9 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1908–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cunningham v. Bechtoldgreen2 sentences2022See Cunningham, 186 W. 2018Va. 553 , 363 S.E.2d 238 (1987). 27 The 2010 version of West Virginia Code § 17C-5-7 applies to this case and provides, in relevant part: (a) If any person under arrest as specified in section four of this article refuses to submit to any secondary chemical test, the tests shall not be given: Provided, That prior to the refusal, the person is given an oral warning and a written statement advising him or her that his or her refusal to submit to the secondary test finally designated will result in the revocation of his or her license to operate a motor vehicle in this state for a period of at le | 1 | 2 |
Leftwich v. Wesco Corporationgreen1 sentence1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). | 1 | 1 |
Leftwich v. Wesco Corp.green1 sentence1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Patkogreen1 sentence1948See State v. Patko, 97 W. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Murphy
neutral
2 sentences1948State v. Murphy, 93 W. 1947State v. Murphy, 93 W. | 2 | 1947–1948 |
Moczek v. Bechtold
green
1 sentence2018Va. 553 , 363 S.E.2d 238 (1987). 27 The 2010 version of West Virginia Code § 17C-5-7 applies to this case and provides, in relevant part: (a) If any person under arrest as specified in section four of this article refuses to submit to any secondary chemical test, the tests shall not be given: Provided, That prior to the refusal, the person is given an oral warning and a written statement advising him or her that his or her refusal to submit to the secondary test finally designated will result in the revocation of his or her license to operate a motor vehicle in this state for a period of at le | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Landers v. Ohio River R.
neutral
2 sentences1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). 1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
green
2 sentences1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). 1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co.
green
2 sentences1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). 1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Burk v. Huntington Development & Gas Co.
green
2 sentences1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). 1980See, Leftwich v. Wesco Corporation, 146 W.Va. 196 , 119 S.E.2d 401 (1961); Burk v. Huntington Development and Gas Co., 133 W.Va. 817 , 58 S.E.2d 574 (1950); Gilkerson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 132 W.Va. 133 , 51 S.E.2d 767 (1949); Roberts v. United Fuel Gas Co., 84 W.Va. 368 , 99 S.E. 549 (1919); Landers v. Ohio River Railroad, 46 W.Va. 492 , 33 S.E. 296 (1899). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Monto v. Gillooly
red
1 sentence1949In Monto v. Gillooly, 107 W. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Charleston Lumber Co. v. Friedman
green
1 sentence1949Va. 151, 160 , 61 S. E. 815 , this Court said, speaking through Judge Brannon, “An oral waiver of a contract ‘must be clear, positive and above suspicion, and cannot be proven by mere loose, casual conversation’ ”. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
State Ex Rel. Pierce v. Williams
neutral
1 sentence1948Va. 218 , 120 S. E. 594 , that where the parties united in asking the court to give an oral instruction, which was given without objection, neither party could complain, because the instruction was not in writing. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Henderson v. Kessel
green
1 sentence1926Henderson v. Kessel, 93 W. | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Cunningham v. Cunningham
neutral
1 sentence1908An oral waiver of a contract “must be clear, positive and above suspicion, and cannot be proven by mere loose casual conversation. ” Cunningham v. Cunningham, 46 W. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
State v. Bowyer
neutral
1 sentence1908As said in Bowyers' Case, 43 W. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.