close hearing (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

close hearing in Arkansas

9 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Daniels v. Statered
ark · 2008 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009Heard renewed his motion for a directed verdict at the close of the defense’s case, citing Daniels v. State, 373 Ark. 536, 545 , 285 S.W.3d 205, 211 (2008), in which this court held that “the law in Arkansas is that recovering gambling losses is not theft.” The trial court again denied the motion, concluding that the holding in Daniels and a case cited therein-Davidson v. State, 200 Ark. 495 , 139 S.W.2d 409 (1940) — were specifically limited to gambling losses.

2009Heard renewed his motion for a directed verdict at the close of the defense’s case, citing Daniels v. State, 373 Ark. 536, 545 , 285 S.W.3d 205, 211 (2008), in which this court held that “the law in Arkansas is that recovering gambling losses is not theft.” The trial court again denied the motion, concluding that the holding in Daniels and a case cited therein-Davidson v. State, 200 Ark. 495 , 139 S.W.2d 409 (1940) — were specifically limited to gambling losses.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Brewer v. Everett neutral
arkctapp · 1981
1 sentence

2024Code Ann. § 11-10-525 (c)(1) (Repl. 2012) that “[u]pon review on its own motion or upon appeal and on the basis of evidence previously submitted in the case, or upon the basis of any additional evidence as it may direct be taken, the Board may affirm, modify, reverse, dismiss, or remand the case.” The City also contends that Brewer v. Everett and Leckenby Co., 3 Ark.

12024–2024
Duty v. Watkins green
ark · 1989
2 sentences

2021Duty v. Watkins, 298 Ark. 437 , 768 S.W.2d 526 (1989).

2021Duty v. Watkins, 298 Ark. 437 , 768 S.W.2d 526 (1989).

12021–2021
Holloway v. State neutral
ark · 2017
1 sentence

2017He was told what those years were.” At the close of the hearing, 4 Cite as 2017 Ark. 265 the circuit court announced that it would take Holloway’s case under advisement.

12017–2017
Johnson v. State neutral
ark · 2017
1 sentence

2017At the close of the hearing, the circuit court denied Johnson’s motion and explained, With regard to Defendant’s Exhibit #2, which is the Facebook post of Jimmy Aldridge, again the Court finds that this Facebook post of Mr. Aldridge 7 Cite as 2017 Ark. 206 does not in any fashion establish or suggest perjury on any material issue at trial.

12017–2017
Davidson v. State green
ark · 1940
2 sentences

2009Heard renewed his motion for a directed verdict at the close of the defense’s case, citing Daniels v. State, 373 Ark. 536, 545 , 285 S.W.3d 205, 211 (2008), in which this court held that “the law in Arkansas is that recovering gambling losses is not theft.” The trial court again denied the motion, concluding that the holding in Daniels and a case cited therein-Davidson v. State, 200 Ark. 495 , 139 S.W.2d 409 (1940) — were specifically limited to gambling losses.

2009Heard renewed his motion for a directed verdict at the close of the defense’s case, citing Daniels v. State, 373 Ark. 536, 545 , 285 S.W.3d 205, 211 (2008), in which this court held that “the law in Arkansas is that recovering gambling losses is not theft.” The trial court again denied the motion, concluding that the holding in Daniels and a case cited therein-Davidson v. State, 200 Ark. 495 , 139 S.W.2d 409 (1940) — were specifically limited to gambling losses.

12009–2009
Rockefeller v. Rockefeller green
ark · 1998
2 sentences

2007At the close of the hearing, the trial court announced that it found Rockefeller v. Rockefeller, 335 Ark. 145 , 980 S.W.2d 255 (1998), controlling because it dealt with an independent contract which was incorporated into a divorce decree.

2007At the close of the hearing, the trial court announced that it found Rockefeller v. Rockefeller, 335 Ark. 145 , 980 S.W.2d 255 (1998), controlling because it dealt with an independent contract which was incorporated into a divorce decree.

12007–2007
Childress v. McManus green
ark · 1984
2 sentences

1989In Childress v. McManus, 282 Ark. 255 , 668 S.W.2d 9 (1984), a chancellor held that a divorce announced from the bench at the close of a hearing was valid although the husband died , before the decree was entered.

1989In Childress v. McManus, 282 Ark. 255 , 668 S.W.2d 9 (1984), a chancellor held that a divorce announced from the bench at the close of a hearing was valid although the husband died , before the decree was entered.

11989–1989
Smith v. State neutral
ark · 1967
1 sentence

1980Brewer v. State, 257 Ark. 51 ; Crow v. State, 248 Ark. 1051 ; Smith v. State, 241 Ark. 748 .

11980–1980
Crow v. State neutral
ark · 1970
1 sentence

1980Brewer v. State, 257 Ark. 51 ; Crow v. State, 248 Ark. 1051 ; Smith v. State, 241 Ark. 748 .

11980–1980
Brewer v. State green
ark · 1974
1 sentence

1980Brewer v. State, 257 Ark. 51 ; Crow v. State, 248 Ark. 1051 ; Smith v. State, 241 Ark. 748 .

11980–1980
Herring v. New York green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

1978Appellants recognize that cases such as Herring v. U.S., 422 U.S. 853 , 95 S. Ct. 2550 , 45 L.

1978Appellants recognize that cases such as Herring v. U.S., 422 U.S. 853 , 95 S. Ct. 2550 , 45 L.

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

IL 76 (1909–2026) NY 68 (1881–2026) CA 53 (1892–2026) TX 50 (1916–2025) PA 48 (1944–2026) OH 32 (1917–2025) LA 31 (1950–2025) FL 26 (1939–2017) IN 24 (1871–2020) CT 17 (1944–2016) NJ 17 (1925–2026) MN 17 (1973–2016) MD 15 (1981–2025) AZ 15 (1936–2018) HI 13 (1959–2025) AL 13 (1907–2025) MO 13 (1913–2017) MS 11 (1919–2009) NM 11 (1967–2024) MT 11 (1934–2024) KS 11 (1932–2025) WI 11 (1906–2023) UT 10 (1990–2026) CO 10 (1938–2025) ID 9 (1976–2023) GA 9 (1976–2024) AR 9 (1978–2024) ME 9 (1969–2012) KY 9 (1919–2025) DC 8 (1969–2025) MA 8 (1933–2017) WV 8 (1981–2018) MI 8 (1973–2021) OR 7 (1916–2019) NE 7 (1923–2020) OK 7 (1967–2006) ND 7 (1965–2012) WA 7 (1948–2023) NC 6 (1981–2016) IA 6 (1934–2017) WY 5 (1986–2005) NH 4 (2015–2024) RI 4 (1992–2018) SD 4 (1978–1998) VA 3 (1930–2026) SC 3 (1973–2017) DE 2 (1986–2016) VT 2 (2014–2022) TN 2 (1993–2008) AK 2 (1990–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check