Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
54 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2023 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reed v. Meauxgreen2 sentences2013However, in the somewhat more recent Louisiana Supreme Court case of Reed v. Meaux, 292 So.2d 557 (La.1974), the supreme court aptly describes the uniquely Louisianain [sic] concept of executory process as “an In rem action derived from the civil law; it provides a simple, expeditious, and inexpensive procedure by which creditors may seize and sell property upon which they enjoy a mortgage or privilege.” Reed , at 559. 2013However, in the somewhat more recent Louisiana Supreme Court case of Reed v. Meaux, 292 So.2d 557 (La.1974), the supreme court aptly describes the uniquely Louisianain [sic] concept of executory process as “an In rem action derived from the civil law; it provides a simple, expeditious, and inexpensive procedure by which creditors may seize and sell property upon which they enjoy a mortgage or privilege.” Reed , at 559. | 3 | 4 |
Officer v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.green2 sentences1987See Officer v. American Eagle Fire Insurance Co., 175 La. 581 , 143 So. 500 (1932); Hardy v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co., 172 La. 500 , 134 So. 407 (1931). 1987See Officer v. American Eagle Fire Insurance Co., 175 La. 581 , 143 So. 500 (1932); Hardy v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co., 172 La. 500 , 134 So. 407 (1931). | 3 | 3 |
Hood Motor Company, Inc. v. Lawrencegreen2 sentences2023See Hood Motor Co., Inc. v. Lawrence, 320 So.2d 111, 113 (La. 1975). 2014C.C.P. art. 2638, which provides that ”[i]f the plaintiff is entitled thereto, the court shall order the issuance of a writ of seizure and sale commanding the sheriff to seize and sell the property affected by the mortgage or privilege, as prayed for and according to law.”) The Supreme Court further noted that “the clerk is exercising a quasi-judicial power authorized by the constitution and by statute.” Id. (citing La. | 1 | 3 |
Cent. St. Matthew United Church of Christ v. Atkinsgreen1 sentence2023Matthew, 18-0823, p. 7, 264 So.3d at 1248. | 1 | 1 |
Bankers Trust Co. of California N.A. v. Cooleygreen1 sentence2023R.S. 9:4422 was not applicable to its analysis due to language limiting the application of the statute to instruments that would be negotiable “but for a limitation of personal liability of the maker or comaker secured by a mortgage or privilege.” Id. at 595, fn. 1 . | 1 | 1 |
Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.green1 sentence2022Neither article is applicable here. 5 laws, “[i]t is the original statute, not the interpretive one, that establishes the rights and duties.” Id. (citing Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 360 So. 2d 1331, 1338 (La. 1978)). | 1 | 1 |
Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. Monesgreen2 sentences2010C.C.P. |7art. 2631. 3 Executory process is a “unique and harsh remedy requiring strict construction.” Moore v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co., 528 *1113 So.2d 606, 609 (La.1988)(citing Myrtle Grove Packing Co. v. Mones, 226 La. 287, 291 , 76 So.2d 305, 306 (1954)). 2010C.C.P. |7art. 2631. 3 Executory process is a “unique and harsh remedy requiring strict construction.” Moore v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co., 528 *1113 So.2d 606, 609 (La.1988)(citing Myrtle Grove Packing Co. v. Mones, 226 La. 287, 291 , 76 So.2d 305, 306 (1954)). | 1 | 1 |
American Bank v. Saxenagreen1 sentence2009American Bank v. Saxena, 553 So.2d 836, 844 (La.1989). [8] In Gutierrez v. Travelers Ins. | 1 | 1 |
First State Bank v. Wilsongreen1 sentence2003See First State Bank v. Wilson, 437 So.2d 968 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983); Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. DeBrueys, 200 So.2d 916 (La.App. 1st Cir.1967); Hibernia Homestead and Savings Association v. Fletcher, 181 So.2d 815 (La.App. 4th Cir.1966). | .^Furthermore, La. | 1 | 1 |
| First Financial Bank v. HUNTER FOREST LTD.green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Buckner v. Carmack
green
2 sentences2015Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2631 provides that Executory Proceedings “are those which are used to effect the seizure and sale of property, without previous citation and judgment, to enforce a mortgage or privilege thereon evidenced by an authentic act importing a confession of judgment, ...” As we noted in Mellon, 71 So.3d at 1042 : Louisiana’s executory process itself was held to be constitutional in Buckner v. Carmack, 272 So.2d 326 (La.1973). 1988Hood Motor Co., Inc. v. Lawrence, 320 So.2d 111 (La.1975); Buckner v. Carmack, 272 So.2d 326 (La.1973), appeal dismissed, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974); McMahon, The Historical Development of Executory Procedure in Louisiana, 32 Tul. | 4 | 1974–2015 |
May v. Market Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2023The May Court determined that the mortgage clause at issue was a standard clause and that Louisiana jurisprudence recognizes that standard mortgage clauses create a separate insurance contract between the mortgagee and the insurer.3 Id. at 1084 . 1986A standard mortgage clause creates a separate contract of insurance between the insurer and mortgagee and the "mortgagee shall be protected against loss from any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner, so that it shall not defeat the insurance so far as the interest of the mortgagee is concerned." May v. Market Insurance Company, 387 So.2d 1081 (La. 1980). | 3 | 1984–2023 |
Hardy v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.
