Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cedell v. Farmers Insurancegreen2 sentences2019Cedell, 176 Wn.2d at 696, 699-700 . 2019Cedell, 176 Wn.2d at 696, 699-700 . | 2 | 2 |
Unigard Insurance v. Levengreen2 sentences2008See Leven, 97 Wn. 2008See Leven, 97 Wash. App. at 427 , 983 P.2d 1155 ; Griffin, 108 Wash.App. at 140 , 29 P.3d 777 ; Canron, Inc. v. Fed. | 2 | 2 |
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Barcomgreen2 sentences2000See Barcom, 112 Wn.2d at 583-84 . 2000See Barcom, 112 Wash.2d at 583-84 , 773 P.2d 56 . | 2 | 2 |
Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.green1 sentence2017These obligations, including defense counsel's duty of loyalty and of full and ongoing disclosure, arise due to "the potential conflicts of interest between insurer and insured inherent in this type of defense." Id. at 387 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Berger v. Dishman Dodge, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013For the proposition that an "innocent insured" must be excused for delays attributable to the insurer or defense counsel, Studio Seven relies primarily on White and Berger, 50 Wn. 2013Little, 160 Wn.2d at 703 ; Griggs, 92 Wn.2d at 582 . ¶27 For the proposition that an “innocent insured” must be excused for delays attributable to the insurer or defense counsel, Studio Seven relies primarily on White and Berger, 50 Wn. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCE
green
2 sentences1996App. 151 , 660 P.2d 307 , review denied, 99 Wn.2d 1011 (1983), the policy required notice of a claim to be given "as soon as practical.” The plaintiffs did not notify the insurer of its claim for almost five years. 1996Ass'n, 34 Wash.App. 151 , 660 P.2d 307 , review denied, 99 Wash.2d 1011 (1983), the policy required notice of a claim to be given "as soon as practical." The plaintiffs did not notify the insurer of its claim for almost five years. | 2 | 1996–1996 |
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Morris
green
1 sentence2024Morris explains the background principle that, traditionally, the cooperation clause in an insurance policy forbids an insured from settling without 21 No. 85400-3-I/22 the insurer’s consent, but this will govern “only claims for which the insurer unconditionally assumes liability under the policy.” 154 Ariz. at 119 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
cluster 558160
green
1 sentence2022Ed. 2d 903 (2012) (“If we were to adopt Taniguchi’s suggested analysis, a plaintiff could file lawsuits against an insured defendant ‘without incurring litigation costs after losing on the merits.’ In essence, Taniguchi’s reasoning punishes a prevailing party for being insured.” (citation omitted) (quoting Manor Healthcare Corp. v. Lomelo, 929 F.2d 633 , 639–40 (11th Cir. 19991))). 19 No. 83333-2-I/20 an insurer provides a defense and says that this argument should also be rejected as unsupported. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Little v. King
green
1 sentence2013Little, 160 Wn.2d at 703 ; Griggs, 92 Wn.2d at 582 . ¶27 For the proposition that an “innocent insured” must be excused for delays attributable to the insurer or defense counsel, Studio Seven relies primarily on White and Berger, 50 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013Little, 160 Wn.2d at 703 ; Griggs, 92 Wn.2d at 582 . ¶27 For the proposition that an “innocent insured” must be excused for delays attributable to the insurer or defense counsel, Studio Seven relies primarily on White and Berger, 50 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. PLATEAU 44
green
1 sentence2008Jacob's Meadow, 139 Wash.App. at 768 , 162 P.3d 1153 . ¶ 18 These equitable principles favor Hartford. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Griffin v. Allstate Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2008See Leven, 97 Wash. App. at 427 , 983 P.2d 1155 ; Griffin, 108 Wash.App. at 140 , 29 P.3d 777 ; Canron, Inc. v. Fed. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Griffin v. Allstate Insurance
green
1 sentence2008See Leven, 97 Wash. App. at 427 , 983 P.2d 1155 ; Griffin, 108 Wash.App. at 140 , 29 P.3d 777 ; Canron, Inc. v. Fed. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. Plateau 44 II, LLC
green
1 sentence2008Jacob's Meadow, 139 Wash.App. at 768 , 162 P.3d 1153 . ¶ 18 These equitable principles favor Hartford. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Prest v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.
green
1 sentence1999Prest, 79 Wn. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Transamerica Insurance Group v. Chubb
green
2 sentences1992App. 247 , 554 P.2d 1080 (1976), review denied, 88 Wn.2d 1015 (1977), the court held that an insured establishes prejudice as a matter of law where he or she shows that the insurer controlled the defense for 10 months before issuing a reservation of rights. 1992App. 247 , 554 P.2d 1080 (1976), review denied, 88 Wn.2d 1015 (1977), the court held that an insured establishes prejudice as a matter of law where he or she shows that the insurer controlled the defense for 10 months before issuing a reservation of rights. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.
green
1 sentence1991App. 376, 380 , 613 P.2d 800 (1980) (exclusionary clauses are strictly construed against the insurer and if a clause can be construed in two ways, the construction favorable to the insured must be adopted), aff'd 95 Wn.2d 909 , 631 P.2d 947 (1981). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.
green
2 sentences1991App. 376, 380 , 613 P.2d 800 (1980) (exclusionary clauses are strictly construed against the insurer and if a clause can be construed in two ways, the construction favorable to the insured must be adopted), aff'd 95 Wn.2d 909 , 631 P.2d 947 (1981). 1991App. 376, 380 , 613 P.2d 800 (1980) (exclusionary clauses are strictly construed against the insurer and if a clause can be construed in two ways, the construction favorable to the insured must be adopted), aff'd 95 Wn.2d 909 , 631 P.2d 947 (1981). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Gould v. Mutual Life Insurance
green
1 sentence1987App. 756 , 683 P.2d 207 (1984) for the proposition that a third party beneficiary under an insurance policy can maintain an action against the insurer for violation of the CPA. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.