12 Wisconsin opinions name it 3 courts 1976–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Van Gilder v. City of Madisongreen1 sentence2015See Van Gilder, 222 Wis. at 80 . (3) Conclusion. ¶ 35. | 1 | 1 |
Dunn v. Blumsteingreen2 sentences2005See id. (upholding a residency requirement necessary to obtaining free public education); Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 343-44 (1972) (concluding that states may require "that voters be bona fide residents of the relevant political subdivision [s]" in order to be entitled to vote). 2005See id. (upholding a residency requirement necessary to obtaining free public education); Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 343-44 (1972) (concluding that states may require "that voters be bona fide residents of the relevant political subdivision[s]" in order to be entitled to vote). | 1 | 1 |
Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. Bynumgreen2 sentences2005See id. (upholding a residency requirement necessary to obtaining free public education); Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 343-44 (1972) (concluding that states may require "that voters be bona fide residents of the relevant political subdivision [s]" in order to be entitled to vote). 2005See id. (upholding a residency requirement necessary to obtaining free public education); Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 343-44 (1972) (concluding that states may require "that voters be bona fide residents of the relevant political subdivision[s]" in order to be entitled to vote). | 1 | 1 |
Robert Hameetman, Cross-Appellee v. The City of Chicago, Cross-Appellantsgreen1 sentence2003Hameetman v. City of Chicago, 776 F.2d 636, 643 (7th Cir. 1985) (refusing to invalidate a residency requirement merely because it might have the incidental and unintended effect of inducing family members to live apart). | 1 | 1 |
Opinion No. Oag 45-83, (1983)green2 sentences1991That terminology means that the sheriff may remove such an undersheriff or deputy for any reason except an unlawful reason. 72 Op. Att'y Gen. 161, 166 (1983). 1 In addition, an undersheriff or deputy sheriff who violates a residency requirement contained in section 59.21 (1) may also be removed from office in a quo warranto action commenced by an affected citizen or by the attorney general pursuant to chapter 784. 1991That terminology means that the sheriff may remove such an undersheriff or deputy for any reason except an unlawful reason. 72 Op. Att'y Gen. 161, 166 (1983). 1 In addition, an undersheriff or deputy sheriff who violates a residency requirement contained in section 59.21 (1) may also be removed from office in a quo warranto action commenced by an affected citizen or by the attorney general pursuant to chapter 784. | 1 | 1 |
Henning v. Village of Waterfordgreen2 sentences1991See, e.g, Henning v. Waterford , 78 Wis.2d 181 , 253 N.W.2d 893 (1977). 1991See, e.g, Henning v. Waterford , 78 Wis.2d 181 , 253 N.W.2d 893 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa Countygreen2 sentences1988Id., 415 U.S. at 259, 262 . 1988Id., 415 U.S. at 259, 262 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission v. Teamsters Local No. 563
green
2 sentences1980In WERC v. Teamsters Local No. 563, 75 Wis.2d 602, 613 , 250 N.W.2d 696 (1977), in rejecting a union’s argument that an ordinance imposing a residency requirement upon city employees must be accommodated with the “legislative enactment” adopting the contract between the union and the city, this court pointed out: “. . . the residency requirement was part of an ordinance, whereas the adoption of the contract was by motion — ‘A resolution ordinarily denotes something less solemn or formal than, or not arising to the dignity of, an ordinance.’ 5 McQuillin, The Law of Municipal Corporations, (3d e 1980In WERC v. Teamsters Local No. 563, 75 Wis.2d 602, 613 , 250 N.W.2d 696 (1977), in rejecting a union’s argument that an ordinance imposing a residency requirement upon city employees must be accommodated with the “legislative enactment” adopting the contract between the union and the city, this court pointed out: “. . . the residency requirement was part of an ordinance, whereas the adoption of the contract was by motion — ‘A resolution ordinarily denotes something less solemn or formal than, or not arising to the dignity of, an ordinance.’ 5 McQuillin, The Law of Municipal Corporations, (3d e | 2 | 1980–1988 |
Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder
green
1 sentence2016Thompson thus concluded that "[t]he state could hardly be held to have violated the uniformity requirement in such a situation." Id. ¶112 Granting municipalities power is distinguishable from the elimination of Milwaukee's residency requirement under Wis. Stat § 66.0502. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 45,581 Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc. v. Joseph Leean
green
2 sentences2004The County relies heavily on the analysis in Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc. v. Leean, 122 F.3d 443 (7th Cir. 1997), appeal after remand, 154 F.3d 716 , to support its argument. 2004Bethesda Lutheran, 122 F.3d at 444 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc. v. Joseph Leean
green
1 sentence2004The County relies heavily on the analysis in Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc. v. Leean, 122 F.3d 443 (7th Cir. 1997), appeal after remand, 154 F.3d 716 , to support its argument. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
green
1 sentence2003In the alternative, Klatt argues that her case comes under Nottelson, 94 Wis. 2d at 124-25 , and contends that she raised a "meritorious justification," that being her constitutional right to marriage and family, for her decision to move in violation of the residency requirement and, as a result, her conduct cannot be considered inconsistent with the. continuation of the employer-employee relationship. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Cardenas v. Fire & Police Commission of Milwaukee
neutral
1 sentence2003Cardenas, 167 F. Supp. 2d at 1066 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
City of Manitowoc v. Manitowoc Police Department
green
2 sentences1997The Association "denied the inclusion of the city regulation in the agreement." The arbitrator's award provided that "police officers shall not be required to live within the City of Manitowoc." Id. at 1011 , 236 N.W.2d at 235 . 1997The Association "denied the inclusion of the city regulation in the agreement." The arbitrator's award provided that "police officers shall not be required to live within the City of Manitowoc." Id. at 1011 , 236 N.W.2d at 235 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
City of Madison v. Local 311, International Ass'n of Firefighters
green
2 sentences1988In City of Madison v. Local 311, International Association of Firefighters, 133 Wis. 2d 186 , 394 N.W.2d 766 (Ct. App. 1986), a case which is the predecessor of the case at bar, the Madison Firefighters’ "me too” clause was at issue. 3 In that case, the Firefighters filed a grievance, claiming that the city, by making an exemption for the bus system employees *583 who had been employed before October 31, 1983, had waived the residency requirement for another group. 1988In City of Madison v. Local 311, International Association of Firefighters, 133 Wis. 2d 186 , 394 N.W.2d 766 (Ct. App. 1986), a case which is the predecessor of the case at bar, the Madison Firefighters’ "me too” clause was at issue. 3 In that case, the Firefighters filed a grievance, claiming that the city, by making an exemption for the bus system employees *583 who had been employed before October 31, 1983, had waived the residency requirement for another group. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Donald H. GONSALVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR TRACTOR COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee
green
1 sentence1983The residency requirement challenged in Ciechone v. City of Chicago, 634 F.2d 1065 (7th Cir. 1980), was not explicit. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State ex rel. La Follette v. Kohlee
green
1 sentence1976La Follette v. Kohler (1930), 200 Wis. 518 , 553 , 228 N.W. 895 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Olson v. Cunningham
green
1 sentence1976La Follette v. Kohler (1930), 200 Wis. 518 , 553 , 228 N.W. 895 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.