Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1913–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Abbitt v. . Gregorygreen2 sentences1968Abbitt v. Gregory, 201 N.C. 577, 593, 594 , 160 S.E. 896 ; Mcintosh, Practice and Procedure, 536, 539. 1968Abbitt v. Gregory, 201 N.C. 577, 593, 594 , 160 S.E. 896 ; Mcintosh, Practice and Procedure, 536, 539. | 2 | 3 |
Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueengreen1 sentence1989See Rodgers Builders v. McQueen, 76 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
green
1 sentence1913While technically the title of the machine may not have passed until the price was paid, the sale was actually made in Chicago, and the fact that the price was to be collected in North Carolina is too slender a thread upon which to hang an exception of the transaction from the rule which would otherwise declare the tax to be an interference with interstate commerce.” Deciding the same question in Rhodes v. Iowa, 170 U. S., 412 , and referring to Bowman v. Railway, 125 U. S., 465 , the Court, in stating its conclusion, says: “It might be very convenient and useful in the execution of the policy | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Rhodes v. Iowa
green
1 sentence1913While technically the title of the machine may not have passed until the price was paid, the sale was actually made in Chicago, and the fact that the price was to be collected in North Carolina is too slender a thread upon which to hang an exception of the transaction from the rule which would otherwise declare the tax to be an interference with interstate commerce.” Deciding the same question in Rhodes v. Iowa, 170 U. S., 412 , and referring to Bowman v. Railway, 125 U. S., 465 , the Court, in stating its conclusion, says: “It might be very convenient and useful in the execution of the policy | 1 | 1913–1913 |
American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed
green
1 sentence1913While technically the title of the machine may not have passed until the price was paid, the sale was actually made in Chicago, and the fact that the price was to be collected in North Carolina is too slender a thread upon which to hang an exception of the transaction from a rule which would otherwise declare the tax to be an interference with interstate commerce." He then shows the distinction between State laws interfering with the regulation of commerce which trench upon the domain exclusively occupied by the Congress under the Constitution, and those which do not so interfere, as in the ca | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.