15 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. Rungegreen2 sentences2005Initially, we note that in a trespass claim a plaintiff must prove that "he was in possession of the land and that `the defendant entered the land without right.'" Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. Runge, 717 N.E.2d 216, 227 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (quoting Lever Bros. 2005Initially, we note that in a trespass claim a plaintiff must prove that "he was in possession of the land and that 'the defendant entered the land without right'" Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. Runge, 717 N.E.2d 216, 227 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (quoting Lever Bros. | 3 | 3 |
Aberdeen Apartments v. Cary Campbell Realty Alliance, Inc.green2 sentences2023Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 22A-CT-2815 | July 25, 2023 Page 11 of 16 [18] In addition, this Court has held: It is settled law that “in a trespass claim a plaintiff must prove that he was in possession of the land and that the defendant entered the land without right.” Aberdeen Apts. v. Cary Campbell Realty All., Inc., 820 N.E.2d 158, 164 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (citation and quotation marks omitted), trans. denied. 2016It is settled law that “in a trespass claim a plaintiff must prove that he was in possession of the land and that the defendant entered the land without right.” Aberdeen Apts. v. Cary Campbell Realty All., Inc., 820 N.E.2d 158, 164 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) (citation and quotation marks omitted), trans. denied. | 2 | 2 |
Ahmmad Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Incorporated, Steve Lindgren, Larry Williams, City of Gary, Indiana, Nakon Security, Incorporatedgreen2 sentences2023Even so, this does not show that Captain Hensley, or any other VPD officer was “an operator, a manager, an adult employee, or a security agent employed by a store.” I.C. § 35-31.5-2-12(a). [12] We have held before that “‘a police officer who is neither an owner of a property nor an agent of an owner of a property cannot create a trespass violation by asking a patron to leave and then arrest the patron when [he] refuses to do so.’” Glispie, 955 N.E.2d at 823 (quoting Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Inc., 449 F.3d 751, 763 (7th Cir. 2006) (applying Indiana law)); see also Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police 2011See Hope Lutheran Church, 460 N.E.2d at 1248 . “[A] police officer who is neither an owner of a property nor an agent of an owner of a property cannot create a trespass violation by asking a patron to leave and then arrest the patron when [he] refuses to do so.” Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Inc., 449 F.3d 751, 763 (7th Cir.2006) (opining on the meaning of Indiana law), corrected by, 2006 U.S.App. | 2 | 2 |
Kb Home Indiana Inc. v. Rockville Tbd Corp.green2 sentences2014KB Home Indiana Inc. v. Rockville TBD Corp., 928 N.E.2d 297, 308 (Ind.Ct.App.2010). 2014See KB Home Ind., Inc. v. Rockville TBD Corp., 928 N.E.2d 297, 308 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (plaintiff had no claim for trespass because it did not own the property when the damage occurred). 7 R&M and the Trust assert that they should be allowed to bring a trespass claim against Twin Lakes under the doctrine of fraudulent concealment. | 2 | 2 |
Dennis Samples v. Steve Wilson and Donald & Ingrid Bannon, husband and wife, and Ronald & Edna Bannon, husband and wifegreen1 sentence2025A plaintiff successfully establishes a trespass claim by proof of two elements: (1) “that he possessed the land when the alleged trespass occurred[;]” and (2) “that the trespassing defendant entered the land without a legal right to do so.” Samples v. Wilson, 12 N.E.3d 946, 950 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police Departmentgreen1 sentence2023Even so, this does not show that Captain Hensley, or any other VPD officer was “an operator, a manager, an adult employee, or a security agent employed by a store.” I.C. § 35-31.5-2-12(a). [12] We have held before that “‘a police officer who is neither an owner of a property nor an agent of an owner of a property cannot create a trespass violation by asking a patron to leave and then arrest the patron when [he] refuses to do so.’” Glispie, 955 N.E.2d at 823 (quoting Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Inc., 449 F.3d 751, 763 (7th Cir. 2006) (applying Indiana law)); see also Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police | 1 | 1 |
Bragg v. Stategreen1 sentence2020See Ali, 53 N.E.3d at 434 . [20] Accordingly, if Williams were to have a trespass claim, it would run against Porter County Animal Control, not Guzman. | 1 | 1 |
Ehler v. LVDVD, L.C.green1 sentence2019See Ehler v. LVDVD, L.C. , 319 S.W.3d 817 , 824 (Tex. Ct. App. 2010) ("Permitting the [plaintiffs] to avoid the application of [the Texas RTFA] by pleading a nuisance action as a trespass would eviscerate the statute and deny [the defendants] the protection intended by the Legislature when it passed the Right to Farm Act."). | 1 | 1 |
Jennifer L. Frink v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2016See Frink v. State, 2016 WL 1158614 *3 (Ind. Ct. App. Mar. 24, 2016) (concluding the lack of contractual interest was “reasonably apparent” under the circumstances where defendant had been informed numerous times that she was not to be on school property and reminded of the trespass warning). [15] Bozzo also argues that the State failed to prove that Officer Dunning, who issued the written trespass warning, and Officer Evans, who arrested him for trespass, were agents of IU. | 1 | 1 |
Hope Lutheran Church v. Chellewgreen1 sentence2011See Hope Lutheran Church, 460 N.E.2d at 1248 . “[A] police officer who is neither an owner of a property nor an agent of an owner of a property cannot create a trespass violation by asking a patron to leave and then arrest the patron when [he] refuses to do so.” Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Inc., 449 F.3d 751, 763 (7th Cir.2006) (opining on the meaning of Indiana law), corrected by, 2006 U.S.App. | 1 | 1 |
Lever Bros. Co. v. Langdocgreen2 sentences2005Co. v. Langdoc, 655 N.E.2d 577, 581-82 (Ind.Ct.App.1995)). 2005Co. v. Langdoc, 655 N.E.2d 577, 581-82 (Ind.Ct.App.1995)). | 1 | 1 |
Harvest Life Insurance v. Getchegreen1 sentence1999See Getche, 701 N.E.2d at 874 (“Where material facts conflict, or undisputed facts lead to conflicting material inferences, summary judgment is inappropriate .... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Glispie v. State
green
2 sentences2023Even so, this does not show that Captain Hensley, or any other VPD officer was “an operator, a manager, an adult employee, or a security agent employed by a store.” I.C. § 35-31.5-2-12(a). [12] We have held before that “‘a police officer who is neither an owner of a property nor an agent of an owner of a property cannot create a trespass violation by asking a patron to leave and then arrest the patron when [he] refuses to do so.’” Glispie, 955 N.E.2d at 823 (quoting Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Inc., 449 F.3d 751, 763 (7th Cir. 2006) (applying Indiana law)); see also Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police 2015We concluded that an officer, “if neither an owner nor an agent of the owner, cannot create a trespass violation by denying a person entry to private property and later discovering that person again on the property.” Id. at 823 . | 3 | 2015–2023 |
Havert v. Caldwell
green
1 sentence1994That being the case, we are inclined to agree with Ritz that, despite our duty to affirm on any theory or legal basis found in the record, Havert v. Caldwell (1983), Ind., 452 N.E.2d 154 , on the issues litigated, a genuine issue of material fact remains as to whether PSI trespassed upon that portion of Ritz' property which is not burdened by a right-of-way. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.