10 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hawkins v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2013The trial court is responsible for conducting “an oral inquiry of the defendant himself in open court, his replies to which indicate that he understands the nature of his right to a jury trial and that he chooses to waive that right.” Hawkins, 385 A.2d at 747 . 1985The trial court is responsible for conducting “an oral inquiry of the defendant himself in open court, his replies to which indicate that he understands the nature of his right to a jury trial and that he chooses to waive that right.” Hawkins, 385 A.2d at 747 . | 1 | 4 |
United States v. Ollie Baber, Jr.green1 sentence2013Therefore, just as appellants do not have a constitutional right to oral argument because “there are cases in which it is reasonably certain from the record and the briefs of the parties that no useful purpose would be served by devoting the court’s time and that of both prosecution and defense counsel to an oral hearing,” United States v. Baber, 447 F.2d 1267, 1271 (D.C.Cir.1971), appellants do not have a right to disposition by a formally calendared merits panel. | 1 | 1 |
Central Fidelity Bank v. McLellangreen1 sentence1990Mr. Nolan, in contrast, was permitted to file an opposition challenging the application, and his request for an oral hearing on his objections was granted by the court, which then made findings on each of his objections. “[Wjhere a contractual agreement expressly provides for the payment of attorney’s fees, the trial court’s discretion is limited to ascertaining what amount constitutes a ‘reasonable’ fee award.” Central Fidelity Bank v. McLellan, 563 A.2d 358, 360 (D.C.1989). | 1 | 1 |
Gray Panthers v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Servicesgreen2 sentences1982Although the question is unresolved as to whether an oral hearing is one of the “fundamental elements” of procedural due process, Gray Panthers v. Schweiker, - U.S.App.D.C. -, -, 652 F.2d 146, 163-165 (1981); Friendly, supra note 13, at 1281 & n.79, we conclude that under the Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test a police officer is entitled to an informal oral hearing 17 before his right to administrative sick leave is finally terminated. "[Wjritten submissions do not afford the flexibility of oral presentations; they do not permit the recipient to mold his argument to the issues the decision ma 1982The [oral] hearing requirement and many of the additional safeguards that due process may require in particular circumstances also serve as an institutional check on arbitrary or impermissible action .... ****** A third and perhaps most important reason for generally insisting upon an oral hearing requirement is that no other procedure so effectively fosters a belief that one has been dealt with fairly, even if there remains a disagreement with the result .... [Gray Panthers v. Schweiker, supra at 162.] To date, “the Supreme Court has ... not expressly upheld any process finally disposing [in | 1 | 1 |
Brumbaugh v. Gompersgreen1 sentence1981See Brumaugh v. Gompers, 50 U.S.App.D.C. 130 , 269 F. 472 (1920). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Banks v. United States
green
2 sentences2013“The trial judge must also assure that such waiver is contained in the record as it occurred....” Banks, 262 A.2d at 111 . 1992The appellate record, as in [Frederick] Jackson, contained an entry on the back of the information reading “Jury Trial Demand Withdrawn.” Although there was no evidence of an oral waiver in open court, this court affirmed Banks’ conviction upon the ground that “the discussion in open court at the first hearing about a jury trial for appellant and the official court entry on the information itself cured the absence from the transcript of any waiver.” Id. | 4 | 1985–2013 |
Gregory v. United States
neutral
1 sentence1992Less than a year after [Frederick] Jackson and Banks had sent out messages more readily reconcilable in result than in spirit, our court revisited the issue in Gregory v. United States, 271 A.2d 791 (D.C.1970) (per curiam). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Jackson v. United States
green
1 sentence1992Id. at 747 (emphasis in original). 7 Seven years after Hawkins came [Edward] Jackson v. United States, 498 A.2d 185 (D.C.1985). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
United States v. Reed
green
2 sentences1990Regarding the nature of proof of reasonableness of a fee, we observed in Central Fidelity that our prior decision in United States v. Reed, 31 A.2d 673 (D.C.1942), “imposes no absolute rule but rather states that if the court deems it necessary, or if either party desires, testimony may be taken as to the nature of services rendered or the reasonable value thereof.” Id. (emphasis added; internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 1990Regarding the nature of proof of reasonableness of a fee, we observed in Central Fidelity that our prior decision in United States v. Reed, 31 A.2d 673 (D.C.1942), “imposes no absolute rule but rather states that if the court deems it necessary, or if either party desires, testimony may be taken as to the nature of services rendered or the reasonable value thereof.” Id. (emphasis added; internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Dameron v. Capitol House Associates Ltd. Partnership
