Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
31 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2026 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nashgreen2 sentences2021See Nash, 212 N.J. at 542 ("Mere dissatisfaction with a 'counsel's exercise of judgment' is insufficient to warrant overturning a conviction."); State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 54 (1987) ("complaints 'merely of matters of trial strategy' will not serve to ground a constitutional claim of inadequacy"). 2021See Nash, 212 N.J. at 542 ("Mere dissatisfaction with a 'counsel's exercise of judgment' is insufficient to warrant overturning a conviction."); State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 54 (1987) ("complaints 'merely of matters of trial strategy' will not serve to ground a constitutional claim of inadequacy"). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Fritzgreen2 sentences2021See Nash, 212 N.J. at 542 ("Mere dissatisfaction with a 'counsel's exercise of judgment' is insufficient to warrant overturning a conviction."); State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 54 (1987) ("complaints 'merely of matters of trial strategy' will not serve to ground a constitutional claim of inadequacy"). 2021See Nash, 212 N.J. at 542 ("Mere dissatisfaction with a 'counsel's exercise of judgment' is insufficient to warrant overturning a conviction."); State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 54 (1987) ("complaints 'merely of matters of trial strategy' will not serve to ground a constitutional claim of inadequacy"). | 2 | 2 |
Hancock v. Borough of Oaklyngreen2 sentences2020See Hancock v. Borough of Oaklyn, 347 N.J. 2020See Hancock v. Borough of Oaklyn, 347 N.J. | 2 | 2 |
Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. Myersgreen2 sentences2020See Karins, 152 N.J. at 561-62 (stating that "[i]n a disciplinary case such as this one, it is not necessary 'for an employer to allow events to unfold to the extent that the A-5006-17T3 8 disruption of the office and the destruction of working relationships is manifest before taking action'") (quoting Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 152 (1983)). 2020See Karins, 152 N.J. at 561-62 (stating that "[i]n a disciplinary case such as this one, it is not necessary 'for an employer to allow events to unfold to the extent that the A-5006-17T3 8 disruption of the office and the destruction of working relationships is manifest before taking action'") (quoting Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 152 (1983)). | 2 | 2 |
Karins v. City of Atlantic Citygreen2 sentences2020See Karins, 152 N.J. at 561-62 (stating that "[i]n a disciplinary case such as this one, it is not necessary 'for an employer to allow events to unfold to the extent that the A-5006-17T3 8 disruption of the office and the destruction of working relationships is manifest before taking action'") (quoting Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 152 (1983)). 2020See Karins, 152 N.J. at 561-62 (stating that "[i]n a disciplinary case such as this one, it is not necessary 'for an employer to allow events to unfold to the extent that the A-5006-17T3 8 disruption of the office and the destruction of working relationships is manifest before taking action'") (quoting Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 152 (1983)). | 2 | 2 |
Trisuzzi v. Tabatchnikgreen2 sentences1998Id. at 35 , 692 A.2d 61 (citing Trisuzzi v. Tabatchnik, 285 N.J.Super. 15, 26 , 666 A.2d 543 (App.Div.1995)). 1998Id. at 35 , 692 A.2d 61 (citing Trisuzzi v. Tabatchnik, 285 N.J.Super. 15, 26 , 666 A.2d 543 (App.Div.1995)). | 1 | 2 |
State of New Jersey v. Alice O'Donnellgreen1 sentence2026Id. at 624 (quoting State v. O'Donnell, 435 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Chambersgreen1 sentence2024See State v. Chambers, 377 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Murraygreen1 sentence2024Applying the definition of an illegal sentence as set forth in State v. Murray, 162 N.J. 240, 246-47 (2000), Judge Romanyshyn found defendant did not state a cognizable claim under Rule 3:21-10(b)(5). | 1 | 1 |
Russo v. Nagelgreen1 sentence2024See Russo v. Nagel, 358 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2023With respect to the remaining claims, to establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must satisfy the two-part Strickland test: (1) "counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the 'counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment[,]" and (2) "the deficient performance prejudiced the defense." Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) (quoting U.S. Const. amend. | 1 | 1 |
