Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miranda v. Arizonagreen1 sentence2008See id. | 1 | 1 |
Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corporationgreen1 sentence1993See generally Mediterranean Enters. v. Ssangyong Corp., 708 F.2d 1458 , 1463-64 (9th Cir.1983) (distinguishing narrow "arising under" clauses from broader "arising out of or relating to" clauses in the context of a demand to arbitrate a quantum meruit claim). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dimmitt Chevrolet v. Southeastern Fidelity
green
2 sentences2003Corp., 636 So.2d 700 (Fla.1993),] as "unexpected or unintended." Id. at 1075-76 (citations omitted) (emphasis supplied). 1998This definition comports with the language used in standard comprehensive general liability policies and with the definition of the term "accidental" set forth in Dimmitt as "unexpected or unintended." 636 So.2d at 704 . | 2 | 1998–2003 |
Bellcase v. State
green
1 sentence1985The state necessarily concedes that Rita was in custody, but contends he was not under sentence within the meaning of that requirement in rule 3.850, and relies on Ferguson v. Stone, 415 So.2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), and Bellcase v. State, 406 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), rev. den., 417 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1982), as authority for Rita's lack of standing under the language used in rule 3.850. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Ferguson v. Stone
green
1 sentence1985The state necessarily concedes that Rita was in custody, but contends he was not under sentence within the meaning of that requirement in rule 3.850, and relies on Ferguson v. Stone, 415 So.2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), and Bellcase v. State, 406 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), rev. den., 417 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1982), as authority for Rita's lack of standing under the language used in rule 3.850. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.