Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Briesemeister v. Lehnergreen2 sentences2010See Briesemeister v. Lehner, 295 Wis.2d 429, 453-55 , 720 N.W.2d 531, 543-44 (Wis.Ct.App.2006) (noting defendant’s reliance on an attorney’s advice precluded the improper motive necessary for a tortious interference claim even if the attorney’s advice was incorrect). 2010See Briesemeister v. Lehner, 295 Wis.2d 429, 453-55 , 720 N.W.2d 531, 543-44 (Wis.Ct.App.2006) (noting defendant’s reliance on an attorney’s advice precluded the improper motive necessary for a tortious interference claim even if the attorney’s advice was incorrect). | 1 | 1 |
Celex Group, Inc. v. Executive Gallery, Inc.green1 sentence1997See, e.g., Kelly-Springfield Tire Co., supra; Breslin, supra. The court in Celex Group, Inc. v. Executive Gallery, Inc., 877 F.Supp. 1114, 1125 (N.D.Ill.1995) noted the difference between standards for meeting the pleading requirements of a tortious interference claim and those for meeting the evidentiary requirements. | 1 | 1 |
Crinkley v. Dow Jones & Co.green1 sentence1997In Crinkley v. Dow Jones & Co., 67 IU.App.3d 869, 24 IU.Dec. 573, 385 N.E.2d 714, 721 (1978), the court observed that while the pleadings require alleging an "identifable” rather than “identified" third party with whom the plaintiffs had a business expectancy, "the third party's specific identity or name is to be revealed at a subsequent time, such as trial.” Second, it appears that in each of the cases cited by Landstrom, there was an identified third party and a specific economic advantage. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tibke v. McDougall
green
2 sentences2005In Tibke, 479 N.W.2d at 908 , the Court defined the tortious interference claim to include the following essential elements: (1) the existence of a valid business relationship or expectancy; (2) knowledge by the interferer of the relationship or expectancy; (3) an intentional and unjustified act of interference on the part of the interferer; (4) proof that the interference caused the harm sustained; and (5) damage to the party whose relationship or expectancy was disrupted. [¶ 38.] Again Stewart focuses his argument regarding the tortious interference claim on his contention that the employmen 2005In Tibke, 479 N.W.2d at 908 , the Court defined the tor-tious interference claim to include the following essential elements: (1) the existence of a valid business relationship or expectancy; (2) knowledge by the interferer of the relationship or expectancy; (3) an intentional and unjustified act of interference on the part of the interferer; (4) proof that the interference caused the harm sustained; and (5) damage to the party whose relationship or expectancy was disrupted. [¶ 38.] Again Stewart focuses his argument regarding the tortious interference claim on his contention that the employme | 3 | 2002–2005 |
DeWitt v. Duce
green
2 sentences2019Therefore, "if adequate relief is available in a probate proceeding, then that remedy must be exhausted before a tortious interference claim may be pursued." Id. 2019Therefore, “if adequate relief is available in a probate proceeding, then that remedy must be exhausted before a tortious interference claim may be pursued.” Id. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Healy Ranch v. Healy
green
1 sentence2025Healy Ranch, Inc. v. Healy, 2022 S.D. 43, ¶ 17 , 978 N.W.2d 786 , 793 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Mueller v. Cedar Shore Resort, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008He relied on our language in Mueller v. Cedar Shore Resort, Inc., in which we considered “whether the officer or director may be held personally liable in a tortious interference claim where the director or officer acted in bad faith or outside the scope of employment.” 2002 SD 38, ¶ 35 , 643 N.W.2d 56, 68 . 2008He relied on our language in Mueller v. Cedar Shore Resort, Inc., in which we considered “whether the officer or director may be held personally liable in a tortious interference claim where the director or officer acted in bad faith or outside the scope of employment.” 2002 SD 38, ¶ 35 , 643 N.W.2d 56, 68 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Landstrom v. Shaver
green
2 sentences2002We decline to recognize such a claim. [¶ 36.] “In Tibke , we held that to establish a Valid business relationship or expectancy,’ there had to be a showing of a ‘contract or business relationship’ between the plaintiff and an identifiable third party.” Landstrom, 1997 SD 25 at ¶ 75 , 561 N.W.2d at 16 (quoting Tibke, 479 N.W.2d at 908-09 ). 2002We decline to recognize such a claim. [¶ 36.] “In Tibke , we held that to establish a Valid business relationship or expectancy,’ there had to be a showing of a ‘contract or business relationship’ between the plaintiff and an identifiable third party.” Landstrom, 1997 SD 25 at ¶ 75 , 561 N.W.2d at 16 (quoting Tibke, 479 N.W.2d at 908-09 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Breslin v. Vornado, Inc.
green
1 sentence1997See, e.g., Kelly-Springfield Tire Co., supra; Breslin, supra. The court in Celex Group, Inc. v. Executive Gallery, Inc., 877 F.Supp. 1114, 1125 (N.D.Ill.1995) noted the difference between standards for meeting the pleading requirements of a tortious interference claim and those for meeting the evidentiary requirements. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.