neutral
2 sentences1987See Officer v. American Eagle Fire Insurance Co., 175 La. 581 , 143 So. 500 (1932); Hardy v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co., 172 La. 500 , 134 So. 407 (1931). 1987See Officer v. American Eagle Fire Insurance Co., 175 La. 581 , 143 So. 500 (1932); Hardy v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co., 172 La. 500 , 134 So. 407 (1931). | 3 | 1984–1987 |
Mitchell v. VALTEAU
neutral
2 sentences2013Executory process is “used to effect the seizure and sale of property, without previous citation and judgment, to enforce a mortgage or privilege thereon evidenced by an authentic act importing a confession of judgment.” LSA-C.C.P. art. 2631; Mitchell v. Valteau, 09-1095, p. 6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/27/10), 30 So.3d 1108, 1112 . 2011Ex-ecutory process is a “unique and harsh remedy requiring strict construction.” Mitchell v. Valteau, 09-1095 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/27/10) , 30 So.3d 1108 . | 2 | 2011–2013 |
Hibernia Homestead & Savings Ass'n v. Lorino
neutral
2 sentences2003See First State Bank v. Wilson, 437 So.2d 968 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983); Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. DeBrueys, 200 So.2d 916 (La.App. 1st Cir.1967); Hibernia Homestead and Savings Association v. Fletcher, 181 So.2d 815 (La.App. 4th Cir.1966). | .^Furthermore, La. 1967Hibernia Homestead and Savings Ass'n. v. Fletcher, La.App., 181 So.2d 815 . | 2 | 1967–2003 |
Cale J. Holder, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana v. Arthur Banks
green
2 sentences1988Hood Motor Co., Inc. v. Lawrence, 320 So.2d 111 (La.1975); Buckner v. Carmack, 272 So.2d 326 (La.1973), appeal dismissed, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974); McMahon, The Historical Development of Executory Procedure in Louisiana, 32 Tul. 1987Buckner v. Carmack, 272 So.2d 326 (La.1973). [appeal dismissed by Carmack v. Buckner, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed2d 207 (1974) ]. | 2 | 1987–1988 |
Carmack v. Buckner
green
2 sentences1988Hood Motor Co., Inc. v. Lawrence, 320 So.2d 111 (La.1975); Buckner v. Carmack, 272 So.2d 326 (La.1973), appeal dismissed, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974); McMahon, The Historical Development of Executory Procedure in Louisiana, 32 Tul. 1987Buckner v. Carmack, 272 So.2d 326 (La.1973). [appeal dismissed by Carmack v. Buckner, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed2d 207 (1974) ]. | 2 | 1987–1988 |
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith
green
1 sentence2022Neither article is applicable here. 5 laws, “[i]t is the original statute, not the interpretive one, that establishes the rights and duties.” Id. (citing Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 360 So. 2d 1331, 1338 (La. 1978)). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Caldwell v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc.
