Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
California v. Ciraologreen2 sentences1987See California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. ___ , 106 S.Ct. 1809 , 90 L.Ed.2d 210 (1986); Stewart v. State, 681 S.W.2d 774 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, pet. ref'd). 1987See California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. ___ , 106 S.Ct. 1809 , 90 L.Ed.2d 210 (1986); Stewart v. State, 681 S.W.2d 774 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, pet. ref'd). | 2 | 2 |
Ngo v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Ngo v. State, 175 S.W.3d 738, 744 (Tex.Crim.App.2005); accord Middleton v. State, 125 S.W.3d 450, 453 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). | 1 | 1 |
Middleton v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Ngo v. State, 175 S.W.3d 738, 744 (Tex.Crim.App.2005); accord Middleton v. State, 125 S.W.3d 450, 453 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). | 1 | 1 |
Abdnor v. Stategreen1 sentence1998Abdnor v. State, 871 S.W.2d 726, 731 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Phuong Anh Thi Truong v. Sears Roebuck & Co.green1 sentence1998Truong v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 945 S.W.2d 178, 180 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
Heredia v. Stategreen1 sentence1982Jones v. State, supra, 596 S.W.2d at 138 ; Heredia v. State, 528 S.W.2d 847, 852 (Tex.Crim.App.1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Katz v. United States
green
2 sentences1989Because we find the Court of Appeals’ summary of the law in this area to be excellent we quote extensively from its opinion: “Since the decision in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967), the following twofold inquiry has been used to determine whether a search complies with the Fourth Amendment: (1) whether an individual, by his conduct, exhibits an actual, subjective expectation of privacy; and (2) whether that expectation of privacy is one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. 1989Because we find the Court of Appeals’ summary of the law in this area to be excellent we quote extensively from its opinion: “Since the decision in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967), the following twofold inquiry has been used to determine whether a search complies with the Fourth Amendment: (1) whether an individual, by his conduct, exhibits an actual, subjective expectation of privacy; and (2) whether that expectation of privacy is one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. | 3 | 1987–1989 |
Smith v. Maryland
red
2 sentences1989Oliver v. United States, [466] U.S. [170], 104 S.Ct. 1735, 1740 , 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 740-741 , 99 S.Ct. 2577, 2580-2581 , 61 L.Ed.2d 220 (1979). 1989Oliver v. United States, [466] U.S. [170], 104 S.Ct. 1735, 1740 , 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 740-741 , 99 S.Ct. 2577, 2580-2581 , 61 L.Ed.2d 220 (1979). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Oliver v. United States
green
2 sentences1989Oliver v. United States, [466] U.S. [170], 104 S.Ct. 1735, 1740 , 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 740-741 , 99 S.Ct. 2577, 2580-2581 , 61 L.Ed.2d 220 (1979). 1989Oliver v. United States, [466] U.S. [170], 104 S.Ct. 1735, 1740 , 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 740-741 , 99 S.Ct. 2577, 2580-2581 , 61 L.Ed.2d 220 (1979). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Stewart v. State
green
1 sentence1987See California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. ___ , 106 S.Ct. 1809 , 90 L.Ed.2d 210 (1986); Stewart v. State, 681 S.W.2d 774 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, pet. ref'd). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Jones v. State
green
1 sentence1982Jones v. State, supra, 596 S.W.2d at 138 ; Heredia v. State, 528 S.W.2d 847, 852 (Tex.Crim.App.1975). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
McCarty v. McCarty
red
2 sentences1982The McCarty opinion, after quoting the very language relied on by Justice Cantu, states, “It is to this twofold inquiry that we now turn.” 453 U.S. at 220 , 101 S.Ct. at 2735 . 1982The McCarty opinion, after quoting the very language relied on by Justice Cantu, states, “It is to this twofold inquiry that we now turn.” 453 U.S. at 220 , 101 S.Ct. at 2735 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.