6 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
John's Heating Service v. Lambgreen1 sentence2018Facilities, 107 P.3d 871, 881 (Alaska 2005) (quoting John’s Heating Serv. v. Lamb, 46 P.3d 1024, 1032 (Alaska 2002)). 42 The Lums respond that the superior court did not rule on these arguments and the officers have waived them. | 1 | 1 |
Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilitiesgreen1 sentence2018Facilities, 107 P.3d 871, 881 (Alaska 2005) (quoting John’s Heating Serv. v. Lamb, 46 P.3d 1024, 1032 (Alaska 2002)). 42 The Lums respond that the superior court did not rule on these arguments and the officers have waived them. | 1 | 1 |
Brown Jug, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local 959green1 sentence2014But a trespasser may be liable for nominal damages even if "his presence on the land causes no harm to the land," Brown Jug, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Am., Local 959, 688 P.2d 932, 938 (Alaska 1984) (quoting Restaremznt (See. onp) or Torts § 163 (1965)), thus the viability of Konrad's trespass claim does not depend on the specificity of her damage allegations. 37 . | 1 | 1 |
Parks Hiway Enterprises, LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc.green1 sentence2014Mapco Express, Inc. v. Faulk, 24 P.3d 531, 539 (Alaska 2001) (citing Parks Hiway Enters., L.L.C. v. CEM Leasing, Inc., 995 P.2d 657, 664 (Alaska 2000); Restatement (SEconp) or Torts §§ 158, 163). 38 . | 1 | 1 |
Mapco Express, Inc. v. Faulkgreen1 sentence2014Mapco Express, Inc. v. Faulk, 24 P.3d 531, 539 (Alaska 2001) (citing Parks Hiway Enters., L.L.C. v. CEM Leasing, Inc., 995 P.2d 657, 664 (Alaska 2000); Restatement (SEconp) or Torts §§ 158, 163). 38 . | 1 | 1 |
Shockley v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.green1 sentence2000The other cases Parks Hiway cites — Shockley v. Hoechst Celanese Corp., 793 F.Supp. 670, 674 (D.S.C.1992), Burt v. Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church of Broomfield, 809 P.2d 1064 (Colo.App.1990), and Lever Bros. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Lestenkof
green
1 sentence2018Co. v. Lestenkof , 155 P.3d 313 , 316 (Alaska 2007) ). 4 McElroy v. Kennedy , 74 P.3d 903 , 906 (Alaska 2003). 5 Strong admitted during discovery that he was not bringing a trespass claim against the Municipality, but because the Municipality does not argue on appeal that he waived it, we will address it. 6 Parson v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Alaska Hous. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Crawford v. Kemp
green
1 sentence2018They argue that the invasion of privacy claim is barred because they entered the Lums’ home only in “the orderly performance of [their] duties,” and that the trespass claim is barred because their entry was “privileged.”42 We take these arguments to mean that the officers cannot be held liable under either tort theory because their entry was 40 See id. 41 Hammond v. State, Dep’t of Transp. & Pub. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
McElroy v. Kennedy
green
1 sentence2018Co. v. Lestenkof , 155 P.3d 313 , 316 (Alaska 2007) ). 4 McElroy v. Kennedy , 74 P.3d 903 , 906 (Alaska 2003). 5 Strong admitted during discovery that he was not bringing a trespass claim against the Municipality, but because the Municipality does not argue on appeal that he waived it, we will address it. 6 Parson v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Alaska Hous. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Lee v. Konrad
green
1 sentence2017We have also stated that consent can be “implied from actions or conduct, applicable social conventions, or the relationship between the parties.” Lee, 337 P.3d at 522 . 12 See RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 892 cmt. c. -3- 1622 raise the trespass exception when he appealed the classification to the then-existing Animal Control Appeals Board.13 The board determined that the victim was not committing trespass at the time of the injury. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Burt v. Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church of Broomfield
green
1 sentence2000The other cases Parks Hiway cites — Shockley v. Hoechst Celanese Corp., 793 F.Supp. 670, 674 (D.S.C.1992), Burt v. Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church of Broomfield, 809 P.2d 1064 (Colo.App.1990), and Lever Bros. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
McDowell v. State
green
1 sentence2000We did not consider there “whether contamination resulting from unintentional acts would satisfy the elements of a trespass claim.” Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Wickwire v. City & Borough of Juneau
green
1 sentence1996Although Wickwire asserted a trespass claim, as did Mount Juneau Enterprises in this case, we concluded that the landowner’s only remedy in such a case “is an inverse condemnation action for just compensation for the value of the easement on the date of taking_” Id. at 784 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.