Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Allengreen2 sentences2023Id. ¶28 While “a defendant charged under a repeater statute has the right to have all evidence of any prior conviction kept from the jury trying the instant offense,” see Mulkovich v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 464, 468 , 243 N.W.2d 198 (1976), we conclude that Brown’s claim does not allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that he is entitled to relief, see Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9 . 2012See id. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Camerongreen2 sentences2023See State v. Cameron, 2016 WI App 54, ¶27 , 370 Wis. 2d 661 , 885 N.W.2d 611 (“It is not deficient performance for counsel not to make a pointless objection.”). 2023See State v. Cameron, 2016 WI App 54, ¶27 , 370 Wis. 2d 661 , 885 N.W.2d 611 (“It is not deficient performance for counsel not to make a pointless objection.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Theophilous Ruffingreen1 sentence2023See Ruffin, 401 Wis. 2d 619, ¶35 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Harborgreen2 sentences2020See State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶35 , 333 Wis. 2d 53 , 797 N.W.2d 828 . 2020See State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶35 , 333 Wis. 2d 53 , 797 N.W.2d 828 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bangertgreen2 sentences2016The State argues that the proper remedy in the instant case and others like it is reduction (commutation) of the sentence to the potential punishment the defendant was told he could receive.17 In the instant case, the State argues the 16 See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶6 ("If the State cannot prove by clear and convincing evidence that Brown understood the nature of the charges and the constitutional rights he gave up, the circuit court shall grant Brown's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas."); Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 274 ("Whenever the Section 971.08 procedure is not undertaken or whenever the 2016See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶ 6 ("If the State cannot prove by clear and convincing evidence that Brown understood the nature of the charges and the constitutional rights he gave up, the circuit court shall grant Brown's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas."); Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 274 ("Whenever the Section 971.08 procedure is not undertaken or whenever the court-mandated duties are not fulfilled at the plea hearing, the defendant may move to withdraw his plea."). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Browngreen2 sentences2016The State argues that the proper remedy in the instant case and others like it is reduction (commutation) of the sentence to the potential punishment the defendant was told he could receive.17 In the instant case, the State argues the 16 See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶6 ("If the State cannot prove by clear and convincing evidence that Brown understood the nature of the charges and the constitutional rights he gave up, the circuit court shall grant Brown's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas."); Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 274 ("Whenever the Section 971.08 procedure is not undertaken or whenever the 2016See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶ 6 ("If the State cannot prove by clear and convincing evidence that Brown understood the nature of the charges and the constitutional rights he gave up, the circuit court shall grant Brown's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas."); Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 274 ("Whenever the Section 971.08 procedure is not undertaken or whenever the court-mandated duties are not fulfilled at the plea hearing, the defendant may move to withdraw his plea."). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Andre M. Chamblisgreen2 sentences2016See State v. Chamblis, 2015 WI 53, ¶¶54-55 , 362 Wis. 2d 370 , 864 N.W.2d 806 . (continued) 11 No. 2014AP2488-CR circuit court correctly reduced Finley's sentence from the maximum statutory penalty, 23 years, 6 months' imprisonment,* to 19 years, 6 months' imprisonment* (even though during the plea colloquy the circuit court advised Finley that he was subject to 19 years, 6 months' confinement in prison*). ¶20 Upon consideration of Bangert, Brown, Cross, and Taylor, for the reasons set forth we conclude that under the In State v. Chamblis, the defendant was advised of the correct potential pun 2016See State v. Chamblis, 2015 WI 53, ¶¶54-55 , 362 Wis. 2d 370 , 864 N.W.2d 806 . (continued) 11 No. 2014AP2488-CR circuit court correctly reduced Finley's sentence from the maximum statutory penalty, 23 years, 6 months' imprisonment,* to 19 years, 6 months' imprisonment* (even though during the plea colloquy the circuit court advised Finley that he was subject to 19 years, 6 months' confinement in prison*). ¶20 Upon consideration of Bangert, Brown, Cross, and Taylor, for the reasons set forth we conclude that under the In State v. Chamblis, the defendant was advised of the correct potential pun | 1 | 1 |
