Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
MacDonald v. Stategreen1 sentence2020July 25, 2017) (TABLE) (quoting MacDonald v. State, 816 A.2d 750, 753 (Del. 2003)). 45 Ray, at *4 (citing Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d 5, 11 (Del. 1998) (quoting Fanning v. Superior Court, 320 A.2d 343, 345 (Del. 1974)). 46 Dawson v. State, 637 A.2d 57, 62 (Del. 1994) (quoting Bailey v. State, 521 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1987)). 47 Id. 48 See Walker v. State, 790 A.2d 1214, 1220 (Del. 2002) (citation omitted). 49 Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del. 1986). 10 an abuse of the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in making that determination, this Court will not disturb that decision.50 By contras | 1 | 1 |
Steckel v. Stategreen1 sentence2020July 25, 2017) (TABLE) (quoting MacDonald v. State, 816 A.2d 750, 753 (Del. 2003)). 45 Ray, at *4 (citing Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d 5, 11 (Del. 1998) (quoting Fanning v. Superior Court, 320 A.2d 343, 345 (Del. 1974)). 46 Dawson v. State, 637 A.2d 57, 62 (Del. 1994) (quoting Bailey v. State, 521 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1987)). 47 Id. 48 See Walker v. State, 790 A.2d 1214, 1220 (Del. 2002) (citation omitted). 49 Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del. 1986). 10 an abuse of the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in making that determination, this Court will not disturb that decision.50 By contras | 1 | 1 |
Fanning v. Superior Court of the State of Delaware Ex Rel. New Castle Countygreen1 sentence2020July 25, 2017) (TABLE) (quoting MacDonald v. State, 816 A.2d 750, 753 (Del. 2003)). 45 Ray, at *4 (citing Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d 5, 11 (Del. 1998) (quoting Fanning v. Superior Court, 320 A.2d 343, 345 (Del. 1974)). 46 Dawson v. State, 637 A.2d 57, 62 (Del. 1994) (quoting Bailey v. State, 521 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1987)). 47 Id. 48 See Walker v. State, 790 A.2d 1214, 1220 (Del. 2002) (citation omitted). 49 Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del. 1986). 10 an abuse of the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in making that determination, this Court will not disturb that decision.50 By contras | 1 | 1 |
Bailey v. Stategreen2 sentences2020July 25, 2017) (TABLE) (quoting MacDonald v. State, 816 A.2d 750, 753 (Del. 2003)). 45 Ray, at *4 (citing Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d 5, 11 (Del. 1998) (quoting Fanning v. Superior Court, 320 A.2d 343, 345 (Del. 1974)). 46 Dawson v. State, 637 A.2d 57, 62 (Del. 1994) (quoting Bailey v. State, 521 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1987)). 47 Id. 48 See Walker v. State, 790 A.2d 1214, 1220 (Del. 2002) (citation omitted). 49 Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del. 1986). 10 an abuse of the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in making that determination, this Court will not disturb that decision.50 By contras 2020July 25, 2017) (TABLE) (quoting MacDonald v. State, 816 A.2d 750, 753 (Del. 2003)). 45 Ray, at *4 (citing Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d 5, 11 (Del. 1998) (quoting Fanning v. Superior Court, 320 A.2d 343, 345 (Del. 1974)). 46 Dawson v. State, 637 A.2d 57, 62 (Del. 1994) (quoting Bailey v. State, 521 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1987)). 47 Id. 48 See Walker v. State, 790 A.2d 1214, 1220 (Del. 2002) (citation omitted). 49 Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del. 1986). 10 an abuse of the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in making that determination, this Court will not disturb that decision.50 By contras | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Stategreen1 sentence2020July 25, 2017) (TABLE) (quoting MacDonald v. State, 816 A.2d 750, 753 (Del. 2003)). 45 Ray, at *4 (citing Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d 5, 11 (Del. 1998) (quoting Fanning v. Superior Court, 320 A.2d 343, 345 (Del. 1974)). 46 Dawson v. State, 637 A.2d 57, 62 (Del. 1994) (quoting Bailey v. State, 521 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1987)). 47 Id. 48 See Walker v. State, 790 A.2d 1214, 1220 (Del. 2002) (citation omitted). 49 Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del. 1986). 10 an abuse of the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in making that determination, this Court will not disturb that decision.50 By contras | 1 | 1 |
Bowe v. Stategreen1 sentence2020July 25, 2017) (TABLE) (quoting MacDonald v. State, 816 A.2d 750, 753 (Del. 2003)). 45 Ray, at *4 (citing Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d 5, 11 (Del. 1998) (quoting Fanning v. Superior Court, 320 A.2d 343, 345 (Del. 1974)). 46 Dawson v. State, 637 A.2d 57, 62 (Del. 1994) (quoting Bailey v. State, 521 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1987)). 47 Id. 48 See Walker v. State, 790 A.2d 1214, 1220 (Del. 2002) (citation omitted). 49 Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del. 1986). 10 an abuse of the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in making that determination, this Court will not disturb that decision.50 By contras | 1 | 1 |
Dawson v. Stategreen1 sentence2020July 25, 2017) (TABLE) (quoting MacDonald v. State, 816 A.2d 750, 753 (Del. 2003)). 45 Ray, at *4 (citing Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d 5, 11 (Del. 1998) (quoting Fanning v. Superior Court, 320 A.2d 343, 345 (Del. 1974)). 46 Dawson v. State, 637 A.2d 57, 62 (Del. 1994) (quoting Bailey v. State, 521 A.2d 1069, 1077 (Del. 1987)). 47 Id. 48 See Walker v. State, 790 A.2d 1214, 1220 (Del. 2002) (citation omitted). 49 Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del. 1986). 10 an abuse of the trial judge’s exercise of discretion in making that determination, this Court will not disturb that decision.50 By contras | 1 | 1 |