Morgan v. Union Countygreen1 sentence2022Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 268 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Mattero v. Silvermangreen1 sentence2022In the usual case, violation of a statute is only evidence of negligence, and only if the statutory violation was "causally 8 In finding plaintiff had sufficiently pled a cognizable claim for negligence per se, the judge wrote: The violation of a statute or regulation 'may be considered by a jury together with all of the evidence in determining issues of negligence[,]' and this proposition is 'subsumed by the overriding principle that the . . . statutory violation, to be evidential, must be causally related to the happening of the accident[.]' Mattero v. Silverman, 71 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Banco Popular North America v. Gandigreen1 sentence2022However, "indulgently A-2896-20 9 read," Green, 215 N.J. at 460 , we cannot ignore the fact that despite its numerous references to Directive violations, ultimately, the complaint alleged defendants had participated in a civil conspiracy, a cognizable claim in New Jersey. [A] civil conspiracy is "a combination of two or more persons acting in concert to commit an unlawful act, or to commit a lawful act by unlawful means, the principal element of which is an agreement between the parties to inflict a wrong against or injury upon another, and an overt act that results in damage." [Banco Popular | 1 | 1 |
Polzo v. County of Essexgreen1 sentence2021The elements of a cause of action for negligence are "(1) a duty of care, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) proximate cause, and (4) actual damages." Townsend v. Pierre, 221 N.J. 36, 51 (2015) (quoting Polzo v. Cnty. of Essex, 196 N.J. 569, 584 (2008)). | 1 | 1 |
Delbridge v. Off. of Pub. Def.green1 sentence2021Delbridge v. Office of the Public Defender, 238 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Deborah Townsend v. Noah Pierre (072357)green1 sentence2021The elements of a cause of action for negligence are "(1) a duty of care, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) proximate cause, and (4) actual damages." Townsend v. Pierre, 221 N.J. 36, 51 (2015) (quoting Polzo v. Cnty. of Essex, 196 N.J. 569, 584 (2008)). | 1 | 1 |
McLelland v. Mooregreen2 sentences2013See McLelland, supra, 343 N.J.Super. at 600 , 779 A.2d 463 ; Mehlman, supra, 153 N.J. at 193 , 707 A.2d 1000 ; Klein, supra, 377 N.J.Super. at 40 , 871 A.2d 681 . 2013See McLelland, supra, 343 N.J.Super. at 600 , 779 A.2d 463 ; Mehlman, supra, 153 N.J. at 193 , 707 A.2d 1000 ; Klein, supra, 377 N.J.Super. at 40 , 871 A.2d 681 . | 1 | 1 |
| Wilson v. Seitergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Estelle v. Gamblegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Brewster
green
2 sentences2026Id. at 624 (quoting State v. O'Donnell, 435 N.J. 2025Id., 474 N.J. | 2 | 2025–2026 |
In Re Lead Paint Litigation
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 409 , 924 A.2d 484 . 2010Id. at 409 , 924 A.2d 484 . | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Green v. Morgan Properties
green
1 sentence2022However, "indulgently A-2896-20 9 read," Green, 215 N.J. at 460 , we cannot ignore the fact that despite its numerous references to Directive violations, ultimately, the complaint alleged defendants had participated in a civil conspiracy, a cognizable claim in New Jersey. [A] civil conspiracy is "a combination of two or more persons acting in concert to commit an unlawful act, or to commit a lawful act by unlawful means, the principal element of which is an agreement between the parties to inflict a wrong against or injury upon another, and an overt act that results in damage." [Banco Popular | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Mattero v. Silverman
neutral
1 sentence2022Super. 1, 9 (App. Div. 1961), certif. denied, 36 N.J. 305 (1962). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Acevedo
green
1 sentence2020Our Supreme Court reiterated that "allegations of improper consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors and consecutive sentencing guidelines [are] not cognizable claims on [PCR]." Acevedo, 205 N.J. at 47 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. DiFrisco
green
