8 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1947–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingogreen2 sentences1997The demand rule was in effect in Mississippi until our adoption in Wells v. State, 288 So.2d 860 (Miss. 1974) of the now familiar four-prong test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). ¶ 60. 1997The demand rule was in effect in Mississippi until our adoption in Wells v. State, 288 So.2d 860 (Miss. 1974) of the now familiar four-prong test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). ¶ 60. | 1 | 4 |
Bailey v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Such a result is not consistent with the interests of defendants, society, or the Constitution.21 This is a clear rejection of this Court’s view that because the defendant “failed to assert his right to a speedy trial in a timely manner . . . , we must weigh this factor against” him.22 19 Bailey v. State, 463 So. 2d 1059, 1062-63 (Miss. 1985) (citing Macon v. State, 295 So. 2d 742 (Miss. 1974); Diddlemeyer v. State, 398 So. 2d 1343 (Miss. 1981)). 20 Barker, 407 U.S. at 527 . 21 Id. at 527-28 . 22 Bateman v. State, 125 So. 3d 616, 631 (Miss. 2013). 18 ¶37. | 1 | 1 |
Bateman v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Such a result is not consistent with the interests of defendants, society, or the Constitution.21 This is a clear rejection of this Court’s view that because the defendant “failed to assert his right to a speedy trial in a timely manner . . . , we must weigh this factor against” him.22 19 Bailey v. State, 463 So. 2d 1059, 1062-63 (Miss. 1985) (citing Macon v. State, 295 So. 2d 742 (Miss. 1974); Diddlemeyer v. State, 398 So. 2d 1343 (Miss. 1981)). 20 Barker, 407 U.S. at 527 . 21 Id. at 527-28 . 22 Bateman v. State, 125 So. 3d 616, 631 (Miss. 2013). 18 ¶37. | 1 | 1 |
Rainbow Rental and Fishing Tools, Inc. v. Delta Underground Storage, Inc.green1 sentence2006For entitlement to attorney's fees pursuant to section 11-53-81, "a plaintiff must secure a `judgment on the claim' in the amount sued for." Rainbow Rental and Fishing Tools, Inc. v. Delta Underground Storage, Inc., 542 So.2d 258, 263 (Miss.1989) (but stating that, had the amount recovered "lacked but a few dollars, being the entire amount sued for on open account, [it would put] an entirely different posture on th[e] case"). | 1 | 1 |
Longanecker v. Diamondhead Country Clubgreen1 sentence2005See Longanecker v. Diamondhead Country Club, 760 So.2d 764, 769-70 (¶¶ 12-13) (Miss.2000). ¶ 21. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wells v. State
green
2 sentences1997The demand rule was in effect in Mississippi until our adoption in Wells v. State, 288 So.2d 860 (Miss. 1974) of the now familiar four-prong test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). ¶ 60. 1994The demand rule was in effect in Mississippi until our adoption in Wells v. State, 288 So. 2d 860 (Miss. 1974) of the now familiar four-prong test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, 470 U.S. 514 , (1972). ¶60. | 2 | 1994–1997 |
Diddlemeyer v. State
green
1 sentence2015Such a result is not consistent with the interests of defendants, society, or the Constitution.21 This is a clear rejection of this Court’s view that because the defendant “failed to assert his right to a speedy trial in a timely manner . . . , we must weigh this factor against” him.22 19 Bailey v. State, 463 So. 2d 1059, 1062-63 (Miss. 1985) (citing Macon v. State, 295 So. 2d 742 (Miss. 1974); Diddlemeyer v. State, 398 So. 2d 1343 (Miss. 1981)). 20 Barker, 407 U.S. at 527 . 21 Id. at 527-28 . 22 Bateman v. State, 125 So. 3d 616, 631 (Miss. 2013). 18 ¶37. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
MacOn v. State
green
