exceptions to the general rule (West Virginia) · Go Syfert
← West Virginia issues

exceptions to the general rule in West Virginia

8 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1908–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
cluster 676559green
ca8 · 1994 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See Grand Lab’ys, Inc. v. Midcon Labs of Iowa, 32 F.3d 1277 , 1281 n.5 (8th Cir. 1994) (“Most jurisdictions hold that a prerequisite to the imposition of liability against a corporation under any of the four exceptions to the nonliability of successors is a transfer or sale of all, or substantially all, the assets of the predecessor to the successor.”); Edwards v. Black Twig Mktg. & Commc’ns LLC, 418 S.W.3d 512, 521 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013) (holding “that a transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of one corporation to another is a prerequisite to corporate successor liability under any o

11
Edwards v. Black Twig Marketing & Communications LLCgreen
moctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See Grand Lab’ys, Inc. v. Midcon Labs of Iowa, 32 F.3d 1277 , 1281 n.5 (8th Cir. 1994) (“Most jurisdictions hold that a prerequisite to the imposition of liability against a corporation under any of the four exceptions to the nonliability of successors is a transfer or sale of all, or substantially all, the assets of the predecessor to the successor.”); Edwards v. Black Twig Mktg. & Commc’ns LLC, 418 S.W.3d 512, 521 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013) (holding “that a transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of one corporation to another is a prerequisite to corporate successor liability under any o

11
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,752 Melvin Williams v. Bowman Livestock Equipment Companygreen
ca10 · 1991 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Co., 927 F.2d 1128, 1132 (10th Cir. 1991) (applying Oklahoma law and observing that “successor liability can be imposed . . . in limited circumstances [when there has been] a sale or transfer of all, or substantially all, the assets of a corporation”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Thomas green
wva · 1974
2 sentences

1992In syllabus point 2 of Dolin , we noted the exceptions to the general rule: ‘The exceptions permitting evidence of collateral crimes and charges to be admissible against an accused are recognized as follows: the evidence is admissible if it tends to establish (1) motive; (2) intent; (3) the absence of mistake or accident; (4) a common scheme or plan embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the others; and (5) the identity of the person charged with the commission of the crime on trial.’ Syllabus Point 12, State v. Thomas, 157

1992In syllabus point 2 of Dolin , we noted the exceptions to the general rule: ‘The exceptions permitting evidence of collateral crimes and charges to be admissible against an accused are recognized as follows: the evidence is admissible if it tends to establish (1) motive; (2) intent; (3) the absence of mistake or accident; (4) a common scheme or plan embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the others; and (5) the identity of the person charged with the commission of the crime on trial.’ Syllabus Point 12, State v. Thomas, 157

31980–1992
State v. Dolin green
wva · 1986
2 sentences

1992However, we went on to note “that there are so many exceptions to the rule [barring collateral crimes] that it is difficult to determine which is more extensive — the rule or its acknowledged exceptions.” 9 176 W.Va. at 693 , 347 S.E.2d at 213 .

1992However, we went on to note “that there are so many exceptions to the rule [barring collateral crimes] that it is difficult to determine which is more extensive — the rule or its acknowledged exceptions.” 9 176 W.Va. at 693 , 347 S.E.2d at 213 .

11992–1992
Clark v. People green
ill · 1906
2 sentences

1949Clark v. People, 224 Ill. 554 , 79 N. E. 941 ; State v. Durkee, 68 R.

1949Clark v. People, 224 Ill. 554 , 79 N. E. 941 ; State v. Durkee, 68 R.

11949–1949
Bartlett v. Patton green
wva · 1889
1 sentence

1934In accord: Bartlett v. Patton, 33 W.

11934–1934
Norton v. Webb neutral
· 1853
1 sentence

1917Based on Norton v. Webb, 36 Me. 270 , 58 Am.

11917–1917
Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co. green
scotus · 1882
1 sentence

1908Miltenberger v. Logansport, 106 U. S. 286 ; Kneeland v. I. & T.

11908–1908

Where else courts name it

NY 92 (1863–2026) TX 72 (1881–2025) CA 57 (1865–2025) NC 49 (1899–2026) PA 44 (1865–2025) AL 40 (1886–2025) MO 36 (1891–2025) GA 35 (1900–2017) IL 30 (1881–2022) VA 30 (1928–2026) KS 28 (1896–2026) IN 28 (1885–2020) OK 26 (1921–2023) MD 25 (1850–2024) NV 19 (1934–2022) KY 17 (1909–2024) WI 16 (1883–2025) IA 16 (1899–1984) MI 16 (1931–2022) LA 16 (1903–2023) FL 15 (1914–2017) WA 15 (1917–2018) CO 15 (1918–2025) OR 12 (1887–2020) CT 12 (1899–2025) UT 11 (1906–2020) AZ 10 (1955–2011) TN 10 (1928–2017) NJ 10 (1896–2025) ID 9 (1905–2009) OH 9 (1929–2025) WV 8 (1908–2022) MN 8 (1909–2011) MA 8 (1878–2021) NE 8 (1888–1979) MS 7 (1924–2021) AR 7 (1914–1963) NM 6 (1902–1992) MT 6 (1981–2015) SC 5 (1925–2023) SD 5 (1912–1993) VT 4 (1879–2025) DE 3 (1913–2019) RI 2 (1978–1981) AK 2 (1979–2026) ME 2 (1984–2001) PR 2 (1907–1932)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check