Bland v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Any possible prejudice to Defendant as to Ambrosio’s stricken testimony 64 or the trial delays was mitigated by jury instructions. 58 Washington v. State, 4 A.3d 375, 378 (Del. 2010). 59 Richards v. State, 865 A.2d 1274, 1280 (Del. 2004). 60 Washington, 4 A.3d at 378 (citing Bland v. State, 263 A2d 286, 288 (Del. 1970)). 61 Super. | 1 | 1 |
Richards v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Any possible prejudice to Defendant as to Ambrosio’s stricken testimony 64 or the trial delays was mitigated by jury instructions. 58 Washington v. State, 4 A.3d 375, 378 (Del. 2010). 59 Richards v. State, 865 A.2d 1274, 1280 (Del. 2004). 60 Washington, 4 A.3d at 378 (citing Bland v. State, 263 A2d 286, 288 (Del. 1970)). 61 Super. | 1 | 1 |
Washington v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Any possible prejudice to Defendant as to Ambrosio’s stricken testimony 64 or the trial delays was mitigated by jury instructions. 58 Washington v. State, 4 A.3d 375, 378 (Del. 2010). 59 Richards v. State, 865 A.2d 1274, 1280 (Del. 2004). 60 Washington, 4 A.3d at 378 (citing Bland v. State, 263 A2d 286, 288 (Del. 1970)). 61 Super. 2014Any possible prejudice to Defendant as to Ambrosio’s stricken testimony 64 or the trial delays was mitigated by jury instructions. 58 Washington v. State, 4 A.3d 375, 378 (Del. 2010). 59 Richards v. State, 865 A.2d 1274, 1280 (Del. 2004). 60 Washington, 4 A.3d at 378 (citing Bland v. State, 263 A2d 286, 288 (Del. 1970)). 61 Super. | 1 | 1 |
Sawyer v. Stategreen1 sentence1994Sawyer v. State, Del.Supr., 634 A.2d 377, 380 (1993); Diaz v. State, Del.Supr., 508 A.2d 861, 866 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Diaz v. Stategreen1 sentence1994Sawyer v. State, Del.Supr., 634 A.2d 377, 380 (1993); Diaz v. State, Del.Supr., 508 A.2d 861, 866 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ray v. State
neutral
1 sentence2020Under such circumstances, “[t]his Court reviews a trial court’s denial of a motion for a mistrial under an abuse of discretion standard.” 44 “A trial judge should grant a mistrial only where there is a ‘manifest necessity’ or ‘the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated.’”45 A mistrial is mandated “only when there are no meaningful and practical alternatives to that remedy.”46 “Prejudicial error will normally be cured by the trial judge’s instructions to the jury.”47 But, where a prosecutor’s words seek to discredit defense counsel in the presence of the jury, even subsequent jury i | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Engberg v. Meyer
green
2 sentences1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). 1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Quesinberry
green
2 sentences1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). 1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 406 v. Guidry
green
2 sentences1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). 1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Greene v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). 1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Fullwood v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). 1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Willie v. State
green
2 sentences1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). 1994Willie v. State, Miss.Supr., 585 So.2d 660 (1991); State v. Quesinberry, 319 N.C. 228 , 354 S.E.2d 446 (1987), judgment vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 110 S.Ct. 1465 , 108 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, Wyo.Supr., 820 P.2d 70 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Robert J. Fletcher v. United States
green
1 sentence1989Smith relies upon Fletcher v. United States, 332 F.2d 724 (D.C.Cir.1964) as support for his assertion that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it allowed Robert Smith to take the witness stand, despite Robert’s earlier indication in voir dire that he would refuse to speak before the jury. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Jenkins v. State
green
1 sentence1979IV Defendant contends the Trial Court committed prejudicial error and violated defendant’s constitutional rights in accordance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) and Jenkins v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 610 (1973), by not granting a mistrial when it was learned at the end of the State’s case that accomplices Davis and Wood had made exculpatory statements that were not provided to the defense in response to an appropriate pre-trial discovery motion. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences1979IV Defendant contends the Trial Court committed prejudicial error and violated defendant’s constitutional rights in accordance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) and Jenkins v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 610 (1973), by not granting a mistrial when it was learned at the end of the State’s case that accomplices Davis and Wood had made exculpatory statements that were not provided to the defense in response to an appropriate pre-trial discovery motion. 1979IV Defendant contends the Trial Court committed prejudicial error and violated defendant’s constitutional rights in accordance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) and Jenkins v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 610 (1973), by not granting a mistrial when it was learned at the end of the State’s case that accomplices Davis and Wood had made exculpatory statements that were not provided to the defense in response to an appropriate pre-trial discovery motion. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.