insurer claim (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

insurer claim in Alabama

10 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1929–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
White v. Drivasgreen
alacivapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009Co. v. Baldwin County Home Builders Ass’n, 770 So.2d 72, 75 (Ala.2000) (holding that if conflicting inferences can be drawn from the evidence, the question of the reasonableness of an insured’s delay in giving notice to the insurer of a claim is to be submitted to the trier of fact); Shriners Hosps. for Crippled Children v. Robbins, 450 So.2d 798, 802 (Ala.1984) (holding that the reasonableness of the trustees’ delay in turning over trust assets to the trust beneficiary was a question of fact to be resolved by the trier of fact); Parker v. King, 402 So.2d 877, 879 (Ala.1981) (citing approvingl

11
State v. Tillettgreen
fladistctapp · 1959 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009Co. v. Baldwin County Home Builders Ass’n, 770 So.2d 72, 75 (Ala.2000) (holding that if conflicting inferences can be drawn from the evidence, the question of the reasonableness of an insured’s delay in giving notice to the insurer of a claim is to be submitted to the trier of fact); Shriners Hosps. for Crippled Children v. Robbins, 450 So.2d 798, 802 (Ala.1984) (holding that the reasonableness of the trustees’ delay in turning over trust assets to the trust beneficiary was a question of fact to be resolved by the trier of fact); Parker v. King, 402 So.2d 877, 879 (Ala.1981) (citing approvingl

11
US Fidelity v. Baldwin County Home Buildersgreen
ala · 2000 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009Co. v. Baldwin County Home Builders Ass’n, 770 So.2d 72, 75 (Ala.2000) (holding that if conflicting inferences can be drawn from the evidence, the question of the reasonableness of an insured’s delay in giving notice to the insurer of a claim is to be submitted to the trier of fact); Shriners Hosps. for Crippled Children v. Robbins, 450 So.2d 798, 802 (Ala.1984) (holding that the reasonableness of the trustees’ delay in turning over trust assets to the trust beneficiary was a question of fact to be resolved by the trier of fact); Parker v. King, 402 So.2d 877, 879 (Ala.1981) (citing approvingl

11
Parker v. Kinggreen
ala · 1981 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009Co. v. Baldwin County Home Builders Ass’n, 770 So.2d 72, 75 (Ala.2000) (holding that if conflicting inferences can be drawn from the evidence, the question of the reasonableness of an insured’s delay in giving notice to the insurer of a claim is to be submitted to the trier of fact); Shriners Hosps. for Crippled Children v. Robbins, 450 So.2d 798, 802 (Ala.1984) (holding that the reasonableness of the trustees’ delay in turning over trust assets to the trust beneficiary was a question of fact to be resolved by the trier of fact); Parker v. King, 402 So.2d 877, 879 (Ala.1981) (citing approvingl

11
Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. Robbinsgreen
ala · 1984 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009Co. v. Baldwin County Home Builders Ass’n, 770 So.2d 72, 75 (Ala.2000) (holding that if conflicting inferences can be drawn from the evidence, the question of the reasonableness of an insured’s delay in giving notice to the insurer of a claim is to be submitted to the trier of fact); Shriners Hosps. for Crippled Children v. Robbins, 450 So.2d 798, 802 (Ala.1984) (holding that the reasonableness of the trustees’ delay in turning over trust assets to the trust beneficiary was a question of fact to be resolved by the trier of fact); Parker v. King, 402 So.2d 877, 879 (Ala.1981) (citing approvingl

11
cluster 594404green
ca5 · 1993 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004We need not and do not decide, however, whether (a) the absolute warranty arises if the vessel is at sea at the inception of the time policy, or (b) an insurer may claim benefit of the absolute warranty of seaworthiness implied at the inception of the risk if the condition of unseaworthiness does not cause the particular loss." Employers Ins. , 978 F.2d at 1436 (footnote omitted).

11
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Beaversgreen
ala · 1992 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999In Beavers , the insured's attorney informed the insurer only that a claim might be made for underinsured-motorist benefits. 611 So.2d at 349, 353 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
L & S Roofing Supply Co. v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE green
ala · 1987
2 sentences

2009This Court disagreed and adopted a standard of “enhanced obligation of good faith,” 521 So.2d at 1304 , that the insurer and defense counsel retained by it must follow.

2002Because of the potential conflicts inherent in such an arrangement, the enhanced duty of good faith "put[s] in place a procedure by which the insured can be confident that his interests will not be compromised nor in any way subordinated to those of the insurer as a result of the defense he is required to accept under the contract of insurance." L S Roofing , 521 So.2d at 1304 .

