residency requirement (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

residency requirement in Mississippi

13 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Edwards v. Stevensgreen
miss · 2007 · cited in 4 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2012–2023
2 sentences

2023“It is the candidate’s burden to prove that she meets the residency requirement.” Westbrooks, 99 So. 3d at 133 (citing Edwards v. Stevens, 963 So. 2d 1108, 1110 (Miss. 2007)).

2015“It is the candidate’s burden to prove that [he] meets the residency requirement.” Bryant v. Westbrooks, 99 So.3d 128, 133 (¶ 14) (Miss.2012) (citing Edwards v. Stevens, 963 So.2d 1108, 1110 (¶ 11) (Miss.2007)). ¶ 39.

44
Bryant v. Westbrooksgreen
miss · 2012 · cited in 4 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2015–2023
2 sentences

2023“It is the candidate’s burden to prove that she meets the residency requirement.” Westbrooks, 99 So. 3d at 133 (citing Edwards v. Stevens, 963 So. 2d 1108, 1110 (Miss. 2007)).

2017In Bryant v. Westbrooks , 99 So.3d 128 , 134 (¶ 17) (Miss. 2012), the Court explained: "While the existence of a residency requirement was a question of law suitable for summary review by a circuit judge, the question of whether a candidate meets the residency requirement clearly involves questions of fact." The remainder of Bryant's appeal is based on the circuit court's factual finding that Dickerson was a resident of Sunflower County and such factual finding is not subject to the Court's review pursuant to Section 23-15-933 CONCLUSION ¶ 11.

24
Grist v. Faresegreen
miss · 2003 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012Edwards v. Stevens, 963 So.2d 1108, 1110 (Miss.2007); see also Grist v. Farese, 860 So.2d 1182, 1187 (Miss.2003). ¶ 15.

11
Young v. Stevensgreen
miss · 2007 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012We have said that “[t]he determination of a person’s ‘permanent home and principal establishment’ turns on actual proof of a person’s living arrangements.” Young, 968 So.2d at 1264 (emphasis added).

2012Young, 968 So.2d at 1260 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Hinds County Election Com'n v. Brinston green
miss · 1996
2 sentences

2004The [petitioner's] cite Hinds County Election Commission v. Brinston, 671 So.2d 667 (Miss.1996), where the residency requirement in the circuit clerk’s election was considered and decided before the election.

2003The Fareses cite Hinds County Election Commission v. Brinston, 671 So.2d 667 (Miss.1996), where the residency requirement in the circuit clerk's election was considered and decided before the election.

42003–2004
Foster v. Harden green
miss · 1988
2 sentences

1997Foster, 536 So.2d at 907 .

1995Foster, 536 So. 2d at 907 .

21995–1997
Steve Hale v. Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee green
miss · 2015
2 sentences

2022Cf. Hale, 168 So. 3d at 946 . ¶33.

2022Id.

12022–2022
In re Jackson green
mich · 1867
1 sentence

1976NOTES [1] This case involved a decree before the 1971 amendment to Section 29, Title 34 Alabama Code of 1940 which reduced the residency requirement from one year to six months. [2] Calhoun was decided before the 1971 amendment to Section 29, Title 34, Alabama Code of 1940. [3] In re Jackson, 15 Mich. 417 (1867).

11976–1976

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (8) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-961 (6) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 27-33-19 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 87 (1974–2025) IL 43 (1977–2026) PA 43 (1968–2026) TX 39 (1975–2024) MI 39 (1968–2025) CA 38 (1970–2026) OH 37 (1975–2025) FL 31 (1966–2025) NJ 27 (1970–2021) AL 19 (1974–2026) CT 17 (1979–2024) MN 15 (1971–2016) AR 15 (1981–2024) WA 14 (1974–2025) MS 13 (1976–2023) MA 13 (1971–2020) AK 12 (1973–2024) WI 12 (1976–2016) IA 12 (1982–2024) WV 10 (1979–2019) MO 10 (1976–2020) MD 10 (1967–2026) GA 10 (1978–2025) RI 9 (1990–2023) IN 9 (1986–2025) KY 8 (2002–2025) TN 7 (1991–2019) LA 7 (1975–2025) CO 6 (1983–2025) VT 6 (1971–2016) OK 6 (1977–2015) NC 5 (1984–2025) NV 5 (1978–2022) ME 5 (1980–2026) AZ 5 (1972–2024) HI 4 (1972–2012) ID 4 (1972–2005) NE 4 (1982–2021) DE 4 (2001–2023) VI 3 (1987–2017) SD 3 (1978–2005) KS 3 (1978–1992) NM 2 (1990–2015) UT 2 (2016–2021) DC 2 (1993–2024) OR 2 (2001–2022) ND 2 (1974–2020) NH 2 (1993–2014) VA 2 (1972–2023) WY 2 (1994–1997)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check