Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1904–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Flaherty v. Stategreen1 sentence2015The language used in the instruction was taken from Flaherty v. State, 443 N.E.2d 340, 341 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982), which was a case addressing the sufficiency of a probable cause affidavit. | 1 | 1 |
Morgan v. Stategreen1 sentence2000The language used in the instruction is taken from this Court’s opinion in Truman v. State, 481 N.E.2d 1089 (Ind.1985). 1 However, “[t]he mere fact that certain language or expressions are used in the opinions of this Court to reach its final conclusion does not necessarily make it proper language for instructions to a jury.” Morgan v. State, 544 N.E.2d 143, 148 (Ind.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howard v. State
green
1 sentence2015In finding that the trial court did not err in rejecting the instruction, we explained: “[n]ot only is Flaherty factually inapposite, the trial court in the instant case correctly explained that Howard could argue to the jury whether the confidential informants were adequately searched for contraband before participating in the controlled buy.” Howard, 761 N.E.2d at 454 . [12] In the instant case, Thompson also proffered a jury instruction that was crafted from a case considering the sufficiency of a probably cause affidavit. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Truman v. State
green
1 sentence2000The language used in the instruction is taken from this Court’s opinion in Truman v. State, 481 N.E.2d 1089 (Ind.1985). 1 However, “[t]he mere fact that certain language or expressions are used in the opinions of this Court to reach its final conclusion does not necessarily make it proper language for instructions to a jury.” Morgan v. State, 544 N.E.2d 143, 148 (Ind.1989). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Weinand v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 1326 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Grubbs v. United States
green
1 sentence1989Further, in Grubbs v. United States (N.D.Ind.1984), 581 F.Supp. 536, 541 , the court, applying Indiana law, observed: “The law recognizes that an individual is entitled to be compensated for the loss of the use or the loss of function of a part of the body irrespective of the relationship of that loss to other elements of damages. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Francis v. Franklin
green
2 sentences1988Nevertheless, since the language used in instruction No. 17 was the subject of Sandstrom v. Montana (1979), 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , and Francis v. Franklin (1985), 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 L.Ed.2d 344 , we will consider the issue here. 1988Nevertheless, since the language used in instruction No. 17 was the subject of Sandstrom v. Montana (1979), 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , and Francis v. Franklin (1985), 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 L.Ed.2d 344 , we will consider the issue here. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Sandstrom v. Montana
green
2 sentences1988Nevertheless, since the language used in instruction No. 17 was the subject of Sandstrom v. Montana (1979), 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , and Francis v. Franklin (1985), 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 L.Ed.2d 344 , we will consider the issue here. 1988Nevertheless, since the language used in instruction No. 17 was the subject of Sandstrom v. Montana (1979), 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , and Francis v. Franklin (1985), 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 L.Ed.2d 344 , we will consider the issue here. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Mobley v. State
green
2 sentences1976Schmidt v. State (1970), 255 Ind. 443 , 265 N.E.2d 219 ; Mobley v. State (1949), 227 Ind. 335 , 85 N.E.2d 489 . 1976Schmidt v. State (1970), 255 Ind. 443 , 265 N.E.2d 219 ; Mobley v. State (1949), 227 Ind. 335 , 85 N.E.2d 489 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Schmidt v. State
green
2 sentences1976Schmidt v. State (1970), 255 Ind. 443 , 265 N.E.2d 219 ; Mobley v. State (1949), 227 Ind. 335 , 85 N.E.2d 489 . 1976Schmidt v. State (1970), 255 Ind. 443 , 265 N.E.2d 219 ; Mobley v. State (1949), 227 Ind. 335 , 85 N.E.2d 489 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Hindman v. Timme
neutral
2 sentences1917Hindman v. Timme (1893), 8 Ind. App. 416 , 35 N. E. 1046 ; Van Camp, etc., Iron Co. v. O’Brien (1901), 28 Ind. App 152, 62 N. E. 464 . 10. 1917Hindman v. Timme (1893), 8 Ind. App. 416 , 35 N. E. 1046 ; Van Camp, etc., Iron Co. v. O’Brien (1901), 28 Ind. App 152, 62 N. E. 464 . 10. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Van Camp Hardware & Iron Co. v. O'Brien
green
1 sentence1917Hindman v. Timme (1893), 8 Ind. App. 416 , 35 N. E. 1046 ; Van Camp, etc., Iron Co. v. O’Brien (1901), 28 Ind. App 152, 62 N. E. 464 . 10. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Rissing v. City of Fort Wayne
neutral
1 sentence1904Wayne (1893), 137 Ind. 427 , the Supreme Court quoted with approval the language used and rule declared in Platter v. Board, etc., supra. To the same effect, also, are the following: Union School Tp. v. First Nat. | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.