Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1977–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lopez v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.green2 sentences2026See, e.g., Lopez v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc., 343 Conn. 31, 57 , 272 A.3d 150 (2022) (“if the evidence necessary for resolution is undisputed, then this court can decide the issue as a matter of law without need for a remand for factual findings”). 2026See, e.g., Lopez v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc., 343 Conn. 31, 57, 272 A.3d 150 (2022) (“if the evidence necessary for resolution is undisputed, then this court can decide the issue as a matter of law without need for a remand for factual findings”). | 1 | 1 |
Kelly v. Ivlergreen2 sentences1996See Kelly v. Ivler, 187 Conn. 31, 45-47 , 450 A.2d 817 (1982). 1996See Kelly v. Ivler, 187 Conn. 31, 45-47 , 450 A.2d 817 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Raymond Patriarca v. United States of America, Ronald J. Cassesso v. United States of America, Henry Tameleo v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1983In this regard, we agree with the First Circuit Court of Appeals: “[W]e do not consider that a trespass by the defense gives the prosecution a hunting license exempt from ethical restraints on advocacy.” (Footnote omitted.) Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 321 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S. Ct. 633 , 21 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Handler v. Remington Arms Co.
green
2 sentences1977Handler v. Remington Arms Co., 144 Conn. 316, 321 . 1977Handler v. Remington Arms Co., 144 Conn. 316 , 321 . | 2 | 1977–1977 |
Rickel v. Komaromi
green
1 sentence2017When analyzing whether a trespass claim is time barred, "the only facts material to the trial court's decision ... are the date of the wrongful conduct alleged in the complaint and the date the action was filed." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
City of New Haven v. Bonner
green
2 sentences2006“Only in [the] most exceptional circumstances can and will [an appellate] court consider a claim, constitutional or otherwise, that has not been raised and decided in the trial court.” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) New Haven v. Bonner, 272 Conn. 489, 498 , 863 A.2d 680 (2005); see also Practice Book § 60-5. 2006“Only in [the] most exceptional circumstances can and will [an appellate] court consider a claim, constitutional or otherwise, that has not been raised and decided in the trial court.” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) New Haven v. Bonner, 272 Conn. 489, 498 , 863 A.2d 680 (2005); see also Practice Book § 60-5. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Robert v. Scarlata
green
2 sentences2006When a party prevails on a trespass claim, it is “entitled to damages based on the lost use value of the property [trespassed upon] and any harm caused by the trespass during the time of the defendants’ occupation.” Robert v. Scarlata, 96 Conn. App. 19, 24 , 899 A.2d 666 (2006). 2006When a party prevails on a trespass claim, it is “entitled to damages based on the lost use value of the property [trespassed upon] and any harm caused by the trespass during the time of the defendants’ occupation.” Robert v. Scarlata, 96 Conn. App. 19, 24 , 899 A.2d 666 (2006). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Mastroberti v. Hall, No. 058336 (Feb. 18, 1993)
green
1 sentence1995Mastroberti v. Hall , supra, see also, Poulos v. Pfizer Inc. and Pharmchem Laboratories Inc. , supra, In the present case, the basis for the defendant's motion to strike is that an invasion of privacy claim is analogous to a trespass claim involving property rights. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Bass v. Planned Management Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence1994Preliminarily, if the Zanoni's had a right to make a trespass claim because of the nature of their possessory interest the changing of the locks effectively barring them from the cottage would constitute a trespass; Bass v. Planned Management Services , 761 P.2d 566 , 569 (Ut., 1988). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Larkin v. Avery
green
1 sentence1994Also, if the party bringing a trespass claim has the requisite possessory interest, the physical occupation of the property need not be continuous, Bilieu v. Pausley , 21 P. 934 , 937 (Ore., 1889) (seasonal mining); weekend occupancy should be enough to establish the claim, cf Larken v. Avery, et al 23 Conn. 304 , 305 , 310 (1854) where temporary absence held not to defeat trespass claim by one otherwise having a right to make it. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Bileu v. Paisley
green
1 sentence1994Also, if the party bringing a trespass claim has the requisite possessory interest, the physical occupation of the property need not be continuous, Bilieu v. Pausley , 21 P. 934 , 937 (Ore., 1889) (seasonal mining); weekend occupancy should be enough to establish the claim, cf Larken v. Avery, et al 23 Conn. 304 , 305 , 310 (1854) where temporary absence held not to defeat trespass claim by one otherwise having a right to make it. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Pagano v. Martin
green
1 sentence1983In this regard, we agree with the First Circuit Court of Appeals: “[W]e do not consider that a trespass by the defense gives the prosecution a hunting license exempt from ethical restraints on advocacy.” (Footnote omitted.) Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 321 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S. Ct. 633 , 21 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Dawson v. United States
green
1 sentence1983In this regard, we agree with the First Circuit Court of Appeals: “[W]e do not consider that a trespass by the defense gives the prosecution a hunting license exempt from ethical restraints on advocacy.” (Footnote omitted.) Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 321 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S. Ct. 633 , 21 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Clemens v. Central Railroad
green
1 sentence1983In this regard, we agree with the First Circuit Court of Appeals: “[W]e do not consider that a trespass by the defense gives the prosecution a hunting license exempt from ethical restraints on advocacy.” (Footnote omitted.) Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 321 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S. Ct. 633 , 21 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
neutral
1 sentence1983Ed. 2d 567 , reh. denied, 393 U.S. 1124 , 89 S. Ct. 987 , 22 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1983Ed. 2d 567 , reh. denied, 393 U.S. 1124 , 89 S. Ct. 987 , 22 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.