Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shinkle v. Shinklegreen2 sentences2006See Shinkle v Shinkle, 255 Mich App 221, 228 ; 663 NW2d 481 (2003). 4 Michigan has long recognized the validity of property agreements entered into at the time of separation. 2006See Shinkle v Shinkle, 255 Mich App 221, 228 ; 663 NW2d 481 (2003). 4 Michigan has long recognized the validity of property agreements entered into at the time of separation. | 1 | 1 |
Stoner v. Californiagreen2 sentences1970He is a third party or an outsider when considering the crime charged. *527 Justice, logic, and an understanding of the obvious purpose of the constitutional protection requires this Court to adopt the rule stated in Stoner v. California (1964), 376 US 483, 489 ( 84 S Ct 889, 893 , 11 L Ed 2d 856, 860 ): “It is important to bear in mind that it was the petitioner’s constitutional right which was at stake here, and not the night clerk’s nor the hotel’s. 1970He is a third party or an outsider when considering the crime charged. *527 Justice, logic, and an understanding of the obvious purpose of the constitutional protection requires this Court to adopt the rule stated in Stoner v. California (1964), 376 US 483, 489 ( 84 S Ct 889, 893 , 11 L Ed 2d 856, 860 ): “It is important to bear in mind that it was the petitioner’s constitutional right which was at stake here, and not the night clerk’s nor the hotel’s. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 790797
green
2 sentences2024Assuming we do not agree with defendant’s claim of entitlement to a full resentencing – which would arguably give somewhat of a windfall to all defendants whose sentencing judges are no longer available – defendant alternatively urges this Court to adopt the analysis set forth in United States v Garcia, 413 F3d 201 (CA 2, 2005). 2018Assuming we do not agree with defendant's claim of entitlement to a full resentencing-which would arguably give somewhat of a windfall to all defendants whose sentencing judges are no longer available-defendant alternatively urges this Court to adopt the analysis set forth in United States v. Garcia , 413 F.3d 201 (C.A. 2, 2005). | 3 | 2018–2024 |
Szkodzinski v. Griffin
green
2 sentences1993Id. 1993Id. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Bush v. Oscoda Area Schools
green
2 sentences1983The more recent cases construe the consensus in Bush v Oscoda Area Schools, 405 Mich 716 ; 275 NW2d 268 (1979), and Lockaby v Wayne County, 406 Mich 65 ; 276 NW2d 1 (1979), as having held that the proper test to apply to ascertain individual immunity of an employee of a governmental agency, engaged in the exercise or discharge of a governmental function, is merely whether this individual employee was acting within the scope of his employment. 1983The more recent cases construe the consensus in Bush v Oscoda Area Schools, 405 Mich 716 ; 275 NW2d 268 (1979), and Lockaby v Wayne County, 406 Mich 65 ; 276 NW2d 1 (1979), as having held that the proper test to apply to ascertain individual immunity of an employee of a governmental agency, engaged in the exercise or discharge of a governmental function, is merely whether this individual employee was acting within the scope of his employment. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Lockaby v. Wayne County
green
2 sentences1983The more recent cases construe the consensus in Bush v Oscoda Area Schools, 405 Mich 716 ; 275 NW2d 268 (1979), and Lockaby v Wayne County, 406 Mich 65 ; 276 NW2d 1 (1979), as having held that the proper test to apply to ascertain individual immunity of an employee of a governmental agency, engaged in the exercise or discharge of a governmental function, is merely whether this individual employee was acting within the scope of his employment. 1983The more recent cases construe the consensus in Bush v Oscoda Area Schools, 405 Mich 716 ; 275 NW2d 268 (1979), and Lockaby v Wayne County, 406 Mich 65 ; 276 NW2d 1 (1979), as having held that the proper test to apply to ascertain individual immunity of an employee of a governmental agency, engaged in the exercise or discharge of a governmental function, is merely whether this individual employee was acting within the scope of his employment. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Lewis v. Beecher School System
green
2 sentences1983However, we perceive an emerging trend among the members of this Court to adopt the analysis of Judge Bashara’s dissenting and concurring opinion in Cook v *210 Bennett, supra, as further explained by Judge Bronson’s majority opinion in Gaston, supra. See Lewis v Beecher School System, 118 Mich App 105 ; 324 NW2d 779 (1982). 1983However, we perceive an emerging trend among the members of this Court to adopt the analysis of Judge Bashara’s dissenting and concurring opinion in Cook v *210 Bennett, supra, as further explained by Judge Bronson’s majority opinion in Gaston, supra. See Lewis v Beecher School System, 118 Mich App 105 ; 324 NW2d 779 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Gaston v. Becker
green
1 sentence1983However, we perceive an emerging trend among the members of this Court to adopt the analysis of Judge Bashara’s dissenting and concurring opinion in Cook v *210 Bennett, supra, as further explained by Judge Bronson’s majority opinion in Gaston, supra. See Lewis v Beecher School System, 118 Mich App 105 ; 324 NW2d 779 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Cook v. Bennett
green
1 sentence1983However, we perceive an emerging trend among the members of this Court to adopt the analysis of Judge Bashara’s dissenting and concurring opinion in Cook v *210 Bennett, supra, as further explained by Judge Bronson’s majority opinion in Gaston, supra. See Lewis v Beecher School System, 118 Mich App 105 ; 324 NW2d 779 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Christie v. BD. OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY REGENTS
green
2 sentences1978Plaintiffs cite Christie v Board of Regents of University of Michigan, 364 Mich 202 ; 111 NW2d 30 (1961), in which Justice Black wrote that the purchase of a liability insurance policy by a governmental agency should constitute a waiver of immunity to the extent of the insurance coverage. 1978Plaintiffs cite Christie v Board of Regents of University of Michigan, 364 Mich 202 ; 111 NW2d 30 (1961), in which Justice Black wrote that the purchase of a liability insurance policy by a governmental agency should constitute a waiver of immunity to the extent of the insurance coverage. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.
red
2 sentences1975Defendant has urged the Court to adopt the rule of "relative fault”, set forth in Dole v Dow Chemical Co, 30 NY2d 143 ; 331 NYS2d 382 ; 282 NE2d 288 ; 53 ALR3d 175 (1972). 1975Defendant has urged the Court to adopt the rule of "relative fault”, set forth in Dole v Dow Chemical Co, 30 NY2d 143 ; 331 NYS2d 382 ; 282 NE2d 288 ; 53 ALR3d 175 (1972). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees
green
1 sentence1966Plain *345 tiff in her brief quotes the language of the California court in the case of Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees (1957), 154 Cal App 2d 560 ( 317 P2d 170 ), wherein the court said (p 568): “The application of the doctrine of the res ipsa loquitur in malpractice cases is a development of comparatively recent years. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.