Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1975–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Liszka v. SILVERADO STEAK & SEAFOOD CO., INC.green1 sentence2001Process against any other dissolved corporation shall be served in accordance with s. 48.081. § 48.101, Fla. Stat. (2000). [1] In reply to this argument, the Cannellas rely upon section 607.1405(2)(g), Florida Statutes (1991), which, at the time of the service in this case, provided that "[d]issolution of a corporation does not ... [t]erminate the authority of the registered agent of the corporation," in urging this Court to adopt the analysis of the Fifth District in Liszka, 703 So.2d at 1228 (interpreting the law after the 1989 revision to the business corporation act as permitting process o | 1 | 1 |
Wong v. Gonzalez & Kennedy, Inc.green1 sentence2001Process against any other dissolved corporation shall be served in accordance with s. 48.081. § 48.101, Fla. Stat. (2000). [1] In reply to this argument, the Cannellas rely upon section 607.1405(2)(g), Florida Statutes (1991), which, at the time of the service in this case, provided that "[d]issolution of a corporation does not ... [t]erminate the authority of the registered agent of the corporation," in urging this Court to adopt the analysis of the Fifth District in Liszka, 703 So.2d at 1228 (interpreting the law after the 1989 revision to the business corporation act as permitting process o | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Report of Fam. Ct. Steering Comm.
green
2 sentences2014Family Courts IV, 794 So.2d at 526 . 2005The new rule implements the Steering Committee's recommendation that the Court adopt a rule of judicial administration that would "require judges who are assigned to different cases involving the same family to confer, and to coordinate pending litigation to maximize judicial efforts, avoid inconsistent court orders, and avoid multiple court appearances by the parties on the same issues." Id. at 526 . | 3 | 2005–2014 |
Foster v. State
green
1 sentence1997Id. at 468 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
People v. Rogers
green
2 sentences1985Miller urged this court to adopt the rule enunciated in People v. Rogers, 48 N.Y.2d 167 , 422 N.Y.S.2d 18 , 397 N.E.2d 709 (C.A. 1979). 1985Miller urged this court to adopt the rule enunciated in People v. Rogers, 48 N.Y.2d 167 , 422 N.Y.S.2d 18 , 397 N.E.2d 709 (C.A. 1979). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Wilson v. State
green
2 sentences1981The language of Wilson v. State, 253 Ind. 585 , 255 N.E.2d 817 , 821 22 (1970) is compelling in this regard: Appellant suggests that this court adopt a principle whereby any restraint and transportation of the victim would be considered only as an integral part of the charge of rape and not as a separate charge of kidnapping. 1981The language of Wilson v. State, 253 Ind. 585 , 255 N.E.2d 817 , 821 22 (1970) is compelling in this regard: Appellant suggests that this court adopt a principle whereby any restraint and transportation of the victim would be considered only as an integral part of the charge of rape and not as a separate charge of kidnapping. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
State v. Lyons
green
1 sentence1977State v. Lyons, 293 So.2d 391 (4 D.C.A. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Hoffman v. Jones
green
1 sentence1975It has been modified in many instances by judicial decision, such as those establishing the doctrine of `last clear chance', `appreciable degree' and others." Petitioner urges that in view of the rationale of this Court in Hoffman, supra, social policy and equity dictate that this Court adopt a rule of apportionment among joint tortfeasors whereby the jury would determine the proportional percentage of causal negligence of each of the joint tortfeasors. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.