Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Policegreen2 sentences2023Pa.R.Civ.P. 128. 23 A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Police, 143 A.3d 896, 906 (Pa. 2016). [J-13A-2023, J-13B-2023, J-13C-2023 and J-13D-2023] - 13 construing and giving effect to the text, “we should not interpret statutory words in isolation, but must read them with reference to the context in which they appear.”24 II. 2023Pa.R.Civ.P. 128. 23 A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Police, 143 A.3d 896, 906 (Pa. 2016). [J-13A-2023, J-13B-2023, J-13C-2023 and J-13D-2023] - 13 construing and giving effect to the text, “we should not interpret statutory words in isolation, but must read them with reference to the context in which they appear.”24 II. | 4 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Hollowaygreen2 sentences2007See Holloway, 739 A.2d at 1047-48 . 2007See Holloway, 739 A.2d at 1047-48 . | 1 | 1 |
Mazur v. Merck & Co., Inc.green1 sentence2003The same argument was raised and rejected in Mazur v. Merck & Co. Inc., 742 F. Supp. 239,247 (E.D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Openbrier v. General Mills, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003In support of her position, plaintiff cited Openbrier v. General Mills Inc., 340 Pa. 167 , 16 A.2d 379 (1940), in which the Supreme Court affirmed a decision permitting a defendant to be sued in Washington County. 2003In support of her position, plaintiff cited Openbrier v. General Mills Inc., 340 Pa. 167 , 16 A.2d 379 (1940), in which the Supreme Court affirmed a decision permitting a defendant to be sued in Washington County. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.