Bros., 17 N.M. 415 , 134 P. 243 , and Shaw v. Board of Education, 38 N.M. 298 , 31 P.2d 993 , 93 A.L.R. 432 .

1941The possibility of it or of the existence of other facts resulting in the nullity of one of the deeds abstracted is to be weighed, as pointed out in Cahill v. Seitz, supra, in the light of the rule that "the presumption is in favor of legal conduct, and not in favor of violations of obligations." See also Smith Ricker v. Hill Bros., 17 N.M. 415 , 134 P. 243 , and Shaw v. Board of Education, 38 N.M. 298 , 31 P.2d 993 , 93 A.L.R. 432 .

11941–1941
Shaw v. Board of Education green
nm · 1934
2 sentences

1941The possibility of it or of the existence of other facts resulting in the nullity of one of the deeds abstracted is to be weighed, as pointed out in Cahill v. Seitz, supra, in the light of the rule that "the presumption is in favor of legal conduct, and not in favor of violations of obligations." See also Smith Ricker v. Hill Bros., 17 N.M. 415 , 134 P. 243 , and Shaw v. Board of Education, 38 N.M. 298 , 31 P.2d 993 , 93 A.L.R. 432 .

1941The possibility of it or of the existence of other facts resulting in the nullity of one of the deeds abstracted is to be weighed, as pointed out in Cahill v. Seitz, supra, in the light of the rule that "the presumption is in favor of legal conduct, and not in favor of violations of obligations." See also Smith Ricker v. Hill Bros., 17 N.M. 415 , 134 P. 243 , and Shaw v. Board of Education, 38 N.M. 298 , 31 P.2d 993 , 93 A.L.R. 432 .

11941–1941

Where else courts name it

CA 181 (1892–2026) NY 87 (1872–2021) TX 75 (1911–2024) IL 62 (1880–2026) PA 53 (1907–2025) NE 42 (1887–2022) FL 32 (1915–2009) NC 32 (1899–2026) MI 30 (1914–2022) AL 28 (1909–2013) MO 27 (1898–2008) OR 26 (1893–2014) LA 25 (1937–2016) TN 23 (1956–2022) GA 21 (1902–2025) NJ 20 (1949–2026) MA 20 (1857–2007) OK 19 (1907–2020) IA 18 (1872–2018) CT 18 (1921–2017) SC 15 (1940–1975) IN 15 (1864–2015) NV 15 (1914–2017) KY 14 (1908–2026) MD 14 (1928–2022) SD 13 (1922–2009) WA 12 (1911–2020) NM 12 (1941–2018) ID 12 (1912–2001) OH 12 (1918–2023) AZ 11 (1966–2026) UT 10 (1955–2025) KS 10 (1896–1989) ME 8 (1975–2012) WI 7 (1900–1988) MN 7 (1906–1965) CO 7 (1894–1973) MS 6 (1916–2004) HI 5 (1963–2022) MT 5 (1910–1938) ND 5 (1905–1952) WY 5 (1923–1991) RI 4 (1962–1983) DE 4 (1961–1964) AR 4 (1934–1977) DC 4 (1943–1985) WV 3 (1959–2013) VA 3 (1909–2008) NH 2 (1975–1981) PR 2 (1929–1937) VT 2 (1962–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check