Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Franklin
green
2 sentences2018It’s what each of you individually and collectively, as 12 of you, believe is beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” Franklin, 2012 IL App (3d) 100618, ¶ 4 . 2017It's what each of you individually and collectively, as 12 of you, believe is beyond a reasonable doubt.' " Franklin , 2012 IL App (3d) 100618 , ¶ 4, 361 Ill.Dec. 301 , 970 N.E.2d 1247 . | 2 | 2017–2018 |
Board of Education v. Ingels
green
2 sentences2004Cf. Board of Education of Minooka Community Consolidated School District No. 201 v. Ingels , 75 Ill. 2004Cf. Board of Education of Minooka Community Consolidated School District No. 201 v. Ingels, 75 Ill. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Dilatush v. Salyers
neutral
1 sentence1988However, it has also been stated that “in order to obtain equitable relief it is necessary that a complainant must establish the facts supporting such claim by clear and convincing evidence.” Dilatush v. Salyers (1936), 285 Ill. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Singer v. Jennison
neutral
1 sentence1988In an early Illinois Supreme Court case in which a plaintiff sought to enjoin the sale of real estate, the court reviewed the evidence presented at trial and reversed the decree of the trial court stating, “[t]he testimony most decidedly preponderates in favor of the conclusion that the notes and trust deed in dispute were given as collateral security for the payment of the purchase money of the distillery.” (Emphasis added.) (Singer v. Jennison (1871), 60 Ill. 443, 447 .) Thus, under Singer, it would appear that the proper burden of proof for an equity case is a preponderance of evidence stan | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Village of Park Forest v. Angel
green
1 sentence1983(Village of Park Forest v. Angel (1976), 37 Ill. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People v. Dixon
neutral
1 sentence1981We quarrel not with this assertion, having so held in the cases of In re Dixon (1980), 81 Ill. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
United States v. John Digilio, in No. 75-2218. Appeal of Harry Lupo, in No. 75-2219. Appeal of Peter Szwandrak, in No. 75-2220
green
1 sentence1978As the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said in United States v. DiGilio (3d Cir. 1976), 538 F.2d 972 , 988: “Allocation of the burden of proof will be significant, in theory at least, only in the rare case when, assuming the evidence is weighed by the preponderance of evidence standard, the conflicting evidence is in equipoise in the mind of the fact finder. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.