6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Langon v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Cf. Langon v. State, 791 So.2d 1105, 1109-10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“At a status conference ... 2014Cf. Langon v. State, 791 So. 2d 1105, 1109-10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“At a status conference . . . | 2 | 2 |
Lott v. Stategreen1 sentence2004See, e.g., Lee v. State, 826 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Wright & Ford Millworks, Inc. v. Longgreen1 sentence1990See Wright & Ford Millworks, Inc. v. Long, 412 So.2d 892 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Singletary v. State, 483 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1985). | 1 | 1 |
Hollander v. Nolan Brown Motors, Inc.green1 sentence1974See Hollander v. Nolan Brown Motors, Inc., Fla.App. 1973, 272 So.2d 9 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ashley v. State
green
1 sentence1994Osby argues that it was the duty of the state to disclose where the ammunition was found so that the trial court could determine whether the location of the handgun and ammunition were close enough in proximity to be considered a firearm in light of the opinion in Ashley v. State, 619 So.2d 294 (Fla.1993). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Singletary v. State
green
1 sentence1990See Wright & Ford Millworks, Inc. v. Long, 412 So.2d 892 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Singletary v. State, 483 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1985). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
McEachin v. McEachin
green
1 sentence1974By agreement of counsel, the^ Court considered three photographs marked Plaintiff’s exhibits for identification 1, 2 and 3; identified in the deposition of witness Koenig taken August 7, 1972, and attached to Plaintiffs copy of the deposition which was handed to the Court during the hearing.” * * * * * * Having determined that the photographs considered by the court were not made a part of the record at any time and are not now before us, we affirm upon the authority of the rule stated in McEachin v. McEachin, Fla.App. 1963, 154 So.2d 894, 898 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.