exemption clause (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

exemption clause in Louisiana

11 Louisiana opinions name it 3 courts 1936–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
City of Port Allen v. Louisiana Mun. Risk green
la · 1983
2 sentences

2003City of Port Allen v. Louisiana Risk Management, et al ., 439 So.2d 399 (La. 1983) and Attorney General Opinion No. 90-651.

2001City of Port Allen v. Louisiana Risk Management, et al ., 439 So.2d 399 (La. 1983); Op.Atty.Gen.

61996–2003
Vento v. Amici neutral
lactapp · 1935
2 sentences

1936“The first question submitted for our instructions is: ‘Is the pursuit or occupation of farming a “trade” or “profession,” within the meaning of article 2705 of the Civil Code and article 644 of the Code of Practice ?’ “It is provided under article 2705 that ‘the lessor has, for the payment of his rent, * * * a right of pledge on the movable effects of the lessee, which are found on the property leased. * * * But the lessee shall be entitled to retain! out of the property subjected by law to the lessor’s privilege, * * * the tools and instruments necessary for the exercise of the trade or prof

1936The first question submitted for our instruction is: “Is the pursuit or occupation of farming a ‘trade’ or ‘profession,’ within the meaning of article 2705 of the Civil Code and article 644 of the Code of Practice ?” It is provided under article 2705 that “the lessor has, for the payment of his rent, * * * a right of pledge on the movable effects of the lessee, which are found on the property leased. * * * But the lessee shall be entitled to retain, out of the property subjected by law to the lessor’s privilege, * * * the tools and instruments necessary for the exercise of the trade or profess

21936–1936
A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Ricard neutral
la · 1928
2 sentences

1936A. Wilbert’s Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Ricard, 167 La. 416 , 119 So. 411 ; Sliman et al. v. Fish, 177 La. 38 , 147 So. 493 .

1936A. Wilbert’s Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Ricard, 167 La. 416 , 119 So. 411 ; Sliman et al. v. Fish, 177 La. 38 , 147 So. 493 .

21936–1936
Sliman v. Fish green
la · 1933
2 sentences

1936A. Wilbert’s Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Ricard, 167 La. 416 , 119 So. 411 ; Sliman et al. v. Fish, 177 La. 38 , 147 So. 493 .

1936A. Wilbert’s Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Ricard, 167 La. 416 , 119 So. 411 ; Sliman et al. v. Fish, 177 La. 38 , 147 So. 493 .

21936–1936
Meyers v. Flournoy green
la · 1946
1 sentence

2007Id. at 603-604 .

12007–2007
Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Tax Commission green
la · 1940
2 sentences

1997If we held otherwise, the exemption clause of the Constitution would place "no limitation upon the power and authority of the Legislature to exempt property from taxation." Id., 195 La. at 65 , 196 So. 15 .

1997If we held otherwise, the exemption clause of the Constitution would place "no limitation upon the power and authority of the Legislature to exempt property from taxation." Id., 195 La. at 65 , 196 So. 15 .

11997–1997
Lusco v. McNeese green
lactapp · 1956
1 sentence

1961Lusco v. McNeese, La.App. 1 Cir., 86 So.2d 226 ; Meadows v. Preferred Acc. Ins.

11961–1961

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 3 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 76 (1893–2026) PA 39 (1930–2019) IL 38 (1874–2023) NJ 37 (1900–2025) NY 32 (1892–2024) TX 30 (1925–2019) WA 27 (1895–2025) OH 23 (1926–2026) FL 20 (1882–2024) AL 20 (1884–2004) MI 19 (1931–2023) AR 18 (1898–2024) MD 17 (1929–2016) OK 15 (1929–2023) CT 14 (1912–2026) TN 14 (1877–2018) MO 13 (1893–2009) OR 12 (1916–2022) NM 11 (1941–2015) LA 11 (1936–2007) MA 10 (1930–2012) IA 9 (1928–2025) IN 9 (1980–2016) NC 9 (1921–2016) VA 8 (1912–2016) RI 8 (1897–2008) GA 8 (1935–2022) MS 8 (1995–2016) KS 8 (1895–2022) CO 7 (1906–2015) WV 7 (1960–2026) NE 7 (1922–2024) MT 7 (1929–2021) MN 6 (1877–1996) UT 6 (1991–2024) WI 6 (1928–2023) VT 5 (1929–2005) NV 4 (1977–2017) DC 4 (1976–2024) KY 4 (1921–2017) ME 3 (2004–2016) SD 3 (1894–1989) SC 3 (1988–2024) PR 2 (1929–1950) WY 2 (1987–2004) HI 2 (1893–1985) ID 2 (1958–2014) DE 2 (1995–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check