Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1989–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beaver v. Stategreen2 sentences1998"One of the most recent cases summarizing the Alabama rule on this subject is Beaver v. State, 455 So.2d 253, 257 (Ala. Crim.App.1984): "`"In a criminal prosecution the state may prove that the accused engaged in flight to avoid prosecution ... as tending to show the accused's consciousness of guilt.... 1998"One of the most recent cases summarizing the Alabama rule on this subject is Beaver v. State , 455 So.2d 253 , 257 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984): "`"In a criminal prosecution the state may prove that the accused engaged in flight to avoid prosecution . . . as tending to show the accused's consciousness of guilt. . . . | 1 | 3 |
Ex Parte Kinggreen1 sentence2015See Ex parte King, 776 So.2d 31, 35 (Ala.2000); DaLee v. Crosby Lumber Co., 561 So.2d 1086, 1090-91 (Ala.1990). | 1 | 1 |
DaLee v. Crosby Lumber Co., Inc.green1 sentence2015See Ex parte King, 776 So.2d 31, 35 (Ala.2000); DaLee v. Crosby Lumber Co., 561 So.2d 1086, 1090-91 (Ala.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Logginsgreen1 sentence2007“The certificate of analysis shall give the name and address of the facility in which the examination or analysis was made, and it shall be signed by and sworn to as true and correct, under penalty of law, by the person making the examination or analysis.” “ ‘The question of admissibility of evidence is generally left to the discretion of the trial court, and the trial court’s determination on that question will not be reversed except upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion.’ ” Gavin v. State, 891 So.2d 907, 963 (Ala.Crim.App.2003)(quot-ing Ex parte Loggins, 771 So.2d 1093,1103 (Ala.2000)) | 1 | 1 |
Gavin v. Stategreen1 sentence2007“The certificate of analysis shall give the name and address of the facility in which the examination or analysis was made, and it shall be signed by and sworn to as true and correct, under penalty of law, by the person making the examination or analysis.” “ ‘The question of admissibility of evidence is generally left to the discretion of the trial court, and the trial court’s determination on that question will not be reversed except upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion.’ ” Gavin v. State, 891 So.2d 907, 963 (Ala.Crim.App.2003)(quot-ing Ex parte Loggins, 771 So.2d 1093,1103 (Ala.2000)) | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. State
green
2 sentences2025The notice shall include a copy of the certificate of analysis.' "Section 12-21-302(a), Ala. Code 1975, states: 10 SC-2024-0532 " 'The party against whom the certificate is offered may request, not later than 30 days prior to the commencement of the hearing or trial, a hearing to show cause why a subpoena should be issued for cross-examination of the person who performed the examination or analysis.' "In Brown v. State, 939 So. 2d 957 (Ala. Crim. 2024The notice shall include a copy of the certificate of analysis." Section 12-21-302(a), Ala. Code 1975, states: "The party against whom the certificate is offered may request, not later than 30 days prior to the commencement of the hearing or trial, a hearing to show cause why a subpoena should be issued for cross-examination of the person who performed the examination or analysis." In Brown v. State, 939 So. 2d 957 (Ala. Crim. | 2 | 2024–2025 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.