green
1 sentence2022(Emphasis added.) Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Sutton v. Adams
neutral
1 sentence2021App. 4 Cir. 5/ 29/ 19), 273 So. 3d 1276 , 1278- 79 The plaintiff' s opposition to motion for sanctions filed in the record of defamation case but related to another action pending before a different division did not move the defamation case forward or defend the matter, and thus was not a step in the prosecution or defense sufficient to interrupt the period for abandonment); Hardy 6 Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 2638 provides "[ i] f the plaintiff is entitled thereto, the court shall order the issuance of a writ of seizure and sale commanding the sheriff to seize and sell the prope | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Deutsche Bank Trust Co. America v. Ochoa
green
2 sentences2016Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Am. v. Ochoa, 12-800 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/23/13) , 120 So.3d 735, 740 . 2016Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Am. v. Ochoa, 12-800 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/23/13) , 120 So.3d 735, 740 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. Smith
green
1 sentence2015Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2631 provides that Executory Proceedings “are those which are used to effect the seizure and sale of property, without previous citation and judgment, to enforce a mortgage or privilege thereon evidenced by an authentic act importing a confession of judgment, ...” As we noted in Mellon, 71 So.3d at 1042 : Louisiana’s executory process itself was held to be constitutional in Buckner v. Carmack, 272 So.2d 326 (La.1973). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Landry v. Landry
neutral
1 sentence2013Landry v. Landry, 12 La. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Avery v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
green
1 sentence2013Proc. art. 2361, entitled Use of executory proceedings, provides: Executory proceedings are those which are used to effect the seizure and sale of property, without previous citation and judgment, to enforce a mortgage or privilege thereon evidenced by an authentic act importing a confession of judgment, and in other cases allowed by law. [Emphasis added.] In the instant matter, Ms. Thomas argues that Countrywide and the trial court erroneously relied on a First Circuit opinion, Avery v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 08-2052 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/13/09) , 15 So.3d 240 , in determining that there was an exec | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. ex rel. Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. v. Carter
green
1 sentence2013Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Carter, 10-663, p. 6 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/25/11), 59 So.3d 1282, 1286 , writ denied, 11-892 (La.4/8/11), 61 So.3d 691 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Davis v. Catlin Specialty Ins. Co., 2011-0401 (La. 4/8/11)
neutral
1 sentence2013Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Carter, 10-663, p. 6 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/25/11), 59 So.3d 1282, 1286 , writ denied, 11-892 (La.4/8/11), 61 So.3d 691 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Colonial Finance, LLC v. Colonial Golf & Country Club, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2013LSA-C.C.P. art. 2634; Colonial Finance, L.L.C. v. Colonial Golf and Country Club, Inc., 11-5, p. 5 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/14/11), 72 So.3d 349, 351 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Lumar v. Mid State Trust II
neutral
1 sentence2011Lumar v. Mid State Trust II, 99-451, p. 5 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/10/99), 749 So.2d 712, 714 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Mooers v. Sosa
green
1 sentence2004App. 5 Cir. 9/25/01), 798 So.2d 200 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Campbell v. Melton
green
1 sentence2004Campbell , 2001-2578 at p. 5 n. 4, 817 So.2d at 74 n. 4. 1 .¡Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 3751 provides that the pendency of an action affecting the title to, or asserting a mortgage or privilege on, immovable property does not constitute notice to a third person unless a notice of pendency of the action (ie., a notice of lis pendens) is filed or recorded as required by LSA-C.C.P. art. 3752. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Davis-Wood Lumber Company v. DeBrueys
green
1 sentence2003See First State Bank v. Wilson, 437 So.2d 968 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983); Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. DeBrueys, 200 So.2d 916 (La.App. 1st Cir.1967); Hibernia Homestead and Savings Association v. Fletcher, 181 So.2d 815 (La.App. 4th Cir.1966). | .^Furthermore, La. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| In Re LeBlanc green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Zeta-Caiman, Ltd. v. Naik green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| McClees v. Lewing neutral | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Bourn v. Wood neutral | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Karst v. Fryar green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Bohn v. La. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Bankston v. Commercial Credit Corp. green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Board of Missions of Methodist Episcopal Church South v. C. D. Craighead Co. neutral | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Poole v. Arculeer green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. v. Fontenot green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Williams green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Meadow Brook National Bank v. Lafayette Royale Apartments, Inc. neutral | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| State ex rel. James v. Shea neutral | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| State ex rel. Allen v. State neutral | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Guillory v. Desormeaux green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Li Rocchi v. Keen green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Louisiana National Bank of Baton Rouge v. Heroman green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Scarborough v. Duke neutral | 1 | 1973–1973 |
| Bickham Motors, Inc. v. Crain green | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.