6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Maricopa Countygreen1 sentence2024In analyzing whether someone present in Arizona without lawful authority could qualify for indigent medical treatment, the Court noted that to qualify, “the patient [had to] be indigent and ‘a resident of the county for the preceding twelve months.’” Id. at 98 (emphasis added) (quoting A.R.S. 11-297(A) (1973)). 8 Thus, the need to establish domicile, let alone the legal 8 The Court noted that the Supreme Court had previously held the durational aspect of the residency requirement unconstitutional in Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County, 415 U.S. 250 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas P. Morrissey v. Logan Stan Garnergreen1 sentence2020See Morrissey v. Garner, 461 P.3d 428 (Ariz. 2020). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Triano v. Massion
green
2 sentences2022The court concluded that Triano's construction of the residency provision as requiring only that a candidate be a resident of the Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-22-0110-EL/AP Page 5 of 6 ward for any one-year period prior to becoming a candidate would constitute “an unreasonable and constrained construction” of the charter provision. 109 Ariz. at 510 , 513 P.2d at 939 . 2022The court concluded that Triano's construction of the residency provision as requiring only that a candidate be a resident of the Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-22-0110-EL/AP Page 5 of 6 ward for any one-year period prior to becoming a candidate would constitute “an unreasonable and constrained construction” of the charter provision. 109 Ariz. at 510 , 513 P.2d at 939 . | 2 | 1984–2022 |
Arizona Board of Regents v. Harper
green
2 sentences2006Id. 2006Id. | 2 | 1972–2006 |
Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County
green
1 sentence2024In analyzing whether someone present in Arizona without lawful authority could qualify for indigent medical treatment, the Court noted that to qualify, “the patient [had to] be indigent and ‘a resident of the county for the preceding twelve months.’” Id. at 98 (emphasis added) (quoting A.R.S. 11-297(A) (1973)). 8 Thus, the need to establish domicile, let alone the legal 8 The Court noted that the Supreme Court had previously held the durational aspect of the residency requirement unconstitutional in Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County, 415 U.S. 250 (1974). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Shapiro v. Thompson
green
2 sentences1972A.R.S. § 11-297 provides: “A. Except in emergency cases when immediate hospitalization or medical care is necessary for the preservation of life or limb no person shall be provided hospitalization, medical care or outpatient relief * * * without first filing * * * a statement * * * that he is an indigent * * * and that he has -been a resident of the county for the preceding twelve months.” The principal case relied upon by Respondents is that of Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969). 1972A.R.S. § 11-297 provides: “A. Except in emergency cases when immediate hospitalization or medical care is necessary for the preservation of life or limb no person shall be provided hospitalization, medical care or outpatient relief * * * without first filing * * * a statement * * * that he is an indigent * * * and that he has -been a resident of the county for the preceding twelve months.” The principal case relied upon by Respondents is that of Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.