1 sentence2015Such a result is not consistent with the interests of defendants, society, or the Constitution.21 This is a clear rejection of this Court’s view that because the defendant “failed to assert his right to a speedy trial in a timely manner . . . , we must weigh this factor against” him.22 19 Bailey v. State, 463 So. 2d 1059, 1062-63 (Miss. 1985) (citing Macon v. State, 295 So. 2d 742 (Miss. 1974); Diddlemeyer v. State, 398 So. 2d 1343 (Miss. 1981)). 20 Barker, 407 U.S. at 527 . 21 Id. at 527-28 . 22 Bateman v. State, 125 So. 3d 616, 631 (Miss. 2013). 18 ¶37. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Reid v. Gregory
green
1 sentence1947Stevens et al. v. Barbour, et al., 193 Miss. 109 , 8 So. (2d) 242 ; Odom v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad Co., 101 Miss. 642 , 57 So. 626 ; Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Keeton, 95 Miss. 708 , 49 So. 736 ; Reid v. Gregory, 78 Miss. 247 , 28 So. 835 . *98 The best that appellee can say for his former action is that he made a demand for a claim under an insurance policy issued by appellant, which was contested. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Keeton
neutral
2 sentences1947Stevens et al. v. Barbour, et al., 193 Miss. 109 , 8 So. (2d) 242 ; Odom v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad Co., 101 Miss. 642 , 57 So. 626 ; Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Keeton, 95 Miss. 708 , 49 So. 736 ; Reid v. Gregory, 78 Miss. 247 , 28 So. 835 . *98 The best that appellee can say for his former action is that he made a demand for a claim under an insurance policy issued by appellant, which was contested. 1947Stevens et al. v. Barbour, et al., 193 Miss. 109 , 8 So. (2d) 242 ; Odom v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad Co., 101 Miss. 642 , 57 So. 626 ; Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Keeton, 95 Miss. 708 , 49 So. 736 ; Reid v. Gregory, 78 Miss. 247 , 28 So. 835 . *98 The best that appellee can say for his former action is that he made a demand for a claim under an insurance policy issued by appellant, which was contested. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Sowell v. Sowell
neutral
1 sentence1947Stevens et al. v. Barbour, et al., 193 Miss. 109 , 8 So. (2d) 242 ; Odom v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad Co., 101 Miss. 642 , 57 So. 626 ; Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Keeton, 95 Miss. 708 , 49 So. 736 ; Reid v. Gregory, 78 Miss. 247 , 28 So. 835 . *98 The best that appellee can say for his former action is that he made a demand for a claim under an insurance policy issued by appellant, which was contested. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Odom v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1947Stevens et al. v. Barbour, et al., 193 Miss. 109 , 8 So. (2d) 242 ; Odom v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad Co., 101 Miss. 642 , 57 So. 626 ; Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Keeton, 95 Miss. 708 , 49 So. 736 ; Reid v. Gregory, 78 Miss. 247 , 28 So. 835 . *98 The best that appellee can say for his former action is that he made a demand for a claim under an insurance policy issued by appellant, which was contested. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Stevens v. Barbour
green
2 sentences1947Stevens et al. v. Barbour, et al., 193 Miss. 109 , 8 So. (2d) 242 ; Odom v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad Co., 101 Miss. 642 , 57 So. 626 ; Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Keeton, 95 Miss. 708 , 49 So. 736 ; Reid v. Gregory, 78 Miss. 247 , 28 So. 835 . *98 The best that appellee can say for his former action is that he made a demand for a claim under an insurance policy issued by appellant, which was contested. 1947Stevens et al. v. Barbour, et al., 193 Miss. 109 , 8 So. (2d) 242 ; Odom v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad Co., 101 Miss. 642 , 57 So. 626 ; Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Keeton, 95 Miss. 708 , 49 So. 736 ; Reid v. Gregory, 78 Miss. 247 , 28 So. 835 . *98 The best that appellee can say for his former action is that he made a demand for a claim under an insurance policy issued by appellant, which was contested. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.