green
2 sentences1986Therefore, what began as a parallel, “equitable proceeding” effecting “no permanent disposition of property” pending resolution of the possessory action, Dameron, 431 A.2d at 584 , has become a money claim — an action at law — for withheld rent (or unliquidated damages), answered by a Javins defense seeking an abatement. 1986Therefore, what began as a parallel, "equitable proceeding" effecting "no permanent disposition of property" pending resolution of the possessory action, Dameron, 431 A.2d at 584 , has become a money claiman action at lawfor withheld rent (or unliquidated damages), answered by a Javins defense seeking an abatement. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Goss v. Lopez
green
2 sentences1982See Friendly, supra note 13, at 1287-88; Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 583 , 95 S.Ct. 729, 740 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); Wolff v. McDonnell, supra, 418 U.S. at 569-70 , 94 S.Ct. 2981 -82. 1982See Friendly, supra note 13, at 1287-88; Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 583 , 95 S.Ct. 729, 740 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); Wolff v. McDonnell, supra, 418 U.S. at 569-70 , 94 S.Ct. 2981 -82. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Goldberg v. Kelly
green
2 sentences1982Although the question is unresolved as to whether an oral hearing is one of the “fundamental elements” of procedural due process, Gray Panthers v. Schweiker, - U.S.App.D.C. -, -, 652 F.2d 146, 163-165 (1981); Friendly, supra note 13, at 1281 & n.79, we conclude that under the Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test a police officer is entitled to an informal oral hearing 17 before his right to administrative sick leave is finally terminated. "[Wjritten submissions do not afford the flexibility of oral presentations; they do not permit the recipient to mold his argument to the issues the decision ma 1982Although the question is unresolved as to whether an oral hearing is one of the “fundamental elements” of procedural due process, Gray Panthers v. Schweiker, - U.S.App.D.C. -, -, 652 F.2d 146, 163-165 (1981); Friendly, supra note 13, at 1281 & n.79, we conclude that under the Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test a police officer is entitled to an informal oral hearing 17 before his right to administrative sick leave is finally terminated. "[Wjritten submissions do not afford the flexibility of oral presentations; they do not permit the recipient to mold his argument to the issues the decision ma | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
1 sentence1982See Friendly, supra note 13, at 1287-88; Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 583 , 95 S.Ct. 729, 740 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); Wolff v. McDonnell, supra, 418 U.S. at 569-70 , 94 S.Ct. 2981 -82. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Hicks v. United States
green
1 sentence1978The government relies on two pre-Jackson cases, Hensley v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 155 A.2d 77 (1959), aff’d, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 242 , 281 F.2d 605 (1960), and Eliachar v. United States, D.C.App., 229 A.2d 451 (1967), and on a post -Jackson case, Hicks v. United States, D.C.App., 296 A.2d 615 (1972). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Edward H. Hensley v. United States
green
1 sentence1978The government relies on two pre-Jackson cases, Hensley v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 155 A.2d 77 (1959), aff’d, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 242 , 281 F.2d 605 (1960), and Eliachar v. United States, D.C.App., 229 A.2d 451 (1967), and on a post -Jackson case, Hicks v. United States, D.C.App., 296 A.2d 615 (1972). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Hensley v. United States
green
1 sentence1978The government relies on two pre-Jackson cases, Hensley v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 155 A.2d 77 (1959), aff’d, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 242 , 281 F.2d 605 (1960), and Eliachar v. United States, D.C.App., 229 A.2d 451 (1967), and on a post -Jackson case, Hicks v. United States, D.C.App., 296 A.2d 615 (1972). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Eliachar v. United States
green
1 sentence1978The government relies on two pre-Jackson cases, Hensley v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 155 A.2d 77 (1959), aff’d, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 242 , 281 F.2d 605 (1960), and Eliachar v. United States, D.C.App., 229 A.2d 451 (1967), and on a post -Jackson case, Hicks v. United States, D.C.App., 296 A.2d 615 (1972). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.