Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Guevara v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.green2 sentences2010Butt Grocery Co. , 82 S.W.3d 550, 552-53 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2002, pet. denied) ("Guevara urges this Court to adopt the doctrine of equitable tolling . . . [citing Zipes ]. 2010Butt Grocery Co., 82 S.W.3d 550, 552-53 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, pet. denied) (“Guevara urges this Court to adopt the doctrine of equitable tolling ... [citing Zipes ]. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Renteriagreen1 sentence2015See (AB – 22-23). 13 In support of his proposition, appellant relies on State v. Renteria, 977 S.W.2d 606 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
McKnight v. Trogdon-McKnightgreen1 sentence2009McKnight v. Trogdon-McKnight , 132 S.W.3d 126, 131 (Tex.App.–Houston [14 th Dist.] 2004, no pet.). 6: It has long been the rule under the common law that a devise of land is specific whether given by specific description or residuary clause. 293 S.W. at 269 ; 299 S.W. at 893 . 7: Dan proposes that this Court adopt a rule that residuary clauses encompass only property that is described in detail in the divorce decree itself. | 1 | 1 |
Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smithred2 sentences2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. 2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Scott v. Cannon
green
1 sentence2015Id. at pp. 42-47 (citing Scott v. Cannon, 959 S.W.2d 712 (Tex.App.─Austin 1998, pet. denied), and Montange v. Hagelstein, No. 10-05-00291-CV, 2006 WL 648115 (Tex.App.─Waco 2006, pet. denied) (mem. op.). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
green
1 sentence2014The selective waiver doctrine originated in Diversified Industries, Inc. v. Meredith, *850 572 F.2d 596 (8th Cir.1977). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Russell v. Adams
green
1 sentence2009McKnight v. Trogdon-McKnight , 132 S.W.3d 126, 131 (Tex.App.–Houston [14 th Dist.] 2004, no pet.). 6: It has long been the rule under the common law that a devise of land is specific whether given by specific description or residuary clause. 293 S.W. at 269 ; 299 S.W. at 893 . 7: Dan proposes that this Court adopt a rule that residuary clauses encompass only property that is described in detail in the divorce decree itself. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Russell v. Adams
green
1 sentence2009McKnight v. Trogdon-McKnight , 132 S.W.3d 126, 131 (Tex.App.–Houston [14 th Dist.] 2004, no pet.). 6: It has long been the rule under the common law that a devise of land is specific whether given by specific description or residuary clause. 293 S.W. at 269 ; 299 S.W. at 893 . 7: Dan proposes that this Court adopt a rule that residuary clauses encompass only property that is described in detail in the divorce decree itself. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Universe Life Insurance v. Giles
green
1 sentence2004By this argument, Minnesota Life is essentially asking this Court to adopt a rule allowing insurance companies to delay settlement of a claim until liability is absolutely and conclusively established, *330 not just “reasonably clear.” See Giles, 950 S.W.2d at 56 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville
green
1 sentence2002As noted above, the Supreme Court of Texas has recently stated that the timely filing of a complaint under the Texas Human *553 Rights Act is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Specialty Retailers, 933 S.W.2d at 492 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Reynolds v. United States
green
2 sentences2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Prince v. Massachusetts
green
2 sentences2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Braunfeld v. Brown
green
2 sentences2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Gillette v. United States
green
2 sentences2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
United States v. Lee
green
2 sentences2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 2001She urges this court to adopt the rule the United States Supreme Court announced in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990): Neutral laws of general application do not violate the First Amendment merely because they infringe on the particular religious convictions of individual citizens. *238 See, e.g., id. (rejecting religious objections to criminalization of peyote); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (rejecting religious objections to social security); Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437 , 91 S.Ct. 828 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Frye v. United States
red
1 sentence1990Appellant urges this Court to adopt the test set out in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), and hold that DNA testing has not gained general acceptance in the scientific community, and therefore, such evidence should have been suppressed. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.
red
2 sentences1985However, Transworld is essentially asking this court to adopt the rule of Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic SS Corp., 350 U.S. 124 , 76 S.Ct. 232 , 100 L.Ed. 133 (1956) and Garner v. Cities Services Tankers Corporation, 456 F.2d 476 (5th Cir.1972). 1985However, Transworld is essentially asking this court to adopt the rule of Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic SS Corp., 350 U.S. 124 , 76 S.Ct. 232 , 100 L.Ed. 133 (1956) and Garner v. Cities Services Tankers Corporation, 456 F.2d 476 (5th Cir.1972). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
cluster 301928
green
1 sentence1985However, Transworld is essentially asking this court to adopt the rule of Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic SS Corp., 350 U.S. 124 , 76 S.Ct. 232 , 100 L.Ed. 133 (1956) and Garner v. Cities Services Tankers Corporation, 456 F.2d 476 (5th Cir.1972). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.