New York v. Harrisgreen2 sentences2012See id. at 19-20 . 2012See id. at 19-20 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Thomasgreen2 sentences1995Several jurisdictions have held confrontations may constitute intervening circumstances under the Brown analysis. " 'A defendant's confrontation with untainted evidence, which induces in the defendant a voluntary desire to confess, may be a legitimate intervening circumstance' to dissipate the taint of the defendant's earlier illegal arrest." People v. Thomas, 542 N.E.2d 881, 888 (Ill. 1995Several jurisdictions have held confrontations may constitute intervening circumstances under the Brown analysis. " 'A defendant's confrontation with untainted evidence, which induces in the defendant a voluntary desire to confess, may be a legitimate intervening circumstance' to dissipate the taint of the defendant's earlier illegal arrest." People v. Thomas, 542 N.E.2d 881, 888 (Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Whitegreen2 sentences1995App. 1989) (quoting People v. White, 512 N.E.2d 677, 689 (Ill. 1987)). 3 In Thomas , the defendant made incriminating statements after hearing a tape recording of his co-defendant's incriminating statement. 1995App. 1989) (quoting People v. White, 512 N.E.2d 677, 689 (Ill. 1987)). 3 In Thomas , the defendant made incriminating statements after hearing a tape recording of his co-defendant's incriminating statement. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Anderson
green
2 sentences2012The court of appeals also noted that after Harris was decided, this court applied the Brown analysis in State v. Anderson, 165 Wis. 2d 441 , 477 N.W.2d 277 (1991), and State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180 , 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998), involving the suppression of evidence obtained following a warrantless home entry and search. 2012The court of appeals also noted that after Harris was decided, this court applied the Brown analysis in State v. Anderson, 165 Wis. 2d 441 , 477 N.W.2d 277 (1991), and State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180 , 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998), involving the suppression of evidence obtained following a warrantless home entry and search. | 2 | 2010–2012 |
Mulkovich v. State
green
2 sentences2023Id. ¶28 While “a defendant charged under a repeater statute has the right to have all evidence of any prior conviction kept from the jury trying the instant offense,” see Mulkovich v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 464, 468 , 243 N.W.2d 198 (1976), we conclude that Brown’s claim does not allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that he is entitled to relief, see Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9 . 2023Id. ¶28 While “a defendant charged under a repeater statute has the right to have all evidence of any prior conviction kept from the jury trying the instant offense,” see Mulkovich v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 464, 468 , 243 N.W.2d 198 (1976), we conclude that Brown’s claim does not allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that he is entitled to relief, see Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. George E. Savage
green
1 sentence2022Id. ¶20 On appeal, Brown raises the same three ineffective assistance of counsel claims that he raised before the circuit court: (1) Brown’s trial counsel misinformed Brown regarding his SAP eligibility; (2) counsel failed to advise Brown that Count 3 was ineligible for SAP; and (3) counsel failed to inform 9 No. 2021AP878-CR Brown that he could have withdrawn his pleas prior to being sentenced.9 For the reasons that follow, we affirm the court’s conclusion that Brown’s trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective. ¶21 Brown first alleges that he was “affirmatively misled when trial coun | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Minerva Lopez
green
2 sentences2022State v. Lopez, 2014 WI 11, ¶61 , 353 Wis. 2d 1 , 843 N.W.2d 390 (citation omitted). 2022State v. Lopez, 2014 WI 11, ¶61 , 353 Wis. 2d 1 , 843 N.W.2d 390 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Sigarroa
green
2 sentences2020Accordingly, we review only the circuit court’s decision denying Brown’s motion for a mistrial. ¶8 “The decision whether to grant a mistrial lies within the sound discretion of the [circuit] court.” State v. Sigarroa, 2004 WI App 16, ¶24 , 269 Wis. 2d 234 , 674 N.W.2d 894 (2003). 2020Accordingly, we review only the circuit court’s decision denying Brown’s motion for a mistrial. ¶8 “The decision whether to grant a mistrial lies within the sound discretion of the [circuit] court.” State v. Sigarroa, 2004 WI App 16, ¶24 , 269 Wis. 2d 234 , 674 N.W.2d 894 (2003). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Mainiero