22002–2009
Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. green
wash · 1986
2 sentences

2009This Court adopted the enhanced-good-faith standard established by the Washington Supreme Court in Tank v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 105 Wash.2d 381 , 715 P.2d 1133 (1986), and quoted extensively from that opinion: “ ‘This enhanced obligation [of good faith] is fulfilled by meeting specific criteria.

2009This Court adopted the enhanced-good-faith standard established by the Washington Supreme Court in Tank v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 105 Wash.2d 381 , 715 P.2d 1133 (1986), and quoted extensively from that opinion: “ ‘This enhanced obligation [of good faith] is fulfilled by meeting specific criteria.

12009–2009
St. Paul Insurance Companies, a Corporation v. Talladega Nursing Home, Inc. green
ca5 · 1979
1 sentence

1987Cos., supra, and held that "even if the insurance contracts required defendants to indemnify and defend plaintiff in the earlier action, such contract [sic] would be void in Alabama as against public policy." Thus, apparently, there has been no factual determination as to whether the contracts in question obligate the insurer to provide a defense against the specific claims alleged in this case.

11987–1987
Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of New York v. Blackwell green
· 1954
2 sentences

1966Co. of New York v. Blackwell, 260 Ala. 463 , 71 So.2d 267 .

1966Co. of New York v. Blackwell, 260 Ala. 463 , 71 So.2d 267 .

11966–1966
General Insurance Company of America v. Killen neutral
ala · 1960
2 sentences

1960In General Insurance Company of America v. Killen, 270 Ala. 604 , 120 So. 2d 887, 895 , the court reviewed the law in this state applicable to waiver by acceptance of premiums, saying: “The basic principle is declared to be as follows: “ ‘The acceptance of premiums by the insurer, with knowledge of a breach of condition or ground for forfeiture, ordinarily constitutes a waiver or estoppel.’ 45 C.J.S.

1960In General Insurance Company of America v. Killen, 270 Ala. 604 , 120 So. 2d 887, 895 , the court reviewed the law in this state applicable to waiver by acceptance of premiums, saying: “The basic principle is declared to be as follows: “ ‘The acceptance of premiums by the insurer, with knowledge of a breach of condition or ground for forfeiture, ordinarily constitutes a waiver or estoppel.’ 45 C.J.S.

11960–1960
Yorkshire Ins. Co. v. Gazis green
ala · 1929
2 sentences

1934Co., Limited, v. Gazis, 219 Ala. 96 , 121 So. 84 , “that an agent authorized to write policies of fire insurance is a general agent in so far as to bind the insurer by his waiver of conditions and warranties inserted in the policy for the insurer’s benefit,” the Court of Appeals correctly held said replications were free from demurrable defects.

1934Co., Limited, v. Gazis, 219 Ala. 96 , 121 So. 84 , “that an agent authorized to write policies of fire insurance is a general agent in so far as to bind the insurer by his waiver of conditions and warranties inserted in the policy for the insurer’s benefit,” the Court of Appeals correctly held said replications were free from demurrable defects.

11934–1934
Aetna Fire Ins. v. Kennedy green
ala · 1909
2 sentences

1929Co. v. Kennedy, 161 Ala. 600 , 50 So. 73 , 135 Am.

1929Co. v. Kennedy, 161 Ala. 600 , 50 So. 73 , 135 Am.

11929–1929

Where else courts name it

CA 98 (1936–2025) IL 58 (1902–2026) NY 46 (1947–2024) FL 37 (1936–2024) MI 34 (1978–2025) TX 32 (1935–2019) LA 30 (1932–2011) WI 27 (1923–2025) OH 22 (1963–2025) MO 21 (1926–2020) GA 20 (1907–2023) PA 20 (1950–2026) MN 18 (1976–2019) OK 18 (1918–2014) WA 18 (1987–2024) CT 18 (1971–2018) NJ 17 (1968–2024) AZ 16 (1977–2025) MA 15 (1973–2025) AL 10 (1929–2009) NM 10 (1948–2012) CO 10 (1992–2015) KS 9 (1942–2004) DE 8 (1988–2022) MD 7 (1972–2021) MT 7 (1983–2022) IN 7 (1957–2015) OR 7 (1957–2020) MS 6 (1971–2023) WV 6 (1961–2011) ID 6 (1966–2019) NC 6 (1961–2021) SD 5 (2009–2019) TN 5 (1964–2011) NE 5 (1941–2000) SC 5 (1939–2013) UT 5 (1938–2025) NV 4 (1932–2009) AK 4 (1990–2017) IA 4 (1918–2006) KY 4 (2006–2024) DC 4 (1974–2014) WY 3 (1980–1996) RI 3 (1994–2009) ME 3 (2009–2015) AR 2 (1914–1938) ND 2 (1994–2006) NH 2 (1979–1999) VA 2 (1987–1995) HI 2 (1924–1994)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check