1 sentence2020The cognizable claim is not that the expert may have provided "substandard services[,]" but rather "the deficient performance that implicates a defendant's right . . . is the performance of counsel who obtained the expert's examinations or presented the evidence at trial." Ibid. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Tedards v. Auty
green
1 sentence2017Defendants used their "lies and lack of candor to get the [c]ourt to approve approximately $112,000.00 in funds 4 A-1493-14T3 from [p]laintiff to pay for Anna[] [Olynyk's] litigation." From these facts, Judge Ramsay found plaintiff had not made out a cognizable claim of abuse of process, as that common law tort is defined and discussed by this court in Tedards v. Auty, 232 N.J. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In re Schwartz
green
1 sentence2014In D’Agostino, supra, the Court held that a foreclosure rescue scheme that was advertised to the public and involved the payment of a fee gave rise to a cognizable claim under the CFA. 216 *224 N.J. at 186-88, 78 A.3d 527 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Klein v. UMDNJ
green
2 sentences2013See McLelland, supra, 343 N.J.Super. at 600 , 779 A.2d 463 ; Mehlman, supra, 153 N.J. at 193 , 707 A.2d 1000 ; Klein, supra, 377 N.J.Super. at 40 , 871 A.2d 681 . 2013See McLelland, supra, 343 N.J.Super. at 600 , 779 A.2d 463 ; Mehlman, supra, 153 N.J. at 193 , 707 A.2d 1000 ; Klein, supra, 377 N.J.Super. at 40 , 871 A.2d 681 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp.
green
2 sentences2013See McLelland, supra, 343 N.J.Super. at 600 , 779 A.2d 463 ; Mehlman, supra, 153 N.J. at 193 , 707 A.2d 1000 ; Klein, supra, 377 N.J.Super. at 40 , 871 A.2d 681 . 2013See McLelland, supra, 343 N.J.Super. at 600 , 779 A.2d 463 ; Mehlman, supra, 153 N.J. at 193 , 707 A.2d 1000 ; Klein, supra, 377 N.J.Super. at 40 , 871 A.2d 681 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008In framing the issue, the trial court reviewed the standards governing pleadings and motions to dismiss, as well as the facts and holdings of several significant cases that addressed medical monitoring: Ayers v. Township of Jackson, 106 N.J. 557 , 525 A. 2d 287 (1987), Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 116 N.J. 126 , 561 A. 2d 257 (1989), and Theer v. Philip Carey Co., 133 N.J. 610 , 628 A. 2d 724 (1993). 2008In framing the issue, the trial court reviewed the standards governing pleadings and motions to dismiss, as well as the facts and holdings of several significant cases that addressed medical monitoring: Ayers v. Township of Jackson, 106 N.J. 557 , 525 A. 2d 287 (1987), Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 116 N.J. 126 , 561 A. 2d 257 (1989), and Theer v. Philip Carey Co., 133 N.J. 610 , 628 A. 2d 724 (1993). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Theer v. Philip Carey Co.
green
2 sentences2008In framing the issue, the trial court reviewed the standards governing pleadings and motions to dismiss, as well as the facts and holdings of several significant cases that addressed medical monitoring: Ayers v. Township of Jackson, 106 N.J. 557 , 525 A. 2d 287 (1987), Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 116 N.J. 126 , 561 A. 2d 257 (1989), and Theer v. Philip Carey Co., 133 N.J. 610 , 628 A. 2d 724 (1993). 2008In framing the issue, the trial court reviewed the standards governing pleadings and motions to dismiss, as well as the facts and holdings of several significant cases that addressed medical monitoring: Ayers v. Township of Jackson, 106 N.J. 557 , 525 A. 2d 287 (1987), Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 116 N.J. 126 , 561 A. 2d 257 (1989), and Theer v. Philip Carey Co., 133 N.J. 610 , 628 A. 2d 724 (1993). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| Ayers v. Township of Jackson green | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| Triffin v. Cigna Insurance neutral | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Triffin v. Somerset Valley Bank green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| O'CONNOR v. Abraham Altus green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Lingar v. Live-In Companions, Inc. green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Rieder v. State, Dept. of Transp. green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Gleitman v. Cosgrove green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Portee v. Jaffee green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.