Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2022 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2022See [Williams, 59 N.J. at 233-34 ].2 Based on these findings, the judge awarded Dana counsel fees of $26,332, which actually consisted of $25,265 in fees already incurred, $192 in costs, and $875 of additional anticipated services (2.5 hours billed at $350 per hour). 2022See [Williams, 59 N.J. at 233-34 ].2 Based on these findings, the judge awarded Dana counsel fees of $26,332, which actually consisted of $25,265 in fees already incurred, $192 in costs, and $875 of additional anticipated services (2.5 hours billed at $350 per hour). | 2 | 2 |
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Servicesgreen1 sentence2019Dep't of Human Servs., 204 N.J. 320, 329-30 (2010); Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Darmanin v. Darmaningreen2 sentences1992See also Darmanin v. Darmanin, 224 N.J. 1992See also Darmanin v. Darmanin, 224 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences1967Johnson v. State, 237 Md. 283 , 206 A. 2d 138, 142-143 (C. 1967Johnson v. State, 237 Md. 283 , 206 A. 2d 138, 142-143 (C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kelvin Williams (071306)
green
2 sentences2021The Court clarified the correct standard for close- of-evidence motions in Williams, 218 N.J. at 594 , and the Williams standard applies to post-verdict motions as well. 30 (“[T]he proper issue is simply whether the evidence, viewed in its entirety including the legitimate inferences therefrom, is sufficient to enable a jury to find that the State’s charge has been established beyond reasonable doubt.”). 2021The Court clarified the correct standard for close- of-evidence motions in Williams, 218 N.J. at 594 , and the Williams standard applies to post-verdict motions as well. 30 (“[T]he proper issue is simply whether the evidence, viewed in its entirety including the legitimate inferences therefrom, is sufficient to enable a jury to find that the State’s charge has been established beyond reasonable doubt.”). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences1997First, as the trial court noted, there were additional requirements of the Williams test for court closure that defendant could not satisfy, including demonstrating that an open court would result in a "realistic likelihood of prejudice to a fair trial," id. at 63 , 459 A. 2d 641 , and that there were no reasonable alternatives to court closure. 1997First, as the trial court noted, there were additional requirements of the Williams test for court closure that defendant could not satisfy, including demonstrating that an open court would result in a "realistic likelihood of prejudice to a fair trial," id. at 63 , 459 A. 2d 641 , and that there were no reasonable alternatives to court closure. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Marshall
green
2 sentences1997Moreover, there is "no indication that any juror [at defendant's trial] was so tainted by pretrial publicity as to affect the deliberative process." Marshall I, supra, 123 N.J. at 78 , 586 A. 2d 85 . 1997Moreover, there is "no indication that any juror [at defendant's trial] was so tainted by pretrial publicity as to affect the deliberative process." Marshall I, supra, 123 N.J. at 78 , 586 A. 2d 85 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences1996Id. at 97 , 634 A.2d 576 . 1996Id. at 97 , 634 A.2d 576 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Williams v. Page
green
1 sentence1992At best, Williams' claim is that although he committed the acts charged, he was insane at the time and could not be found guilty of the necessary criminal intent to justify conviction of a crime. [ Id. at 367, 389 A. 2d 1012 (emphasis added).] In the instant case, as in Williams, the only reason for the favorable determination was the lack of the requisite criminal intent. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.