Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Znoskogreen2 sentences2004State v. Waite, 813 A.2d 982, 985 (R.I.2003) (citing State v. Znosko, 755 A.2d 832, 834 (R.I.2000)). 2003Therefore, defendant was adequately put on notice of the grounds for the violation, and the requirement of Rule 32(f) and its minimal due-process standards were satisfied.” Znosko, 755 A.2d at 835 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Baptistagreen1 sentence2014See State v. Baptista, 894 A.2d 911 , 914 n. 2 (R.I.2006). 4 . | 1 | 1 |
Foster Glocester Regional School Building Committee v. Settegreen1 sentence2011It is significant that defendants have not challenged the preliminary injunction on the grounds that the hearing justice abused his discretion when he weighed the factors to be considered before issuing a preliminary injunction under this Court’s holding in Iggy's Doughboys, Inc. v. Giroux, 729 A.2d 701, 705 (R.I.1999); see also Foster Glocester Regional School Building Committee v. Sette, 996 A.2d 1120, 1124 (R.I.2010). 7 . | 1 | 1 |
Iggy's Doughboys, Inc. v. Girouxgreen1 sentence2011It is significant that defendants have not challenged the preliminary injunction on the grounds that the hearing justice abused his discretion when he weighed the factors to be considered before issuing a preliminary injunction under this Court’s holding in Iggy's Doughboys, Inc. v. Giroux, 729 A.2d 701, 705 (R.I.1999); see also Foster Glocester Regional School Building Committee v. Sette, 996 A.2d 1120, 1124 (R.I.2010). 7 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Waitegreen1 sentence2004State v. Waite, 813 A.2d 982, 985 (R.I.2003) (citing State v. Znosko, 755 A.2d 832, 834 (R.I.2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Ferrelli v. Department of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick 2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick | 1 | 1 |
Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Boardgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick 2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) ( Rhode Island Alliance ); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) ( Providence Teachers II ); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) ( Providence Teachers I ); Warwick Teachers' Union Local No. 915 v. Wa | 1 | 1 |
Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Boardgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick 2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) ( Rhode Island Alliance ); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) ( Providence Teachers II ); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) ( Providence Teachers I ); Warwick Teachers' Union Local No. 915 v. Wa | 1 | 1 |
Technology Investors v. Town of Westerlygreen2 sentences2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick 2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) ( Rhode Island Alliance ); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) ( Providence Teachers II ); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) ( Providence Teachers I ); Warwick Teachers' Union Local No. 915 v. Wa | 1 | 1 |
Warwick Teachers' Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick School Committeegreen2 sentences2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick 2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) ( Rhode Island Alliance ); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) ( Providence Teachers II ); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) ( Providence Teachers I ); Warwick Teachers' Union Local No. 915 v. Wa | 1 | 1 |
School Committee of Providence v. Board of Regents for Educationgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick 2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) ( Rhode Island Alliance ); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) ( Providence Teachers II ); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) ( Providence Teachers I ); Warwick Teachers' Union Local No. 915 v. Wa | 1 | 1 |
Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick 2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) ( Rhode Island Alliance ); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) ( Providence Teachers II ); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) ( Providence Teachers I ); Warwick Teachers' Union Local No. 915 v. Wa | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580green2 sentences2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) (Rhode Island Alliance); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) (Providence Teachers II); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) (Providence Teachers I); Warwick Teachers’ Union Local No. 915 v. Warwick 2001See State v. Rhode Island Alliance of Social Services Employees, Local 580, SEIU, 747 A.2d 465, 469 (R.I.2000) ( Rhode Island Alliance ); Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers v. State Department of Corrections, 707 A.2d 1229, 1237-38 (R.I.1998); Technology Investors v. Town of Westerly, 689 A.2d 1060, 1062 (R.I.1997); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 388, 391-92 (R.I.1997) ( Providence Teachers II ); Providence Teachers Union v. Providence School Board, 689 A.2d 384, 388 (R.I.1996) ( Providence Teachers I ); Warwick Teachers' Union Local No. 915 v. Wa | 1 | 1 |
State v. Chasegreen1 sentence1993In its most basic form, collateral es-toppel stands for the proposition that “when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 , 90 S.Ct. 1189, 1194 , 26 L.Ed.2d 469 , 475 (1970); see also State v. Chase, 588 A.2d 120 (R.I.1991) (collateral estoppel requires an identity of the issues, an identity of the parties, and a prior proceeding resulting in a final judgment on the merits). | 1 | 1 |
Wolf v. S. H. Wintman Co.green2 sentences1985Wintman Co., 92 R.I. 470, 473 , 169 A.2d 903, 905 (1961), and Caianiello v. Shatkin, 78 R.I. 471, 476-77 , 82 A.2d 826, 829 (1951), where the principle of equitable estoppel was recognized in actions at law to prevent the imposition of the bar of the statute of limitations “where the particular facts warrant” the principle’s application. 1985Wintman Co., 92 R.I. 470, 473 , 169 A.2d 903, 905 (1961), and Caianiello v. Shatkin, 78 R.I. 471, 476-77 , 82 A.2d 826, 829 (1951), where the principle of equitable estoppel was recognized in actions at law to prevent the imposition of the bar of the statute of limitations “where the particular facts warrant” the principle’s application. | 1 | 1 |
Caianiello v. Shatkingreen2 sentences1985Wintman Co., 92 R.I. 470, 473 , 169 A.2d 903, 905 (1961), and Caianiello v. Shatkin, 78 R.I. 471, 476-77 , 82 A.2d 826, 829 (1951), where the principle of equitable estoppel was recognized in actions at law to prevent the imposition of the bar of the statute of limitations “where the particular facts warrant” the principle’s application. 1985Wintman Co., 92 R.I. 470, 473 , 169 A.2d 903, 905 (1961), and Caianiello v. Shatkin, 78 R.I. 471, 476-77 , 82 A.2d 826, 829 (1951), where the principle of equitable estoppel was recognized in actions at law to prevent the imposition of the bar of the statute of limitations “where the particular facts warrant” the principle’s application. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Godette
green
1 sentence2003In Godette, 751 A.2d at 744 , the state gave the defendant a Rule 32(f) notice in which it presented him as a violator for driving a vehicle without the consent of the owner. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Ashe v. Swenson
green
2 sentences1993In its most basic form, collateral es-toppel stands for the proposition that “when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 , 90 S.Ct. 1189, 1194 , 26 L.Ed.2d 469 , 475 (1970); see also State v. Chase, 588 A.2d 120 (R.I.1991) (collateral estoppel requires an identity of the issues, an identity of the parties, and a prior proceeding resulting in a final judgment on the merits). 1993In its most basic form, collateral es-toppel stands for the proposition that “when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 , 90 S.Ct. 1189, 1194 , 26 L.Ed.2d 469 , 475 (1970); see also State v. Chase, 588 A.2d 120 (R.I.1991) (collateral estoppel requires an identity of the issues, an identity of the parties, and a prior proceeding resulting in a final judgment on the merits). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Martin
green
2 sentences1989An example of actual notice of the grounds of a violation sufficient to comply with Rule 32(f) is found in State v. Martin, 116 R.I. 501 , 358 A.2d 679 (1976). 1989An example of actual notice of the grounds of a violation sufficient to comply with Rule 32(f) is found in State v. Martin, 116 R.I. 501 , 358 A.2d 679 (1976). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Lanigan
green
2 sentences1989A case in which the lack of notice of the alleged grounds of a violation required reversal is State v. Lanigan, 114 R.I. 514 , 335 A.2d 917 (1975). 1989A case in which the lack of notice of the alleged grounds of a violation required reversal is State v. Lanigan, 114 R.I. 514 , 335 A.2d 917 (1975). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.