7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1918–1995 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
County of Mobile v. Bensongreen2 sentences1995Then in County of Mobile v. Benson, 521 So.2d 992, 995 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988), citing Campbell and Fordham , this court again held that to recover for a back injury, the employee must show that in the performance of his duties he was exposed to a danger or risk materially in excess of that to which people not so employed are exposed, i.e., legal causation. 1995Then in County of Mobile v. Benson , 521 So.2d 992 , 995 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988), citing Campbell and Fordham , this court again held that to recover for a back injury, the employee must show that in the performance of his duties he was exposed to a danger or risk materially in excess of that to which people not so employed are exposed, i.e., legal causation. | 1 | 1 |
McGee v. Stategreen1 sentence1986See, e.g., McGee v. State , 467 So.2d 685 , 690-91 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985); McLester v. State , 460 So.2d 870 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ragland Brick Co. v. Campbell
green
2 sentences1995In Ragland Brick Co. v. Campbell, 409 So.2d 443 (Ala.Civ.App.1982), this court extended the requirement of proving "excessive exposure" causation to a leg and back injury, citing Howard. 1995In Ragland Brick Co. v. Campbell , 409 So.2d 443 (Ala.Civ.App. 1982), this court extended the requirement of proving "excessive exposure" causation to a leg and back injury, citing Howard. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Wilson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1994Co. , 540 So.2d 749 (Ala. 1989), is on point in this regard, and in the interest of brevity, we do not state an extended analysis of the policy provisions relating to this exclusion. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Solem v. Helm
red
1 sentence1986Then, rather than engaging in the extended analysis of Solem , we need decide only whether Maddox's sentence is within constitutional limits. 2 Id. at 290, n. 16 , 103 S.Ct. at 3009 , n. 16. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
McLester v. State
green
1 sentence1986See, e.g., McGee v. State , 467 So.2d 685 , 690-91 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985); McLester v. State , 460 So.2d 870 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Rummel v. Estelle
green
2 sentences1986We use this opportunity to, once again, apply the principles expounded in Rummel v. Estelle , 445 U.S. 263 , 100 S.Ct. 1133 , 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980), rather than the extended analysis of traditional proportionality, as set forth in Solem. 1986We use this opportunity to, once again, apply the principles expounded in Rummel v. Estelle , 445 U.S. 263 , 100 S.Ct. 1133 , 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980), rather than the extended analysis of traditional proportionality, as set forth in Solem. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Cupp v. Murphy
green
2 sentences1981In Cupp v. Murphy , 412 U.S. 291 , 93 S.Ct. 2000 , 36 L.Ed.2d 900 (1973), the Court extended this doctrine to searches and seizures of evanescent evidence that were not incident to arrests. 1981In Cupp v. Murphy , 412 U.S. 291 , 93 S.Ct. 2000 , 36 L.Ed.2d 900 (1973), the Court extended this doctrine to searches and seizures of evanescent evidence that were not incident to arrests. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.
red
2 sentences1977In the plurality opinion in Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc. , 403 U.S. 29 , 91 S.Ct. 1811 , 29 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971), the Court extended the privilege to defamatory falsehoods relating to "private persons" in those situations where the statements concerned matters of general or public interest. 1977In the plurality opinion in Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc. , 403 U.S. 29 , 91 S.Ct. 1811 , 29 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971), the Court extended the privilege to defamatory falsehoods relating to "private persons" in those situations where the statements concerned matters of general or public interest. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
green
2 sentences1977In Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. , 418 U.S. 323 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 , 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974), however, the Court retreated from this extension of the privilege to private persons, using the rationale *Page 460 that "the States should retain substantial latitude in their efforts to enforce a legal remedy for defamatory falsehood injurious to the reputation of a private individual." 418 U.S. at 345 -46 , 94 S.Ct. at 3010 . 1977In Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. , 418 U.S. 323 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 , 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974), however, the Court retreated from this extension of the privilege to private persons, using the rationale *Page 460 that "the States should retain substantial latitude in their efforts to enforce a legal remedy for defamatory falsehood injurious to the reputation of a private individual." 418 U.S. at 345 -46 , 94 S.Ct. at 3010 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Brooks v. Cox
green
2 sentences1974Brooks v. Cox, 285 Ala. 267 , 231 So.2d 302 . 1974Brooks v. Cox, 285 Ala. 267 , 231 So.2d 302 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Hodges v. Sublett
neutral
1 sentence1918Without entering upon an extended analysis of the evidence above set forth, we state our conclusion that it failed to show a mutual assent of the parties to the same thing and in the same sense, as the elementary rule is stated in Hodges v. Sublett, 91 Ala. 588 , 8 South. 800 . | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.