Brown motion in Arkansas

2022Brown’s claim––that the video introduced at trial was altered to conceal exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)––fails to state sufficient facts that would merit relief.

2022Key v. State, 2019 Ark. 202 , 575 S.W.3d 554 .

2022Key v. State, 2019 Ark. 202 , 575 S.W.3d 554 .

2022McKinney v. State, 2021 Ark. 210 .

2014Brown’s issue on appeal clearly relates 1 Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-90-120(a) provides: Any person convicted of any offense that is classified by the laws of this state as a felony who employed any firearm of any character as a means of committing or escaping from the felony, in the discretion of the sentencing court, may be subjected to an additional period of confinement in the state penitentiary for a period not to exceed fifteen (15) years. 2 Cite as 2014 Ark.

2009My review of the circuit court's order granting Rule 37 relief reveals that the circuit court's ruling in this matter complied with the requirements of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1994), in that the circuit court found that defense counsel's performance was deficient and that defense counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Brown's defense: The previously-asked questions then must be addressed: Was defense counsel's performance deficient; and, was the deficiency such that the Defendant's rights were prejudiced? ....

2009My review of the circuit court's order granting Rule 37 relief reveals that the circuit court's ruling in this matter complied with the requirements of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1994), in that the circuit court found that defense counsel's performance was deficient and that defense counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Brown's defense: The previously-asked questions then must be addressed: Was defense counsel's performance deficient; and, was the deficiency such that the Defendant's rights were prejudiced? ....

1998We affirmed the denial of Brown’s motion to transfer his case to juvenile court in Brown v. State, 330 Ark. 518 , 954 S.W.2d 276 (1997).

1998We affirmed the denial of Brown’s motion to transfer his case to juvenile court in Brown v. State, 330 Ark. 518 , 954 S.W.2d 276 (1997).

1987Williams v. State, 272 Ark. 98 , 612 S.W.2d 115 (1981).

1987Williams v. State, 272 Ark. 98 , 612 S.W.2d 115 (1981).

1976Conley v. State, 180 Ark. 278 , 21 S.W.2d 176 ." We find nothing in the record that would indicate that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant the appellant Brown's motion for severance or continuance.

1976Conley v. State, 180 Ark. 278 , 21 S.W. 2d 176 .” We find nothing in the record that would indicate that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant the appellant Brown’s motion for severance or continuance.

1976Conley v. State, 180 Ark. 278 , 21 S.W.2d 176 ." We find nothing in the record that would indicate that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant the appellant Brown's motion for severance or continuance.

1976Conley v. State, 180 Ark. 278 , 21 S.W. 2d 176 .” We find nothing in the record that would indicate that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant the appellant Brown’s motion for severance or continuance.