green
2 sentences2018However, the prior consistent statement " 'must predate the alleged recent fabrication or improper influence or motive before [it has] probative value.' " State v. Mainiero , 189 Wis. 2d 80 , 103, 525 N.W.2d 304 (Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). 2018However, the prior consistent statement " 'must predate the alleged recent fabrication or improper influence or motive before [it has] probative value.' " State v. Mainiero , 189 Wis. 2d 80 , 103, 525 N.W.2d 304 (Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Brown
neutral
2 sentences2014It concluded that "[a] tail lamp with one of three light bulbs unlit does not violate Wis. Stat. § 347.13 (1) when it otherwise meets the statutory definition of a tail lamp." State v. Brown, 2013 WI App 17, ¶21 , 346 Wis. 2d 98 , 827 N.W.2d 903 . 2014It concluded that "[a] tail lamp with one of three light bulbs unlit does not violate Wis. Stat. § 347.13 (1) when it otherwise meets the statutory definition of a tail lamp." State v. Brown, 2013 WI App 17, ¶21 , 346 Wis. 2d 98 , 827 N.W.2d 903 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Cross
green
2 sentences2014The court of appeals relied on State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70 , 326 Wis. 2d 492 , 786 N.W.2d 64 (wherein the circuit court gave Cross mistaken information about the crime to which he pled); State v. Woods, 173 Wis. 2d 129 , 496 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1992) (wherein the court erred by imposing a sentence to run consecutive to a juvenile disposition that Woods was then serving); State v. Brown, 2004 WI App 179 , 276 Wis. 2d 559 , 687 N.W.2d 543 (wherein the court erred by stating that Brown's plea did not trigger sex offender registration or Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment potential). 2014The court of appeals relied on State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70 , 326 Wis. 2d 492 , 786 N.W.2d 64 (wherein the circuit court gave Cross mistaken information about the crime to which he pled); State v. Woods, 173 Wis. 2d 129 , 496 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1992) (wherein the court erred by imposing a sentence to run consecutive to a juvenile disposition that Woods was then serving); State v. Brown, 2004 WI App 179 , 276 Wis. 2d 559 , 687 N.W.2d 543 (wherein the court erred by stating that Brown's plea did not trigger sex offender registration or Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment potential). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Brown
green
2 sentences2014The court of appeals relied on State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70 , 326 Wis. 2d 492 , 786 N.W.2d 64 (wherein the circuit court gave Cross mistaken information about the crime to which he pled); State v. Woods, 173 Wis. 2d 129 , 496 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1992) (wherein the court erred by imposing a sentence to run consecutive to a juvenile disposition that Woods was then serving); State v. Brown, 2004 WI App 179 , 276 Wis. 2d 559 , 687 N.W.2d 543 (wherein the court erred by stating that Brown's plea did not trigger sex offender registration or Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment potential). 2014The court of appeals relied on State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70 , 326 Wis. 2d 492 , 786 N.W.2d 64 (wherein the circuit court gave Cross mistaken information about the crime to which he pled); State v. Woods, 173 Wis. 2d 129 , 496 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1992) (wherein the court erred by imposing a sentence to run consecutive to a juvenile disposition that Woods was then serving); State v. Brown, 2004 WI App 179 , 276 Wis. 2d 559 , 687 N.W.2d 543 (wherein the court erred by stating that Brown's plea did not trigger sex offender registration or Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment potential). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Woods
green
2 sentences2014The court of appeals relied on State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70 , 326 Wis. 2d 492 , 786 N.W.2d 64 (wherein the circuit court gave Cross mistaken information about the crime to which he pled); State v. Woods, 173 Wis. 2d 129 , 496 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1992) (wherein the court erred by imposing a sentence to run consecutive to a juvenile disposition that Woods was then serving); State v. Brown, 2004 WI App 179 , 276 Wis. 2d 559 , 687 N.W.2d 543 (wherein the court erred by stating that Brown's plea did not trigger sex offender registration or Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment potential). 2014The court of appeals relied on State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70 , 326 Wis. 2d 492 , 786 N.W.2d 64 (wherein the circuit court gave Cross mistaken information about the crime to which he pled); State v. Woods, 173 Wis. 2d 129 , 496 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1992) (wherein the court erred by imposing a sentence to run consecutive to a juvenile disposition that Woods was then serving); State v. Brown, 2004 WI App 179 , 276 Wis. 2d 559 , 687 N.W.2d 543 (wherein the court erred by stating that Brown's plea did not trigger sex offender registration or Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment potential). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Laasch v. State
