Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Myers v. BOARD OF JACKSON COUNTY COMM'RSgreen2 sentences2006In Myers v. Board of Jackson County Comm'rs, 280 Kan. 869, 876-77 , 127 P.3d 319 (2006), the Kansas Supreme Court cited Gessner in holding “[fjailure to provide the statutory notice of a claim in accordance with . . . 12-105b precludes relief.” The Supreme Court further stated ”[i]f the statutory requirements are not met, the court cannot acquire jurisdiction over the municipality.” 280 Kan. at 877. 2006In Myers v. Board of Jackson County Comm'rs, 280 Kan. 869, 876-77 , 127 P.3d 319 (2006), the Kansas Supreme Court cited Gessner in holding “[fjailure to provide the statutory notice of a claim in accordance with . . . 12-105b precludes relief.” The Supreme Court further stated ”[i]f the statutory requirements are not met, the court cannot acquire jurisdiction over the municipality.” 280 Kan. at 877. | 1 | 1 |
Bradford v. Mahangreen2 sentences1999See Bradford v. Mahan, 219 Kan. 450, 457 , 548 P.2d 1223 (1976); Tucking v. Board of Jefferson County Comm’rs, 14 Kan. 1999See Bradford v. Mahan, 219 Kan. 450, 457 , 548 P.2d 1223 (1976); Tucking v. Board of Jefferson County Comm’rs, 14 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of Commissioners
neutral
2 sentences2022"The purpose of the statutory notice requirement is to sufficiently advise the proper municipality of the time and place of the injury and give the municipality an opportunity to ascertain the character and extent of the injury sustained." Southwestern Bell, 41 Kan. 2010Co. v. Board of Lyon County Comm’rs, 41 Kan. | 3 | 2010–2022 |
Gessner v. Phillips County Commissioners
green
2 sentences2006Gessner, 270 Kan. at 82 . 2006Gessner, 270 Kan. at 82 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Kau Kau Take Home No. 1 v. City of Wichita
green
2 sentences2009Kau Kau Take Home No. 1 v. City of Wichita, 281 Kan. 1185 , Syl. ¶ 2, 135 P.3d 1221 (2006). 2009Kau Kau Take Home No. 1 v. City of Wichita, 281 Kan. 1185 , Syl. ¶ 2, 135 P.3d 1221 (2006). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Bell v. Kansas City, Kansas, Housing Authority
green
2 sentences2009Bell v. Kansas City, Kansas, Housing Authority, 268 Kan. 208, 210 , 992 P.2d 1233 (1999). 2009Bell v. Kansas City, Kansas, Housing Authority, 268 Kan. 208, 210 , 992 P.2d 1233 (1999). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Myers v. Board of County Commissioners
green
1 sentence2006In Myers v. Board of Jackson County Comm'rs, 280 Kan. 869, 876-77 , 127 P.3d 319 (2006), the Kansas Supreme Court cited Gessner in holding “[fjailure to provide the statutory notice of a claim in accordance with . . . 12-105b precludes relief.” The Supreme Court further stated ”[i]f the statutory requirements are not met, the court cannot acquire jurisdiction over the municipality.” 280 Kan. at 877. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Meigs v. Kansas Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences1994Nevertheless, defendant argues an inaccurate written notice cannot per se substantially comply with the statutory notice requirement, citing Meigs v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 251 Kan. 677 , 840 P.2d 448 (1992). 1994Nevertheless, defendant argues an inaccurate written notice cannot per se substantially comply with the statutory notice requirement, citing Meigs v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 251 Kan. 677 , 840 P.2d 448 (1992). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.