10 Nebraska opinions name it 1 courts 1930–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. Evansgreen2 sentences1962See, also, Anderson v. Evans, 164 Neb. 599 , 83 N. W. 2d 59 , in which it was held that an oral instruction to the jury out of the presence of the parties or their attorneys as to the manner of preparing a verdict, as to the intent of the court as to the content of a form of a verdict in blank supplied, and the effect of it with the blank or blanks filled out and returned by the jury was reversible error. 1962See, also, Anderson v. Evans, 164 Neb. 599 , 83 N. W. 2d 59 , in which it was held that an oral instruction to the jury out of the presence of the parties or their attorneys as to the manner of preparing a verdict, as to the intent of the court as to the content of a form of a verdict in blank supplied, and the effect of it with the blank or blanks filled out and returned by the jury was reversible error. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Kyron Murdock
green
2 sentences2018Thus, by voluntarily speaking with the investiga- tors, Hernandez impliedly waived his rights.46 42 U.S. v. Sturdivant, 796 F.3d 690 (7th Cir. 2015); U.S. v. Murdock, 491 F.3d 694 (7th Cir. 2007). 2018Thus, by voluntarily speaking with the investiga- tors, Hernandez impliedly waived his rights.46 42 U.S. v. Sturdivant, 796 F.3d 690 (7th Cir. 2015); U.S. v. Murdock, 491 F.3d 694 (7th Cir. 2007). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
United States v. Sturdivant
green
2 sentences2018Thus, by voluntarily speaking with the investiga- tors, Hernandez impliedly waived his rights.46 42 U.S. v. Sturdivant, 796 F.3d 690 (7th Cir. 2015); U.S. v. Murdock, 491 F.3d 694 (7th Cir. 2007). 2018Thus, by voluntarily speaking with the investiga- tors, Hernandez impliedly waived his rights.46 42 U.S. v. Sturdivant, 796 F.3d 690 (7th Cir. 2015); U.S. v. Murdock, 491 F.3d 694 (7th Cir. 2007). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
cluster 10870545
green
1 sentence2026Cite as 321 Neb. 515 determination becomes final at the expiration of the period.” 29 But if a petition for redetermination is timely filed, the Tax Commissioner must reconsider the determination and grant an oral hearing if the petition requested a hearing. 30 The Tax Commissioner’s decision upon a petition for redetermi- nation becomes final 30 days after the petitioner is served notice of the decision. 31 But “[a]ny final action of the Tax Commissioner may be appealed, and the appeal shall be in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act.” 32 The Tax Commissioner must notify the taxpa | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Wheeler v. Bagley
green
1 sentence1998This issue was recently addressed and resolved in Wheeler v. Bagley, ante p. 232, 575 N.W.2d 616 (1998). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Thostesen v. Doxsee
neutral
2 sentences1961They cite the case of Thostesen v. Doxsee, 77 Neb. 536 , 110 N. W. 319 . 1961They cite the case of Thostesen v. Doxsee, 77 Neb. 536 , 110 N. W. 319 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Crecelius ex rel. Crecelius v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.
green
1 sentence1959R. 5, wherein the court held: “The giving of 'an oral instruction. to the jury in regard to the principles'of law applicable to the case and to the evidence, without a waiver *389 of the statutory requirement that it be. in writing, is reversible error.” ; i We are in accord with, the statement made .in'Crecelius v.' Gamble-Skogmp, Inc., 144 Neb. 394 , 13 N, W. 2d 627, that communications. ■ between the trial judge and the jury after retirement of the jury should be controlled by a high degree, of circumspection. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Carter v. Zdan
neutral
2 sentences1958Appellant suggests that since appellee did not raise the question involved and did not assign and discuss it in his brief that it has been waived under our holding in Carter v. Zdan, 151 Neb. 185 , 36 N. W. 2d 781 , to the effect that assignments of error not discussed will not be considered. 1958Appellant suggests that since appellee did not raise the question involved and did not assign and discuss it in his brief that it has been waived under our holding in Carter v. Zdan, 151 Neb. 185 , 36 N. W. 2d 781 , to the effect that assignments of error not discussed will not be considered. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Hartwig v. Gordon
neutral
1 sentence1930Hartwig v. Gordon, 37 Neb. 657 ; Ehrlich v. State, 44 Neb. 810 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Ehrlich v. State
neutral
1 sentence1930Hartwig v. Gordon, 37 Neb. 657 ; Ehrlich v. State, 44 Neb. 810 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Pierce v. Lincoln Traction Co.
neutral
1 sentence1930Pierce v. Lincoln Traction Co., 92 Neb. 797 ; Andersen v. Omaha & C. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.