language used instruction (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

language used instruction in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1944–2024 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Roachegreen
nc · 2004 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021See State v. Roache, 358 N.C. 243, 296 , 595 S.E.2d 381, 415 (2004) (citations omitted) (“The trial court sustained [the] defendant’s objections to the questions specifically addressed by [the] defendant in his brief to this Court.

2021See State v. Roache, 358 N.C. 243, 296 , 595 S.E.2d 381, 415 (2004) (citations omitted) (“The trial court sustained [the] defendant’s objections to the questions specifically addressed by [the] defendant in his brief to this Court.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Aflleje-Torres v. United States green
scotus · 1995
2 sentences

2004Id.

2004Id.

22004–2004
State v. White green
nc · 1998
1 sentence

2024Id.

12024–2024
State v. . Holbrook green
nc · 1943
1 sentence

1944It was urged that the ruling in S. v. Holbrook, 223 N. C., 622 , and 8. v. Baker, 213 N. C., 524 , 196 S. E., 829 , should be applied here, rather than that set out in S. v. Williams, 219 N. C., 365 , 13 S. E. (2d), 617 ; S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9 , 161 S. E., 535 ; and S. v. Anderson, 162 N. O., 571, 77 S. E., 238 .

11944–1944
State v. . Best neutral
nc · 1931
2 sentences

1944It was urged that the ruling in S. v. Holbrook, 223 N. C., 622 , and 8. v. Baker, 213 N. C., 524 , 196 S. E., 829 , should be applied here, rather than that set out in S. v. Williams, 219 N. C., 365 , 13 S. E. (2d), 617 ; S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9 , 161 S. E., 535 ; and S. v. Anderson, 162 N. O., 571, 77 S. E., 238 .

1944It was urged that the ruling in S. v. Holbrook, 223 N. C., 622 , and 8. v. Baker, 213 N. C., 524 , 196 S. E., 829 , should be applied here, rather than that set out in S. v. Williams, 219 N. C., 365 , 13 S. E. (2d), 617 ; S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9 , 161 S. E., 535 ; and S. v. Anderson, 162 N. O., 571, 77 S. E., 238 .

11944–1944
State v. Anderson green
nc · 1913
1 sentence

1944It was urged that the ruling in S. v. Holbrook, 223 N. C., 622 , and 8. v. Baker, 213 N. C., 524 , 196 S. E., 829 , should be applied here, rather than that set out in S. v. Williams, 219 N. C., 365 , 13 S. E. (2d), 617 ; S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9 , 161 S. E., 535 ; and S. v. Anderson, 162 N. O., 571, 77 S. E., 238 .

11944–1944
State v. . Williams green
nc · 1941
2 sentences

1944It was urged that the ruling in S. v. Holbrook, 223 N. C., 622 , and 8. v. Baker, 213 N. C., 524 , 196 S. E., 829 , should be applied here, rather than that set out in S. v. Williams, 219 N. C., 365 , 13 S. E. (2d), 617 ; S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9 , 161 S. E., 535 ; and S. v. Anderson, 162 N. O., 571, 77 S. E., 238 .

1944It was urged that the ruling in S. v. Holbrook, 223 N. C., 622 , and 8. v. Baker, 213 N. C., 524 , 196 S. E., 829 , should be applied here, rather than that set out in S. v. Williams, 219 N. C., 365 , 13 S. E. (2d), 617 ; S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9 , 161 S. E., 535 ; and S. v. Anderson, 162 N. O., 571, 77 S. E., 238 .

11944–1944
State v. . Baker green
nc · 1938
2 sentences

1944It was urged that the ruling in S. v. Holbrook, 223 N. C., 622 , and 8. v. Baker, 213 N. C., 524 , 196 S. E., 829 , should be applied here, rather than that set out in S. v. Williams, 219 N. C., 365 , 13 S. E. (2d), 617 ; S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9 , 161 S. E., 535 ; and S. v. Anderson, 162 N. O., 571, 77 S. E., 238 .

1944It was urged that the ruling in S. v. Holbrook, 223 N. C., 622 , and 8. v. Baker, 213 N. C., 524 , 196 S. E., 829 , should be applied here, rather than that set out in S. v. Williams, 219 N. C., 365 , 13 S. E. (2d), 617 ; S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9 , 161 S. E., 535 ; and S. v. Anderson, 162 N. O., 571, 77 S. E., 238 .

11944–1944

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1443 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 29 (1878–2022) CA 15 (1909–2020) MO 10 (1903–2013) TX 9 (1931–2015) IN 8 (1904–2015) OH 8 (1956–2025) PA 7 (2003–2023) NC 6 (1944–2024) OK 6 (1906–1958) ID 5 (1898–1964) WA 5 (1913–2020) FL 5 (1985–2008) VA 4 (1932–1980) CO 4 (1966–2025) NY 4 (1916–1995) MD 4 (1997–2012) MS 4 (1955–1998) TN 3 (1912–2024) NE 2 (1932–1945) IA 2 (1926–1998) CT 2 (1986–2007) KY 2 (1910–1937) WI 2 (1882–1927) AL 2 (2016–2017) MN 2 (1964–1994) LA 2 (1904–2005) NJ 2 (1971–1975)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check