transaction immunity (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

transaction immunity in Colorado

7 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1916–2004 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Application of US Senate Select Com. on Pres. Cam. Act. green
dcd · 1973
2 sentences

1974Judge Sirica in Application of U.S. Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activity, 361 F. Supp. 1270 (D.C. 1973), defined transactional and use immunity as follows: “Transaction immunity may be simply described as that which precludes prosecution for any transaction or affair about which a witness testifies.

1974Judge Sirica in Application of U.S. Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activity, 361 F. Supp. 1270 (D.C. 1973), defined transactional and use immunity as follows: “Transaction immunity may be simply described as that which precludes prosecution for any transaction or affair about which a witness testifies.

21974–1974
Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San Francisco green
scotus · 1978
2 sentences

2004In Kulko , the Supreme Court concluded that a non-resident father's act of allowing his children to move to California to live with their mother, despite a pre-existing separation agreement providing that the children would reside with the father in New York, did not satisfy minimum contacts. 436 U.S. at 94 , 98 S.Ct. 1690 .

2004In Kulko , the Supreme Court concluded that a non-resident father's act of allowing his children to move to California to live with their mother, despite a pre-existing separation agreement providing that the children would reside with the father in New York, did not satisfy minimum contacts. 436 U.S. at 94 , 98 S.Ct. 1690 .

12004–2004
Wheeler v. District Court green
colo · 1974
2 sentences

1979In Wheeler v. District Court, 184 Colo. 193 , 519 P.2d 327 (1974), we recognized and defined the two types of constitutionally permissible statutory immunity — transactional and use-derivative use immunity: “Transaction immunity may be simply described as that which precludes prosecution for any transaction or affair about which a witness testifies.

1979In Wheeler v. District Court, 184 Colo. 193 , 519 P.2d 327 (1974), we recognized and defined the two types of constitutionally permissible statutory immunity — transactional and use-derivative use immunity: “Transaction immunity may be simply described as that which precludes prosecution for any transaction or affair about which a witness testifies.

11979–1979
Unico v. Owen green
nj · 1967
2 sentences

1970Machine Works never obtained the press for which it bargained and, as against Commercial, there is no more obligation upon it to pay the note than there is to pay the installments specified in the contract.” In Unico v. Owen, 50 N.J. 101 , 232 A.2d 405 , the court said: “In the field of negotiable instruments, good faith is a broad concept.

1970Machine Works never obtained the press for which it bargained and, as against Commercial, there is no more obligation upon it to pay the note than there is to pay the installments specified in the contract.” In Unico v. Owen, 50 N.J. 101 , 232 A.2d 405 , the court said: “In the field of negotiable instruments, good faith is a broad concept.

11970–1970
Burton v. Burton neutral
colo · 1937
2 sentences

1960In Burton, Administratrix v. Burton, 100 Colo. 567 , 69 P. (2d) 307 , it was said: “ * * * There is no evidence to support the claim of special trust and confidence save the blood relationship and this is insufficient. * * The findings and conclusions of the trial court are amply sustained by the record.

1960In Burton, Administratrix v. Burton, 100 Colo. 567 , 69 P. (2d) 307 , it was said: “ * * * There is no evidence to support the claim of special trust and confidence save the blood relationship and this is insufficient. * * The findings and conclusions of the trial court are amply sustained by the record.

11960–1960
Upshur v. Briscoe green
scotus · 1891
2 sentences

1916Upshur v. Briscoe, 138 U. S. 365 , 34 L.

1916Upshur v. Briscoe, 138 U. S. 365 , 34 L.

11916–1916

Where else courts name it

NY 150 (1886–2026) GA 78 (1975–2020) AZ 74 (1947–2024) MI 56 (1927–2025) FL 55 (1953–2024) CT 51 (1961–2025) MT 38 (1996–2026) MO 38 (1870–2017) CA 29 (1915–2026) TX 26 (1886–2017) PA 21 (1894–2024) IL 20 (1874–2013) MD 16 (1922–2020) NJ 15 (1882–2024) LA 14 (1905–2015) WV 13 (1914–2021) OH 11 (1925–2021) AL 11 (1912–2005) OK 10 (1929–2004) OR 9 (1903–1998) TN 9 (1944–2009) NM 8 (1938–1991) MS 7 (1878–2016) CO 7 (1916–2004) NC 6 (1913–1989) VA 6 (1992–2008) AR 6 (1922–1979) IA 5 (1882–2016) WY 5 (1935–1991) ND 5 (1901–2002) DE 5 (1969–2025) IN 5 (1924–1999) KS 5 (1903–2019) WI 4 (1927–2019) ME 4 (1974–2021) MN 4 (1914–1997) NE 4 (1963–2025) WA 3 (1957–1995) SD 3 (1968–2023) MA 3 (1980–2017) AK 3 (1973–2026) NH 2 (2000–2014) ID 2 (1979–1997) KY 2 (1937–1951) HI 2 (1970–2001) NV 2 (2017–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check