10 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cohen v. Battagliagreen2 sentences2022See Cohen v. Battaglia, 296 Kan. 542, 545-46 , 293 P.3d 752 (2013); see also K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 60- 212. 2022See Cohen v. Battaglia, 296 Kan. 542, 545-46 , 293 P.3d 752 (2013); see also K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 60- 212. | 2 | 2 |
James v. Quinlangreen1 sentence2004See James v. Quinlan, 866 F.2d 627, 629 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 493 U.S. 870 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Lamberti v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2004See James v. Quinlan, 866 F.2d 627, 629 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 493 U.S. 870 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Darnell v. Simmonsgreen1 sentence2003Ed. 2d 251 , 97 S. Ct. 285 (1976); see Darnell v. Simmons, 30 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
Sherwood v. Mulvihillgreen1 sentence2001See Sherwood v. Mulvihill, 113 F.3d 396, 399 (3rd Cir. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Estelle v. Gamble
green
2 sentences2003Deliberate indifference to an inmate’s medical needs by prison officials violates the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, but, “[i]n order to state a cognizable claim, a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 103-06 , 50 L. 2003Deliberate indifference to an inmate’s medical needs by prison officials violates the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, but, “[i]n order to state a cognizable claim, a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 103-06 , 50 L. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Gillespie v. Seymour
green
2 sentences1995Gillespie v. Seymour, 250 Kan. 123, 129 , 823 P.2d 782 (1991). 1995Gillespie v. Seymour, 250 Kan. 123, 129 , 823 P.2d 782 (1991). | 2 | 1995–1995 |
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Sebelius
green
1 sentence2024Morrison, 285 Kan. at 891 - 92. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Goins v. Ford Motor Co.
green
2 sentences2004In Goins v. Ford Motor Co., 131 Mich. App. 185 , 347 N.W.2d 184 (1984), the Michigan Court of Appeals held that Goins stated a cognizable claim against Ford, his current employer, for retalia-toiy discharge because he filed a workers compensation claim against his former employer, General Motors. 2004In Goins v. Ford Motor Co., 131 Mich. App. 185 , 347 N.W.2d 184 (1984), the Michigan Court of Appeals held that Goins stated a cognizable claim against Ford, his current employer, for retalia-toiy discharge because he filed a workers compensation claim against his former employer, General Motors. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.