Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mumm v. Mornsongreen2 sentences2026“A cognizable claim of a Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process violation must describe governmental conduct so egregious that it ‘shocks the conscience.’” Mumm v. Mornson, 708 N.W.2d 475, 487 (Minn. 2006) (citing Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 172-74 (1952)). 5 Breitkreutz makes no argument, and our review of the record reveals no evidence, of egregious conduct or arbitrary decision-making by the county. 2009A cognizable claim under this standard must describe “egregious” governmental conduct, and we have said that “[o]nly the most extreme instances of governmental misconduct satisfy this exacting standard.” Mumm v. Mornson, 708 N.W.2d 475, 487, 490 (Minn.2006) (holding that an officer’s use of deadly force to stop a dangerous car chase did not shock the conscience because “[a]n officer’s poor judgment in using unreasonable force does not automatically convert the officer’s acts into conscience shocking conduct”). | 2 | 2 |
Rochin v. Californiagreen2 sentences2026“A cognizable claim of a Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process violation must describe governmental conduct so egregious that it ‘shocks the conscience.’” Mumm v. Mornson, 708 N.W.2d 475, 487 (Minn. 2006) (citing Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 172-74 (1952)). 5 Breitkreutz makes no argument, and our review of the record reveals no evidence, of egregious conduct or arbitrary decision-making by the county. 2006A cognizable claim of a Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process violation must describe governmental conduct so egregious that it "shocks the conscience." Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 172-74 , 72 S.Ct. 205 , 96 L.Ed. 183 (1952). | 1 | 2 |
Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzkegreen1 sentence2017Charson, 419 N.W.2d at 491-92 . “[A] debatably meritorious claim is one that, if established at trial, presents a cognizable claim for relief.” Cole v. Wutzke, 884 N.W.2d 634, 638 (Minn. 2016). | 1 | 1 |
Finden v. Klaasgreen1 sentence2016See Finden, 268 Minn, at 271, 128 N.W.2d at 750 (explaining that self-defense is a “reasonable defense” because, “if it is established,” it is a complete defense on the merits). | 1 | 1 |
Becker v. Mayo Foundationgreen1 sentence2012“A statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action unless the language of the statute is explicit or it can be determined by clear implication.” Becker v. Mayo Found., 737 N.W.2d 200, 207 (Minn.2007). | 1 | 1 |
Sun Oil Company v. Village of New Hopegreen2 sentences2005Hay v. City of Andover, 436 N.W.2d 800, 805 (Minn.App.1989) (reviewing challenge to comprehensive plan decision); cf. Sun Oil Co. v. Village of New Hope, 300 Minn. 326, 334-35 , 220 N.W.2d 256, 261 (Minn.1974) (reasoning that, where a city’s refusal to rezone was based on a comprehensive zoning ordinance, it was proper to attack the comprehensive ordinance as arbitrary and capricious). 2005Hay v. City of Andover, 436 N.W.2d 800, 805 (Minn.App.1989) (reviewing challenge to comprehensive plan decision); cf. Sun Oil Co. v. Village of New Hope, 300 Minn. 326, 334-35 , 220 N.W.2d 256, 261 (Minn.1974) (reasoning that, where a city’s refusal to rezone was based on a comprehensive zoning ordinance, it was proper to attack the comprehensive ordinance as arbitrary and capricious). | 1 | 1 |
Hay v. City of Andovergreen1 sentence2005Hay v. City of Andover, 436 N.W.2d 800, 805 (Minn.App.1989) (reviewing challenge to comprehensive plan decision); cf. Sun Oil Co. v. Village of New Hope, 300 Minn. 326, 334-35 , 220 N.W.2d 256, 261 (Minn.1974) (reasoning that, where a city’s refusal to rezone was based on a comprehensive zoning ordinance, it was proper to attack the comprehensive ordinance as arbitrary and capricious). | 1 | 1 |
State of Missouri Ex Rel. Minnie E. T. Gore, Jennye Robinson v. R. Dean Wochner, M.D.green1 sentence1988Gore v. Wochner, 620 F.2d 183, 185 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 875 , 101 S.Ct. 218 , 66 L.Ed.2d 96 (1980)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Charson v. Temple Israel
green
2 sentences2017Charson, 419 N.W.2d at 491-92 . “[A] debatably meritorious claim is one that, if established at trial, presents a cognizable claim for relief.” Cole v. Wutzke, 884 N.W.2d 634, 638 (Minn. 2016). 2017Ordinarily, a claim must be established by more than “conclusory allegations in moving papers.” Charson, 419 N.W.2d at 491 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
L.K. v. Gregg
neutral
1 sentence1988The court below did not directly apply this standard, but correctly stated: “In order * * * to bring a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , a specific and articulable constitutional right must have been transgressed and a cognizable claim for relief must be stated on the face of the pleading.” Gregg II, 413 N.W.2d at 836 -37 (quoting Missouri ex rel. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Miles
green
1 sentence1988Gore v. Wochner, 620 F.2d 183, 185 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 875 , 101 S.Ct. 218 , 66 L.Ed.2d 96 (1980)). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Gore v. Wochner
green
1 sentence1988Gore v. Wochner, 620 F.2d 183, 185 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 875 , 101 S.Ct. 218 , 66 L.Ed.2d 96 (1980)). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Detweiler v. Detweiler
green
1 sentence1988Gore v. Wochner, 620 F.2d 183, 185 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 875 , 101 S.Ct. 218 , 66 L.Ed.2d 96 (1980)). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.