green
2 sentences2012According to Felix, applying a Brown analysis in this case is consistent with this court's decisions in Laasch, 84 Wis. 2d 587 , Smith, 131 Wis. 2d 220 , and Walker, 154 Wis. 2d 158 , which predate Harris. 2012According to Felix, applying a Brown analysis in this case is consistent with this court's decisions in Laasch, 84 Wis. 2d 587 , Smith, 131 Wis. 2d 220 , and Walker, 154 Wis. 2d 158 , which predate Harris. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Edwards v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2012Additionally, as the Supreme Court noted in Harris , evidence will still be suppressed if it was "the product of coercion, if Miranda warnings were not given, or if there was a violation of the rule of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981)." Id. at 20. 2012Additionally, as the Supreme Court noted in Harris , evidence will still be suppressed if it was "the product of coercion, if Miranda warnings were not given, or if there was a violation of the rule of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981)." Id. at 20. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Eason
green
2 sentences2012Felix asserts that this court should conclude, as it did in Eason, 245 Wis. 2d 206 , that this is a situation in which the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fourth Amendment does not protect a defendant's Article I, Section 11 rights. 2012Felix asserts that this court should conclude, as it did in Eason, 245 Wis. 2d 206 , that this is a situation in which the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fourth Amendment does not protect a defendant's Article I, Section 11 rights. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2012According to Felix, applying a Brown analysis in this case is consistent with this court's decisions in Laasch, 84 Wis. 2d 587 , Smith, 131 Wis. 2d 220 , and Walker, 154 Wis. 2d 158 , which predate Harris. 2012According to Felix, applying a Brown analysis in this case is consistent with this court's decisions in Laasch, 84 Wis. 2d 587 , Smith, 131 Wis. 2d 220 , and Walker, 154 Wis. 2d 158 , which predate Harris. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Walker
green
2 sentences2012According to Felix, applying a Brown analysis in this case is consistent with this court's decisions in Laasch, 84 Wis. 2d 587 , Smith, 131 Wis. 2d 220 , and Walker, 154 Wis. 2d 158 , which predate Harris. 2012According to Felix, applying a Brown analysis in this case is consistent with this court's decisions in Laasch, 84 Wis. 2d 587 , Smith, 131 Wis. 2d 220 , and Walker, 154 Wis. 2d 158 , which predate Harris. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Phillips
green
2 sentences2012The court of appeals also noted that after Harris was decided, this court applied the Brown analysis in State v. Anderson, 165 Wis. 2d 441 , 477 N.W.2d 277 (1991), and State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180 , 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998), involving the suppression of evidence obtained following a warrantless home entry and search. 2012The court of appeals also noted that after Harris was decided, this court applied the Brown analysis in State v. Anderson, 165 Wis. 2d 441 , 477 N.W.2d 277 (1991), and State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180 , 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998), involving the suppression of evidence obtained following a warrantless home entry and search. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Brown v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 . ¶ 67 Although Brown specifically addressed a confession made after an illegal arrest, this court has applied the Brown factors to the context of an illegal search. 2010Id. at 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 . ¶ 67 Although Brown specifically addressed a confession made after an illegal arrest, this court has applied the Brown factors to the context of an illegal search. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Brown v. Hammermill Paper Co.
green
2 sentences1987Id. at 232-33 , 276 N.W.2d at 712-13 . 1987Id. at 232-33 , 276 N.W.2d at 712-13 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.